i don't think dreams from my father mentions anywhere that obama applied 2 cycles. it in fact suggests that he applied only once as he discusses it only in the context of a certain year. he also says that he only applied to 3 schools, hys.Barack Obama 2.0 wrote:Haha, I asked because I was curious, not because I didn't believe you. I know that he definitely started law school when he was 27. Who knows, he may have applied 2 cycles, I know that Michelle was first waitlisted at Harvard and then one of her prof's at Princeton wrote another letter to the admissions committee and she was eventually admitted off of the waitlist.Barack O'Drama wrote:Barack Obama 2.0 wrote:He did? Where did you learn that?Barack O'Drama wrote: If you want H, just sit out and retake the LSAT and reapply next cycle. If it is your dream, what is another year? Like I always say, Barack Obama applied 2 cycles and finally got H. He also didn't finish law school until he was 30!
Well him not finishing law school until he was 30 is out there. I think I found that out from his book "Dreams From My Father"
Idk where I read he applied 2 cycles. I might be mistaken about that actually or heard it from a non-credible source. But he was definitely 27 when he started law school.
170/3.86 accepted to Columbia($), reapply? Forum
- appind
- Posts: 2266
- Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2012 3:07 am
Re: 170/3.86 accepted to Columbia($), reapply?
- Barack O'Drama
- Posts: 3272
- Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2012 7:21 pm
Re: 170/3.86 accepted to Columbia($), reapply?
No, DFMF is where I read Obama was 27 when he began. As far as the 2 cycles, I'm not sure where I got that and admittedly it might not be true.appind wrote:i don't think dreams from my father mentions anywhere that obama applied 2 cycles. it in fact suggests that he applied only once as he discusses it only in the context of a certain year. he also says that he only applied to 3 schools, hys.Barack Obama 2.0 wrote:Haha, I asked because I was curious, not because I didn't believe you. I know that he definitely started law school when he was 27. Who knows, he may have applied 2 cycles, I know that Michelle was first waitlisted at Harvard and then one of her prof's at Princeton wrote another letter to the admissions committee and she was eventually admitted off of the waitlist.Barack O'Drama wrote:Barack Obama 2.0 wrote:He did? Where did you learn that?Barack O'Drama wrote: If you want H, just sit out and retake the LSAT and reapply next cycle. If it is your dream, what is another year? Like I always say, Barack Obama applied 2 cycles and finally got H. He also didn't finish law school until he was 30!
Well him not finishing law school until he was 30 is out there. I think I found that out from his book "Dreams From My Father"
Idk where I read he applied 2 cycles. I might be mistaken about that actually or heard it from a non-credible source. But he was definitely 27 when he started law school.
Last edited by Barack O'Drama on Fri Jan 26, 2018 7:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- appind
- Posts: 2266
- Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2012 3:07 am
Re: 170/3.86 accepted to Columbia($), reapply?
it's pretty common knowledge that he was 27 when he began hls 1988-91, not exclusive to dfmf. that 2 cycle part doesn't seem correct.Barack O'Drama wrote:No, DFMF is where I read Obama was 27 when he began. As far as the 2 cycles, I'm not sure where I got that and admittedly it might not be true.appind wrote:i don't think dreams from my father mentions anywhere that obama applied 2 cycles. it in fact suggests that he applied only once as he discusses it only in the context of a certain year. he also says that he only applied to 3 schools, hys.Barack Obama 2.0 wrote:Haha, I asked because I was curious, not because I didn't believe you. I know that he definitely started law school when he was 27. Who knows, he may have applied 2 cycles, I know that Michelle was first waitlisted at Harvard and then one of her prof's at Princeton wrote another letter to the admissions committee and she was eventually admitted off of the waitlist.Barack O'Drama wrote:Barack Obama 2.0 wrote:He did? Where did you learn that?Barack O'Drama wrote: If you want H, just sit out and retake the LSAT and reapply next cycle. If it is your dream, what is another year? Like I always say, Barack Obama applied 2 cycles and finally got H. He also didn't finish law school until he was 30!
