It goes deepet than this though. If the OP doesn't meet those grade cutoffs, the options are still far better at Columbia than UCLA.catch12 wrote:As someone from LA, I can tell you the difference in perception between UCLA and Columbia comes down to this:
The more prestigious LA firms' cutoffs are top half at Columbia and top third at UCLA. Being in those ranges doesn't guarantee a job, and people below that can get those jobs still, but you're talking about roughly, ROUGHLY a 15% higher chance at LA biglaw from Columbia.
Is that worth 75k to you? Thats the real decision, and obviously only you can make it.
I'd only take UCLA here if I could live with family to keep costs down and knew I had to be in California after law school.