Ricky-Bobby wrote:
I am not in law school yet.
So let me get this strait, you are an 0L logging on to a website and emphatically posting advice for another 0L? Yeah that's definitely the kinda advice the OP wanted. Look bro, the only difference between you and the OP is your overconfidence. Stop posting in advice threads.
Ricky-Bobby wrote:
Oh I see. This is the part of the conversation where we pit your anecdata against my anecdote.
We just established that you do not have an anecdote, you're an 0L. A few convo's with old dudes at a firm where you were a gofer is not helpful. I on the other hand have an anecdote, went to a regional school without ties to the state and landed a job. Ties never came up, because it seemed like every single person who interviewed me was an alum of my law school. This would likely be the case if OP went to OU or KU.
Ricky-Bobby wrote:
First of all, I never explicitly made this discussion about KU specifically. Other than your inference from "local TTT," KU was never mentioned. I did, in fact, mention other Midwest schools. You narrowed it down, but that's ok. My point still stands.
You said local TTT. However, none of the schools OP mentioned, OU, KU, Mizzou, fit that bill. For example, the state of Oklahoma has a "TTT." That would be Ok City U. So there is a prestige hierarchy in Oklahoma. OU is at the top. People there are proud of OU. So if OP moved to Oklahoma and attended OU he or she would interview with people that were ready to hear the "why OU and Oklahoma" story because many of them made the same choice. This isn't to say that being a local isn't an advantage, knowing people is super. However, I'd rather be the enterprising people person who happened to be an "outsider" than the guy from down the street who is fucking weird or just plain rude to people. Jesus I just said outsider. I swear people on TLS think so many regions in this country are just like fucking Game of Thrones.
Ricky-Bobby wrote:
Most employers know that 0Ls are stupid and go to the highest-ranked shithole they get into, no matter where that is.
No. The real world is nothing like TLS. People on TLS tend to be prestige seeking, moreso than the general applicant pool by a mile. I know dozens of students who attended law school at OU. I attended law school at CU. The vast majority of people did not attend these schools because of rankings, unless the decision was down to two schools in the desired area, like CU/DU or OU/Tulsa. You are having a massive forest for the trees problem dude. I recommend less TLS.
Ricky-Bobby wrote:
The fact that so many other TLSers tell the same tale seems to suggest my anecdata is sound.
No. Though I don't post with the insane frequency of many on here, I have been on this site for years. The first time I looked at TLS was in 2008. I disagree with you here, too. What I have found is tons of anecdotes from around the country posted by traditional (read, T14) TLS posters. They seem to have trouble with ties when interviewing across the country. This makes total sense. They go to fill in the blank national school on the east coast, and of course the employer in chicago is concerned. Not only is this applicant way more ambitious than the local school bro, but this applicant has options all over the country. Local bro does not.
If you have discovered anything more than this, please share.
Ricky-Bobby wrote:
I'm happy you were able to establish ties and get a job by going to the local school. Great for you. Just don't advise this guy to pin his whole future on a 60% chance of a small law job in KC after graduating from KU.
Thanks. And to the second part, I wasn't doing that. I was just logging on and posting from experience, as someone who is, ya know, a lawyer, and who happens to be from this area of the country. Sorry my advice didn't jive with your 0L worldview. By all means, if its your cup of tea, convince yourself to attend the "best" school you get into, or whatever your thing may be. But please don't post in the advice forums.