Lol I thought he was adding 51 as a constant to each school's scorejbagelboy wrote:why 51+ private firms? lots of TTT 60 person small market firms paying $55K out there

Lol I thought he was adding 51 as a constant to each school's scorejbagelboy wrote:why 51+ private firms? lots of TTT 60 person small market firms paying $55K out there
Blessedassurance wrote:SECOND PAGE, PLEASE
Want to continue reading?
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
Particularly into non-legal careers. I'm going to LS to become a policymaking international investment banker for environmental corporations. Where should I gO?jk148706 wrote:Where is the graph/rankings that shows which schools open the most doors?
Regent has dat Republican connect.bugsy33 wrote:So according to your ratings schools like Elon and Washburn are more prestigious than Utah and Pepperdine? Regent University is more prestigious than Emory?
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm.
It's SCHCYP, get it right.Danger Zone wrote:So... HYSCCP?
Next year you can start charging for your rankings.Desert Fox wrote:I'm pretty proud of this
Register now!
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
Yeah. It's hard to tell with some of these. Some are good. For instance, last year's NALP for Minnesota had the 51-100 person firms(all of whom reported) making the same salaries as those in higher levels. That is most likely due to the market, as New York would likely be much different. This is where individual research would have to come injbagelboy wrote:that's fair for that school but i think it's unlikely to hold up outside the T14. Probably inflating a bunch of other schoolsDesert Fox wrote:Northwestern had 6 people in 51-101. Median salary was 160k, 25% percentile was 148k. Similar data from 2012 and 2011. These firms are often just boutiques.jbagelboy wrote:why 51+ private firms? lots of TTT 60 person small market firms paying $55K out there
101+ discriminates against schools who draw in people from smaller towns.
Yeah I would disagree that this is inflating schools. 50+ firms could either be great or less than great in NYC, LA, CHI, but pretty much everywhere else these are high paying firms. 50+ is very large for Denver, KC, St. Louis, Okc, etc.The Dark Shepard wrote:Yeah. It's hard to tell with some of these. Some are good. For instance, last year's NALP for Minnesota had the 51-100 person firms(all of whom reported) making the same salaries as those in higher levels. That is most likely due to the market, as New York would likely be much different. This is where individual research would have to come injbagelboy wrote:that's fair for that school but i think it's unlikely to hold up outside the T14. Probably inflating a bunch of other schoolsDesert Fox wrote:Northwestern had 6 people in 51-101. Median salary was 160k, 25% percentile was 148k. Similar data from 2012 and 2011. These firms are often just boutiques.jbagelboy wrote:why 51+ private firms? lots of TTT 60 person small market firms paying $55K out there
101+ discriminates against schools who draw in people from smaller towns.
He ran out of fuel just before the ranking.MikeSpivey wrote:DesertFox,
You are the fox! But just an fyi, I don't think your rankings has actual ranks. With that you can dominate the North African Front.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Already a member? Login