Warning Forum

(Rankings, Profiles, Tuition, Student Life, . . . )
User avatar
sesto elemento

Gold
Posts: 1549
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2014 7:29 pm

Re: Warning

Post by sesto elemento » Fri Sep 26, 2014 3:24 pm

DavidConeSplitter wrote:I read somewhere that George Washington struck out at OCI AND LOOK AT HIM NOW LOOK AT HIM NOW
Same thing with Sotomayor, struck out and is now SCOTUS. Anything is possible with a law degree*!


*From Yale

AReasonableMan

Gold
Posts: 1504
Joined: Sun Sep 21, 2014 9:32 pm

Re: Warning

Post by AReasonableMan » Fri Sep 26, 2014 3:39 pm

As an FYI many, many people strikeout from t-14's. If you go to a school below CCN, are not diverse, are anywhere close to median, only have ties to NYC/Cali/DC, it's very likely you may strikeout.

This is why sticker to t-14 is so dangerous. On a big law salary, it's not that hard to pay off 200k. If you live off of 60k per year you could pay it off in 5-6 years.

Half or more strikeout at many t-14's. Certain types of diverse candidates anywhere near median don't strikeout. People from Texas and similar markets anywhere near median don't strikeout. Below median makes big law almost impossible, but only about half will get it. Except for prestigious PI jobs, most people don't opt to do things like research or shit law unless they need to. Most people skipping OCI have bad grades. People become much more concerned about saving the world, and how everyone's a sellout and uncaring person after they strikeout.

It's very likely you may strikeout. At TT's you need to be valedictorian worthy to feel somewhat protected. Law review grade on's have a shot. The be at the top of your class logic makes it possible you'll get big law, but for the number one student at a TTT, their odds are still much lower than what you'd get at any casino. For a TTT going in, it's like a lottery ticket, only much more money, requires much more work than scratching, and the reward is working very long hours. For a given TTT student they'd be better off using 200k on lottery tickets. Unfortunately, the government refuses to give 200k to purchase lottery tickets. If a student cared only about finances, and not morals, most financial advisers would tell them to go to Vegas if their goal is to make money. The odds of winning are higher, and the payoff is much larger.
Last edited by AReasonableMan on Fri Sep 26, 2014 3:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
ManoftheHour

Gold
Posts: 3486
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2013 6:03 pm

Re: Warning

Post by ManoftheHour » Fri Sep 26, 2014 3:53 pm

Callsam wrote:There's a bro on another thread here who is just below median at a t14 who struck out at oci. When t14 kids aren't getting big law, you're certainly not getting it from that TT/TTT you're thinking about going too.
I'm dropping out right now. Thanks for the heads up.

User avatar
Crowing

Gold
Posts: 2631
Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:20 pm

Re: Warning

Post by Crowing » Fri Sep 26, 2014 5:54 pm

brazleton wrote:
JohannDeMann wrote:Warning 50% of t14 people just ecstatically accepted jobs that will make what should be the best years of their life miserable.
OP's thread is bad and he should feel bad. But on another point. Do people really believe the bolded above? Does anyone other than mid-twenties folk say it? Do you guys think life ends at 30? I've heard this enough times on TLS to wonder.
My life definitely peaked at like 17.

User avatar
banjo

Silver
Posts: 1351
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2011 8:00 pm

Re: Warning

Post by banjo » Fri Sep 26, 2014 6:29 pm

I know above-median people at CLS who completely struck out or came frighteningly close. Nobody thinks they're going to be part of the 10-15% until it actually happens.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


BrooklynLaw16

Bronze
Posts: 112
Joined: Tue Jul 16, 2013 2:31 pm

Re: Warning

Post by BrooklynLaw16 » Sun Sep 28, 2014 2:48 am

Brooklyn law TTTTTTTTTTTTTT here going to a V50 firm this summer.

That enough T's for ya?

iliketurtles123

Bronze
Posts: 267
Joined: Wed Jan 15, 2014 10:14 pm

Re: Warning

Post by iliketurtles123 » Sun Sep 28, 2014 3:03 am

banjo wrote:I know above-median people at CLS who completely struck out or came frighteningly close. Nobody thinks they're going to be part of the 10-15% until it actually happens.
I'm around median (slightly above) at CCN and I'm frighteningly close to striking out.
We'll see what happens. I do have a few more leads but striking out is very real at this point

objctnyrhnr

Moderator
Posts: 1521
Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2013 2:44 am

Re: Warning

Post by objctnyrhnr » Sun Sep 28, 2014 4:22 am

sounds like you guys (the ones who have "almost struck out") are terrible interviewers/lack the requisite social skills necessary to succeed in life/have gotten very unlucky...but probably not this last one.