Well him not finishing law school until he was 30 is out there. I think I found that out from his book "Dreams From My Father"
Idk where I read he applied 2 cycles. I might be mistaken about that actually or heard it from a non-credible source. But he was definitely 27 when he started law school.
- Barack O'Drama
- Posts: 3272
- Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2012 7:21 pm
Re: 170/3.86 accepted to Columbia($), reapply?
Dude cool. That is where I first read it a while back. I'm sure it is common knowledge. Never said it was exclusive to DFMF. It's a book I read back when I started high school so apologies if I don't remember the details. As for the 2 cycles, I'm pretty sure it isn't correct at this point, because I can't find anything on it. I'll post if I can verify anything on it though.appind wrote:it's pretty common knowledge that he was 27 when he began hls 1988-91, not exclusive to dfmf. that 2 cycle part doesn't seem correct.Barack O'Drama wrote:No, DFMF is where I read Obama was 27 when he began. As far as the 2 cycles, I'm not sure where I got that and admittedly it might not be true.appind wrote:i don't think dreams from my father mentions anywhere that obama applied 2 cycles. it in fact suggests that he applied only once as he discusses it only in the context of a certain year. he also says that he only applied to 3 schools, hys.Barack Obama 2.0 wrote:Haha, I asked because I was curious, not because I didn't believe you. I know that he definitely started law school when he was 27. Who knows, he may have applied 2 cycles, I know that Michelle was first waitlisted at Harvard and then one of her prof's at Princeton wrote another letter to the admissions committee and she was eventually admitted off of the waitlist.Barack O'Drama wrote:Barack Obama 2.0 wrote:He did? Where did you learn that?Barack O'Drama wrote: If you want H, just sit out and retake the LSAT and reapply next cycle. If it is your dream, what is another year? Like I always say, Barack Obama applied 2 cycles and finally got H. He also didn't finish law school until he was 30!
Well him not finishing law school until he was 30 is out there. I think I found that out from his book "Dreams From My Father"
Idk where I read he applied 2 cycles. I might be mistaken about that actually or heard it from a non-credible source. But he was definitely 27 when he started law school.
Last edited by Barack O'Drama on Fri Jan 26, 2018 7:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Helioze
- Posts: 228
- Joined: Sat Mar 29, 2014 5:10 am
Re: 170/3.86 accepted to Columbia($), reapply?
I have said that he applied twice before.
Dude cool. That is where I first read it a while back. I'm sure it is common knowledge. Never said it was exclusive to DFMF. It's a book I read back when I started high school so apologies if I don't remember the details. As for the 2 cycles, I'm pretty sure it isn't correct at this point, because I can't find anything on it. I'll post if I can verify anything on it though.
I have also said a lot of dumb stuff.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Barack O'Drama
- Posts: 3272
- Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2012 7:21 pm
Re: 170/3.86 accepted to Columbia($), reapply?
Lol. I hear you man...Same here.Helioze wrote:I have said that he applied twice before.
Dude cool. That is where I first read it a while back. I'm sure it is common knowledge. Never said it was exclusive to DFMF. It's a book I read back when I started high school so apologies if I don't remember the details. As for the 2 cycles, I'm pretty sure it isn't correct at this point, because I can't find anything on it. I'll post if I can verify anything on it though.
I have also said a lot of dumb stuff.
In any case, there was a great point and that was to not rush taking the damn LSAT.
I could have sworn I read it somewhere, but I can't find a single thing on it now. So I think it is safe to assume he only applied once.
Last edited by Barack O'Drama on Fri Jan 26, 2018 7:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Helioze
- Posts: 228
- Joined: Sat Mar 29, 2014 5:10 am
Re: 170/3.86 accepted to Columbia($), reapply?
I also read DFMF and I remember distinctly the part about him applying to law school and him being cocky about the whole process. (Something about semi-gloating to an old man that he only applied to HYS and was sure to get in.) I don't think that would fit the narrative that he applied twice.Barack O'Drama wrote:Lol. I hear you man...Same here.Helioze wrote:I have said that he applied twice before.
