How is 5.8% a decent shot?Teflon_Jeff wrote:
They placed 5.8% of grads into NYC, so if you hustle and get good grades, you have a decent shot. More importantly, with no debt, you'll be okay no matter what.
Fordham vs. Wake Forest ($$$) Forum
- Easy-E
- Posts: 6487
- Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2011 1:46 pm
Re: Fordham vs. Wake Forest ($$$)
- Nova
- Posts: 9102
- Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2012 8:55 pm
Re: Fordham vs. Wake Forest ($$$)
subjective terms are subjective.emarxnj wrote:How is 5.8% a decent shot?Teflon_Jeff wrote:
They placed 5.8% of grads into NYC, so if you hustle and get good grades, you have a decent shot. More importantly, with no debt, you'll be okay no matter what.
(2.5% in 501+, 4.6% in 101+)Rutgers-C wrote:Our average starting salary for a 2011 graduate who enters private practice is in excess of $74,000, with many top students accepting positions with firms paying in excess of $130,000
-
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2011 11:03 pm
Re: Fordham vs. Wake Forest ($$$)
Wake is TCR
- Teflon_Jeff
- Posts: 123
- Joined: Sat Jan 07, 2012 3:43 pm
Re: Fordham vs. Wake Forest ($$$)
Meaning if he hustles and gets good grades (top 20%) he may have a decent shot. Not a good one, but decent.emarxnj wrote:How is 5.8% a decent shot?Teflon_Jeff wrote:
They placed 5.8% of grads into NYC, so if you hustle and get good grades, you have a decent shot. More importantly, with no debt, you'll be okay no matter what.
No debt to me means a decent shot is better than a good shot with Huge debt.
-
- Posts: 286
- Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2012 11:57 pm
Re: Fordham vs. Wake Forest ($$$)
lol manyNova wrote:subjective terms are subjective.emarxnj wrote:How is 5.8% a decent shot?Teflon_Jeff wrote:
They placed 5.8% of grads into NYC, so if you hustle and get good grades, you have a decent shot. More importantly, with no debt, you'll be okay no matter what.
(2.5% in 501+, 4.6% in 101+)Rutgers-C wrote:Our average starting salary for a 2011 graduate who enters private practice is in excess of $74,000, with many top students accepting positions with firms paying in excess of $130,000
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- moandersen
- Posts: 819
- Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2008 1:31 pm
Re: Fordham vs. Wake Forest ($$$)
Where did you get the 5.8% in NYC? I just looked at WFs website for the class of 2011 and ~5% of grads are working in the state of NY, which does not mean ~5% are working in NYC.Teflon_Jeff wrote:Meaning if he hustles and gets good grades (top 20%) he may have a decent shot. Not a good one, but decent.emarxnj wrote:How is 5.8% a decent shot?Teflon_Jeff wrote:
They placed 5.8% of grads into NYC, so if you hustle and get good grades, you have a decent shot. More importantly, with no debt, you'll be okay no matter what.
No debt to me means a decent shot is better than a good shot with Huge debt.
Also, you are being overly optimistic about top 20% + hustle = decent chance for NYC
OP, it sounds like you are K-JD from some of your comments. If so, definitely take a year off and work/retake the LSAT for better NYC options.
- top30man
- Posts: 1224
- Joined: Wed Sep 14, 2011 9:11 pm
Re: Fordham vs. Wake Forest ($$$)
TITCR. If OP could get into Fordham he likely could get a ton of money from Cardozo. But he could easily retake toget money from Fordham or even a better school. Going to WF for NYC makes no sense.moandersen wrote:Where did you get the 5.8% in NYC? I just looked at WFs website for the class of 2011 and ~5% of grads are working in the state of NY, which does not mean ~5% are working in NYC.Teflon_Jeff wrote:Meaning if he hustles and gets good grades (top 20%) he may have a decent shot. Not a good one, but decent.emarxnj wrote:How is 5.8% a decent shot?Teflon_Jeff wrote:
They placed 5.8% of grads into NYC, so if you hustle and get good grades, you have a decent shot. More importantly, with no debt, you'll be okay no matter what.
No debt to me means a decent shot is better than a good shot with Huge debt.
Also, you are being overly optimistic about top 20% + hustle = decent chance for NYC
OP, it sounds like you are K-JD from some of your comments. If so, definitely take a year off and work/retake the LSAT for better NYC options.
- Easy-E
- Posts: 6487
- Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2011 1:46 pm
Re: Fordham vs. Wake Forest ($$$)
Is the general consensus that the extra cost at Fordham isn't worth it's slightly higher Big Law placement (vs getting a large scholly at Cardozo)? Obviously neither is a stellar pick for Big Law hopefuls, but in terms of just those two, am I correct?
-
- Posts: 1651
- Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2012 10:42 am
Re: Fordham vs. Wake Forest ($$$)
The consensus is that there is no set of law interests a student could have (big law, small law, PI, etc) where Fordham at sticker makes sense given the placement of the school.emarxnj wrote:Is the general consensus that the extra cost at Fordham isn't worth it's slightly higher Big Law placement (vs getting a large scholly at Cardozo)? Obviously neither is a stellar pick for Big Law hopefuls, but in terms of just those two, am I correct?
- Easy-E
- Posts: 6487
- Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2011 1:46 pm
Re: Fordham vs. Wake Forest ($$$)
Hutz_and_Goodman wrote:The consensus is that there is no set of law interests a student could have (big law, small law, PI, etc) where Fordham at sticker makes sense given the placement of the school.emarxnj wrote:Is the general consensus that the extra cost at Fordham isn't worth it's slightly higher Big Law placement (vs getting a large scholly at Cardozo)? Obviously neither is a stellar pick for Big Law hopefuls, but in terms of just those two, am I correct?
Makes sense.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login