User avatar
sublime

Diamond
Posts: 17385
Joined: Sun Mar 10, 2013 12:21 pm

Re: Warning

Post by sublime » Sun Sep 28, 2014 4:33 am

..

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


User avatar
A. Nony Mouse

Diamond
Posts: 29293
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 11:51 am

Re: Warning

Post by A. Nony Mouse » Sun Sep 28, 2014 9:08 am

objctnyrhnr wrote:sounds like you guys (the ones who have "almost struck out") are terrible interviewers/lack the requisite social skills necessary to succeed in life/have gotten very unlucky...but probably not this last one.
:|

User avatar
banjo

Silver
Posts: 1351
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2011 8:00 pm

Re: Warning

Post by banjo » Sun Sep 28, 2014 10:58 am

objctnyrhnr wrote:sounds like you guys (the ones who have "almost struck out") are terrible interviewers/lack the requisite social skills necessary to succeed in life/have gotten very unlucky...but probably not this last one.
Law schools should have an optional social skills / networking workshop that meets every week. It should teach people how to have a 5-10 minute or 20-30 minute conversation, how to project confidence, shake hands, etc. These skills need to be taught. I don't understand why we coddle people to death academically (do we really need a TA session for Torts??), but make people teach themselves these vital social skills.

User avatar
sublime

Diamond
Posts: 17385
Joined: Sun Mar 10, 2013 12:21 pm

Re: Warning

Post by sublime » Sun Sep 28, 2014 11:03 am

..

It's A Lion

Gold
Posts: 1769
Joined: Sun Jan 12, 2014 2:10 pm

Re: Warning

Post by It's A Lion » Sun Sep 28, 2014 11:07 am

sublime wrote:
DELG wrote:
It's A Lion wrote:Tucker Max struck out and look that guy now!
no, he got no offered

And he is on "our side" now:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/tucker-ma ... 13943.html

Still a tremendous douche though.
Holy shit, that's not a bad write up.

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


User avatar
Colonel_funkadunk

Gold
Posts: 3248
Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2014 11:03 pm

Re: Warning

Post by Colonel_funkadunk » Sun Sep 28, 2014 11:08 am

Crowing wrote:
My life definitely peaked at like 17.

User avatar
banjo

Silver
Posts: 1351
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2011 8:00 pm

Re: Warning

Post by banjo » Sun Sep 28, 2014 11:16 am

sublime wrote:
banjo wrote:
objctnyrhnr wrote:sounds like you guys (the ones who have "almost struck out") are terrible interviewers/lack the requisite social skills necessary to succeed in life/have gotten very unlucky...but probably not this last one.
Law schools should have an optional social skills / networking workshop that meets every week. It should teach people how to have a 5-10 minute or 20-30 minute conversation, how to project confidence, shake hands, etc. These skills need to be taught. I don't understand why we coddle people to death academically (do we really need a TA session for Torts??), but make people teach themselves these vital social skills.

My school had some shit like this, not weekly, but they offered it. They didn't seem to be too well attended.
Not surprised that it wasn't well-attended. Law students are horrible at identifying their own weaknesses.

User avatar
pancakes3

Platinum
Posts: 6619
Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2014 2:49 pm

Re: Warning

Post by pancakes3 » Sun Sep 28, 2014 12:13 pm

It's A Lion wrote:
sublime wrote:
DELG wrote:
It's A Lion wrote:Tucker Max struck out and look that guy now!
no, he got no offered

And he is on "our side" now:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/tucker-ma ... 13943.html

Still a tremendous douche though.
Holy shit, that's not a bad write up.
I thought that also. Then I realized it was a good write-up as far as message board posts go. That shit is on a "news" site. But hey, huffpo is going to huffpo. Cracked has higher journalistic standards than they do.

mvp99

Silver
Posts: 1474
Joined: Fri Mar 14, 2014 9:00 pm

Re: Warning

Post by mvp99 » Wed Oct 01, 2014 12:27 am

sesto elemento wrote:
DavidConeSplitter wrote:I read somewhere that George Washington struck out at OCI AND LOOK AT HIM NOW LOOK AT HIM NOW
Same thing with Sotomayor, struck out and is now SCOTUS. Anything is possible with a law degree*!


*From Yale
Wasn't she no offered??

