+ infinityrinkrat19 wrote: OP, we don't know if this guy is actively trying to sabotage the lives of law school hopefuls or just an idiot, but his advice is consistently awful.
152/3.2, Best School I have a shot at? Forum
- law4vus

- Posts: 743
- Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 11:35 am
Re: 152/3.2, Best School I have a shot at?
- MachineLemon

- Posts: 375
- Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2011 9:47 am
Re: 152/3.2, Best School I have a shot at?
Perhaps we do: http://www.playdota.com/heroes/troll-warlordrinkrat19 wrote:OP, we don't know if this guy is actively trying to sabotage the lives of law school hopefuls or just an idiot, but his advice is consistently awful.Jah'rakal wrote:WSJ_Law wrote:OP: Cooley and Hamline are fine choices. Congratulations on such a stellar cycle.
hamline is ok, not really cooley, apply to a wide of range schools and then decide
- ColtsFan88

- Posts: 1431
- Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2011 5:05 pm
Re: 152/3.2, Best School I have a shot at?
You owe it to yourself to retake, especially since you weren't that serious about the LSAT the first two times. Study your ass off, and no joke you can get into a fantastic school (or a pretty good school for FREE). I had a 152, coupled with a stellar 3.2 GPA. I retook and am hoping for a Mich acceptance this cycle. It is possible for you to go to a great school still.
- johansantana21

- Posts: 855
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2011 7:11 pm
Re: 152/3.2, Best School I have a shot at?
Went from a 152 to a 177? My hats off to you.ColtsFan88 wrote:You owe it to yourself to retake, especially since you weren't that serious about the LSAT the first two times. Study your ass off, and no joke you can get into a fantastic school (or a pretty good school for FREE). I had a 152, coupled with a stellar 3.2 GPA. I retook and am hoping for a Mich acceptance this cycle. It is possible for you to go to a great school still.
- 20130312

- Posts: 3814
- Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2011 8:53 pm
Re: 152/3.2, Best School I have a shot at?
Good Lord, I agreejohansantana21 wrote:Went from a 152 to a 177? My hats off to you.ColtsFan88 wrote:You owe it to yourself to retake, especially since you weren't that serious about the LSAT the first two times. Study your ass off, and no joke you can get into a fantastic school (or a pretty good school for FREE). I had a 152, coupled with a stellar 3.2 GPA. I retook and am hoping for a Mich acceptance this cycle. It is possible for you to go to a great school still.
-
071816

- Posts: 5507
- Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2011 8:06 pm
Re: 152/3.2, Best School I have a shot at?
I've never seen a poster on this site give worse advice on a consistent basis than this guy. And that's saying a lot.Jah'rakal wrote:WSJ_Law wrote:OP: Cooley and Hamline are fine choices. Congratulations on such a stellar cycle.
hamline is ok, not really cooley, apply to a wide of range schools and then decide
- ColtsFan88

- Posts: 1431
- Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2011 5:05 pm
Re: 152/3.2, Best School I have a shot at?
Thanks. The pitheypike method is a godsend.johansantana21 wrote:Went from a 152 to a 177? My hats off to you.ColtsFan88 wrote:You owe it to yourself to retake, especially since you weren't that serious about the LSAT the first two times. Study your ass off, and no joke you can get into a fantastic school (or a pretty good school for FREE). I had a 152, coupled with a stellar 3.2 GPA. I retook and am hoping for a Mich acceptance this cycle. It is possible for you to go to a great school still.
- 89vision

- Posts: 431
- Joined: Sun Oct 09, 2011 5:49 pm
Re: 152/3.2, Best School I have a shot at?
I'm pretty sure it's all sarcastic.chimp wrote:I've never seen a poster on this site give worse advice on a consistent basis than this guy. And that's saying a lot.Jah'rakal wrote:WSJ_Law wrote:OP: Cooley and Hamline are fine choices. Congratulations on such a stellar cycle.
hamline is ok, not really cooley, apply to a wide of range schools and then decide
-
071816

- Posts: 5507
- Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2011 8:06 pm
Re: 152/3.2, Best School I have a shot at?
Based on post history it's hard to determine if troll or just extremely misinformed. Hope it's the former.89vision wrote:I'm pretty sure it's all sarcastic.chimp wrote:I've never seen a poster on this site give worse advice on a consistent basis than this guy. And that's saying a lot.Jah'rakal wrote:WSJ_Law wrote:OP: Cooley and Hamline are fine choices. Congratulations on such a stellar cycle.
hamline is ok, not really cooley, apply to a wide of range schools and then decide