because its the U of Chicago.pcwcecac wrote:Why is UChicago usually not TCR?
duh
because its the U of Chicago.pcwcecac wrote:Why is UChicago usually not TCR?
Just here to confirm Taipei as a Chicago troll. Complete with jabs at Northwestern and Stanford.TaipeiMort wrote:He was joking-- or maybe he goes to Northwestern.pcwcecac wrote:Why is UChicago usually not TCR?
Chicago is awesome, and does have the best law and econ program in the world, and invented it. Also, it is pretty good for academia-- I would place it right under HY and above S (probably because of the law and econ focus of the school).
It wasn't a jab at Northwestern, he goes to Northwestern doesn't he?, and you need to take anything a NU guy says about Chicago with a huge grain of salt. Also, Chicago may outplace Stanford in Academia... I really don't know. If you want trolling, I'll give you some:ahduth wrote:Just here to confirm Taipei as a Chicago troll. Complete with jabs at Northwestern and Stanford.TaipeiMort wrote:He was joking-- or maybe he goes to Northwestern.pcwcecac wrote:Why is UChicago usually not TCR?
Chicago is awesome, and does have the best law and econ program in the world, and invented it. Also, it is pretty good for academia-- I would place it right under HY and above S (probably because of the law and econ focus of the school).
This reminds me of Talladega nights.TaipeiMort wrote:It wasn't a jab at Northwestern, he goes to Northwestern doesn't he?, and you need to take anything a NU guy says about Chicago with a huge grain of salt. Also, Chicago may outplace Stanford in Academia... I really don't know. If you want trolling, I'll give you some:ahduth wrote:Just here to confirm Taipei as a Chicago troll. Complete with jabs at Northwestern and Stanford.TaipeiMort wrote:He was joking-- or maybe he goes to Northwestern.pcwcecac wrote:Why is UChicago usually not TCR?
Chicago is awesome, and does have the best law and econ program in the world, and invented it. Also, it is pretty good for academia-- I would place it right under HY and above S (probably because of the law and econ focus of the school).
The US News Rankings hugely undervalues Chicago, and (adjusting to remove the effects of law prestige) the rankings should be Yale, Chicago, Harvard, Stanford.
Evidence:
The most law firm partners, adjusted by class size, of any school-- Almost double the number of number 2 (Harvard).
More Supreme Court Clerks per capita than any school but Yale.
Objectively the best faculty in the country (The President, and two members of the Supreme Court taught there). Current faculty include Posner, Epstein, Easterbrook, Wood, Sunstein, and Baird.
The best law firm placement of any school (NLJ250).
Invented law and economics, the JD, and popularized the Socratic method.
Want to continue reading?
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
I LOL-ed. More and more I get the feeling that only thing UChicago student ever thinks about is "we're the shit but no one knows about it."Sentry wrote:
Ricky: Really, smarty-pants? What did French land give us?
Jean: We invented democracy, existentialism, and the blowjob.
pcwcecac wrote:Thanks Citizen. That's certainly a good suggestion.
I looked up vandy's program. They have a very high quality student body. I'm still looking for their job placement record though....
Thanks. I considered the JD/Econ PhD route myself and found that I wasn't commited enough to do it, but academia was not my primary end goal. While the rest of us are attending T14 programs at substantial cost (the real cost of sticker is somwhere around $300k), a joint PhD student usually has no out of pocket tuition costs and a stipend that covers a modest standard of living. A clerkship is not a prerequisite for an academic with a PhD and it seems feasible to complete a clership while working on a dissertation.pcwcecac wrote:a good point from bdub. And congrats on the NU joint program. It's efficient, to say the very very least.
I waived off the JD/PhD thought prematurely, mainly due to the length of the program. But academia is a long long journey; an extra 3-4 years investment might be trivial in the long run.
That said, 7 years + 2 years of clerkship (if I'm fortunate) YIKES! While bdub finishes 2 degrees in 3 years and spends the remaining 6 earning more money than I can ever accumulate. It really comes down to how much I want to be in academia, doesn't it?
Register now!
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
I would verify with the schools, but I believe that the university covers most if not all of the tuition for many joint JD/PhDs. Stanford has one of the more clear pages about this: http://www.law.stanford.edu/program/deg ... ancial_aid although it seems they expect you to pay for 1L with loans and then the PhD program covers the rest. This will probably vary from school to school a decent amount.pcwcecac wrote:4 years of coursework is absolutely doable. Clerkship + Dissertation sounds very ambitious, but in the meantime, may complement each other very well. I didn't realize that JD/PhD students need not to pay law tuition. This is a game-changer.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login