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


mvp99

Silver
Posts: 1474
Joined: Fri Mar 14, 2014 9:00 pm

Re: Warning

Post by mvp99 » Wed Oct 01, 2014 12:31 am

I learned today that some LS have surpassed the 60k tuition + fees barrier (Columbia).... please don't attend sticker

User avatar
ManoftheHour

Gold
Posts: 3486
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2013 6:03 pm

Re: Warning

Post by ManoftheHour » Wed Oct 01, 2014 12:34 am

mvp99 wrote:I learned today that some LS have surpassed the 60k tuition + fees barrier (Columbia).... please don't attend sticker
WHAT. THE. FUCK.

User avatar
Robb

Bronze
Posts: 330
Joined: Fri Feb 14, 2014 10:21 pm

Re: Warning

Post by Robb » Wed Oct 01, 2014 12:35 am

banjo wrote:
sublime wrote:
banjo wrote:
objctnyrhnr wrote:sounds like you guys (the ones who have "almost struck out") are terrible interviewers/lack the requisite social skills necessary to succeed in life/have gotten very unlucky...but probably not this last one.
Law schools should have an optional social skills / networking workshop that meets every week. It should teach people how to have a 5-10 minute or 20-30 minute conversation, how to project confidence, shake hands, etc. These skills need to be taught. I don't understand why we coddle people to death academically (do we really need a TA session for Torts??), but make people teach themselves these vital social skills.

My school had some shit like this, not weekly, but they offered it. They didn't seem to be too well attended.
Not surprised that it wasn't well-attended. Law students are horrible at identifying their own weaknesses.
I actually don't think it's that at all. People who aren't good socially tend to know it.

I think people are embarrassed to attend something like that, because they are afraid to publicly admit that they have less than ideal social skills. This is because of forums like TLS, where people throw out terms like "aspie" in a derogatory way and make fun of people for not knowing social norms that they never had the opportunity to learn. It's because of people gossiping about every tiny slipup a person makes, and no one wants to embarrassingly say - hey, that's me, I'm not perfect, I could use a bit of help in social interaction.

It's just another part of the ridiculous law school culture.

User avatar
sesto elemento

Gold
Posts: 1549
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2014 7:29 pm

Re: Warning

Post by sesto elemento » Wed Oct 01, 2014 3:45 am

mvp99 wrote:
sesto elemento wrote:
DavidConeSplitter wrote:I read somewhere that George Washington struck out at OCI AND LOOK AT HIM NOW LOOK AT HIM NOW
Same thing with Sotomayor, struck out and is now SCOTUS. Anything is possible with a law degree*!


*From Yale
Wasn't she no offered??
You are correct. No offered from Paul Weiss.

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


User avatar
Sheriff

Bronze
Posts: 265
Joined: Thu Oct 02, 2014 2:06 pm

Re: Warning

Post by Sheriff » Sat Oct 04, 2014 4:47 pm

During my 0L visits I noticed that the higher in rank I went the weirder students were. There are plenty of highly intelligent people in the t14 who can't interview worth a damn.

At the end of the day were all monkeys and want to be around other monkeys that we enjoy.

tier3

New
Posts: 41
Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2014 5:15 pm

Re: Warning

Post by tier3 » Sat Oct 11, 2014 2:42 pm

There are open law careers advertised all over numerous job websites. The only people not getting jobs are those that lower their heads in defeat. It's not that difficult just don't give up. You may not get big law. But I'm sure many can live nicely on $120,000 a year, as long as they didn't max out their COL in law school and lived conservatively.

User avatar
sublime

Diamond
Posts: 17385
Joined: Sun Mar 10, 2013 12:21 pm

Re: Warning

Post by sublime » Sat Oct 11, 2014 2:44 pm

..

User avatar
A. Nony Mouse

Diamond
Posts: 29293
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 11:51 am

Re: Warning

Post by A. Nony Mouse » Sat Oct 11, 2014 3:17 pm

tier3 wrote:There are open law careers advertised all over numerous job websites. The only people not getting jobs are those that lower their heads in defeat. It's not that difficult just don't give up. You may not get big law. But I'm sure many can live nicely on $120,000 a year, as long as they didn't max out their COL in law school and lived conservatively.
Do you know people who are actually applying for and getting those jobs? Do you realize that most of those jobs are not looking for entry-level attorneys right out of law school, and if you don't get a job out of law school, you don't get the experience to make you competitive for lateral positions? Do you realize that lawyer salaries tend to be bimodal, which means that you're looking at $160K or $40-60K, not $120K a year?

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “Choosing a Law School”