Dude cool. That is where I first read it a while back. I'm sure it is common knowledge. Never said it was exclusive to DFMF. It's a book I read back when I started high school so apologies if I don't remember the details. As for the 2 cycles, I'm pretty sure it isn't correct at this point, because I can't find anything on it. I'll post if I can verify anything on it though.
I have also said a lot of dumb stuff.
In any case, there was a great point and that was to not rush taking the damn LSAT.
I could have sworn I read it somewhere, but I can't find a single thing on it now. So I think it is safe to assume he only applied once.
- Barack O'Drama
- Posts: 3272
- Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2012 7:21 pm
Re: 170/3.86 accepted to Columbia($), reapply?
Ok thanks! I haven't read that thing in close to 8 years, so my brain was a bit rusty.Helioze wrote:I also read DFMF and I remember distinctly the part about him applying to law school and him being cocky about the whole process. (Something about semi-gloating to an old man that he only applied to HYS and was sure to get in.) I don't think that would fit the narrative that he applied twice.Barack O'Drama wrote:Lol. I hear you man...Same here.Helioze wrote:I have said that he applied twice before.
Dude cool. That is where I first read it a while back. I'm sure it is common knowledge. Never said it was exclusive to DFMF. It's a book I read back when I started high school so apologies if I don't remember the details. As for the 2 cycles, I'm pretty sure it isn't correct at this point, because I can't find anything on it. I'll post if I can verify anything on it though.
I have also said a lot of dumb stuff.
In any case, there was a great point and that was to not rush taking the damn LSAT.
I could have sworn I read it somewhere, but I can't find a single thing on it now. So I think it is safe to assume he only applied once.
So hopefully this can finally settle it. He did not apply twice.
Last edited by Barack O'Drama on Fri Jan 26, 2018 7:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 77
- Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2016 4:01 am
Re: 170/3.86 accepted to Columbia($), reapply?
That doesn't sound right. There's no way you don't get a URM bump if you are Guatamalan, Salvadorean or from other Central American countries once (or currently) ruled by military dictatorships.Barack Obama 2.0 wrote:To my knowledge no. If you are hispanic, I believe you must be Mexican-American to be considered a URM.PrezRand wrote:Are people from Central America not considered URMs?Barack Obama 2.0 wrote:He's Cuban, so I don't think so.PrezRand wrote:Would Ted Cruz be considered a URM? Lol
- jbagelboy
- Posts: 10361
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm
Re: 170/3.86 accepted to Columbia($), reapply?
Those groups are not under-represented in law school relative to the general American population. it isn't a contest of which group has historically suffered most. URM are those groups that are considered under-represented minorities for the purposes of law school admission. URM =/= diverse.SlippinJimmy wrote:That doesn't sound right. There's no way you don't get a URM bump if you are Guatamalan, Salvadorean or from other Central American countries once (or currently) ruled by military dictatorships.Barack Obama 2.0 wrote:To my knowledge no. If you are hispanic, I believe you must be Mexican-American to be considered a URM.PrezRand wrote:Are people from Central America not considered URMs?Barack Obama 2.0 wrote:He's Cuban, so I don't think so.PrezRand wrote:Would Ted Cruz be considered a URM? Lol
-
- Posts: 77
- Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2016 4:01 am
Re: 170/3.86 accepted to Columbia($), reapply?
That makes sense, though I find it hard to believe groups that immigrate as essentially economic refugees are adequately represented in law school regardless of how small they may be relative to national demographics.jbagelboy wrote:Those groups are not under-represented in law school relative to the general American population. it isn't a contest of which group has historically suffered most. URM are those groups that are considered under-represented minorities for the purposes of law school admission. URM =/= diverse.SlippinJimmy wrote:
That doesn't sound right. There's no way you don't get a URM bump if you are Guatamalan, Salvadorean or from other Central American countries once (or currently) ruled by military dictatorships.
