DU Dean Pleads With Prospective Students- Cites Cooley Forum
- Xs20
- Posts: 815
- Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2012 8:03 pm
- dr123
- Posts: 3497
- Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2011 2:38 am
Re: DU Dean Pleads With Prospective Students- Cites Cooley
Yea, retirement is a thing of the past. We're all going to die working.fatduck wrote:lol we're all gonna be working until 80+ brocahwc12 wrote: 2) I guess we can agree to disagree, but I don't see how 10% of your lifetime career earnings is a small number. And with the average age of law school students being about 26, that means these lawyers will work until 70? Who plans to work until 70?
-
- Posts: 1592
- Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2011 4:37 pm
Re: DU Dean Pleads With Prospective Students- Cites Cooley
Just an update. Backlash from the likes of ITLSS and TLS has prompted DU to edit the statement. It is still horse-shit, but at least it doesn't claim that "Forbes" believes that law school is a great deal. Now it correctly states that "Some dude," who wrote in an op-ed to Forbes and is in no way speaking on behalf of Forbes, believes that law school is a great deal. I doubt prospective 0Ls will actually look into the back ground of the writer, who, of course, happens to work for an LSAT prep company.
At least this is proof that our efforts aren't completely futile. I know 99% of what goes on here looks like complaining, or actually is complaining, but there is real progress that is made from time to time. I think a collective pat on the back is in order.
At least this is proof that our efforts aren't completely futile. I know 99% of what goes on here looks like complaining, or actually is complaining, but there is real progress that is made from time to time. I think a collective pat on the back is in order.
- cahwc12
- Posts: 942
- Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2012 4:49 pm
Re: DU Dean Pleads With Prospective Students- Cites Cooley
Lord Randolph McDuff wrote:Just an update. Backlash from the likes of ITLSS and TLS has prompted DU to edit the statement. It is still horse-shit, but at least it doesn't claim that "Forbes" believes that law school is a great deal. Now it correctly states that "Some dude," who wrote in an op-ed to Forbes and is in no way speaking on behalf of Forbes, believes that law school is a great deal. I doubt prospective 0Ls will actually look into the back ground of the writer, who, of course, happens to work for an LSAT prep company.
At least this is proof that our efforts aren't completely futile. I know 99% of what goes on here looks like complaining, or actually is complaining, but there is real progress that is made from time to time. I think a collective pat on the back is in order.
It still makes an equivocation between earning a JD and being a lawyer. No one disputes that lawyers makes more on average than those with only a bachelor's degree. What's being disputed is what one's chances are at becoming a lawyer.O’Connor’s piece in Forbes provides an accurate comparative analysis. He notes that the average lifetime earnings for a lawyer is $4.03 million, and that the average lifetime earnings for a person with only a bachelor’s degree is $2.27 million. In other words, over a lifetime of employment, the lawyer earns $1.76 million more.[17] As O’Connor points out in Forbes, this not only justifies the cost of law school, it is an excellent investmen.t[18]
With only 37% of the class reporting salaries and only 47.4% of the class employed as lawyers at Denver there is still good reason to be highly skeptical of the boom and bloom picture painted on the website.
Also, the website still credits Forbes in the headline:
I wonder what Forbes thinks of some university using their name brand to promote its profiteering scam?Myth #3: Salaries earned by recent law graduates do not justify the cost of law school.
Fact #3: Law salaries are likely to make law school a solid economic investment.
Reality: When it comes to a career in law, as Forbes says, the significant, “lifelong returns justify the investment for the vast majority of applicants.”
edit: wow this motherfucker
The author of the cited forbes article runs a shitty prep company, but I can't even post the link because it's censored due to his previous board spamming. This is too funny to make up.
- stuckinthemiddle
- Posts: 312
- Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2012 2:24 am
Re: DU Dean Pleads With Prospective Students- Cites Cooley

Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- romanticegotist
- Posts: 1773
- Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2013 4:15 pm
Re: DU Dean Pleads With Prospective Students- Cites Cooley
No way I'm totally planning to get full social security benefits at 65 and sail off into the retirement sunset...fatduck wrote:lol we're all gonna be working until 80+ brocahwc12 wrote: 2) I guess we can agree to disagree, but I don't see how 10% of your lifetime career earnings is a small number. And with the average age of law school students being about 26, that means these lawyers will work until 70? Who plans to work until 70?
- cahwc12
- Posts: 942
- Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2012 4:49 pm
Re: DU Dean Pleads With Prospective Students- Cites Cooley
It doesn't even end there. Shawn P. O'Connor is my new vote for #1 shitbag propagandist of 2013
http://www.usnews.com/education/blogs/l ... or-in-2013
http://www.usnews.com/education/blogs/l ... or-in-2013