- cavalier1138
- Posts: 8007
- Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2016 8:01 pm
Re: 170/3.86 accepted to Columbia($), reapply?
Well, bear in mind that a number of people who left those countries did so because they were part of the ruling class and were more or less on the receiving end of the coup. I have no idea if that's the case for every Central/South American country, but the fact remains that those populations are evidently represented enough in law schools that they don't receive any boosts.SlippinJimmy wrote:That makes sense, though I find it hard to believe groups that immigrate as essentially economic refugees are adequately represented in law school regardless of how small they may be relative to national demographics.jbagelboy wrote:Those groups are not under-represented in law school relative to the general American population. it isn't a contest of which group has historically suffered most. URM are those groups that are considered under-represented minorities for the purposes of law school admission. URM =/= diverse.SlippinJimmy wrote:
That doesn't sound right. There's no way you don't get a URM bump if you are Guatamalan, Salvadorean or from other Central American countries once (or currently) ruled by military dictatorships.
-
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2016 9:25 pm
Re: 170/3.86 accepted to Columbia($), reapply?
OP, you should definitely retest. Since you broke that 170 barrier, getting it up to a 173 or 174 would give you a significant leg up.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- calpolisci2016
- Posts: 391
- Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2016 1:42 am
Re: 170/3.86 accepted to Columbia($), reapply?
Do law schools distinguish between nationalities or is it just broadly "race" like white, black, Asian?
Do law schools distinguish between a Mexican American and a Peruvian American, for example, when considering a URM?
Do law schools distinguish between a Mexican American and a Peruvian American, for example, when considering a URM?
- A. Nony Mouse
- Posts: 29293
- Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 11:51 am
Re: 170/3.86 accepted to Columbia($), reapply?
It's not entirely clear. For a long time people always said it was only Mexican-Americans and Puerto Ricans that got the bump, I think because those groups were specifically mentioned in the relevant Supreme Court case (and due to their underrepresentation. It's not clear that Peruvian-Americans, for instance, are underrepresented in US law schools). However, people have been reporting more recently that LSAC and many (? some? not sure) schools ask only whether you're Hispanic/Latino, and don't ask you to parse it further - so even if schools wanted to distinguish between groups, they might not be able to do so.
(Only MA/PRs out of Hispanics, that is - other groups that get an identifiable bump are AAs and NAs.)
(Only MA/PRs out of Hispanics, that is - other groups that get an identifiable bump are AAs and NAs.)
-
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2016 9:25 pm
Re: 170/3.86 accepted to Columbia($), reapply?
Hate to jump on the OP's thread, but question regarding Hispanic/Latino:
Could I check the box? My grandma was born and raised in Argentina, making me 1/4 Latin American. IF that helps my chances (and it's legal), I'm all for it...
Could I check the box? My grandma was born and raised in Argentina, making me 1/4 Latin American. IF that helps my chances (and it's legal), I'm all for it...
- star fox
- Posts: 20790
- Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2013 4:13 pm
Re: 170/3.86 accepted to Columbia($), reapply?
Get a full ride from Northwestern and fuck going into debt for better schools imo.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- ForumCommissar
- Posts: 88
- Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2016 11:40 am
Re: 170/3.86 accepted to Columbia($), reapply?
Out of curiosity, could a Hispanic that's not exactly of Mexican descent (for instance, let's say a Cuban) but was nonetheless "Mexican" enough to pass as Mexican, would there be any real way LSAC could prove otherwise? I suppose they could talk to family but what if they were in on it.
Or do URM's indeed have to prove they are URM?
I'm white as white gets btw so none of this applies to me.
Or do URM's indeed have to prove they are URM?
I'm white as white gets btw so none of this applies to me.
- A. Nony Mouse
- Posts: 29293
- Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 11:51 am
Re: 170/3.86 accepted to Columbia($), reapply?
It would be creepy to make someone "prove" they're URM, so no. (Closest is that there is some discussion that NAs with tribal membership fare better than NAs who don't have tribal membership, but that's complicated.)
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login