Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way. Forum
- kazu

- Posts: 1600
- Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2009 9:35 pm
Re: Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.
This is so going to end well.
- FuManChusco

- Posts: 1217
- Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 8:56 pm
Re: Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.
I don't know. top row, 2nd in. I'd take here for a ride on the bang train to pound town.Patriot1208 wrote:In all seriousness, there isn't one girl on that picture you posted who is better than average.sophia.olive wrote:really?..... what about bottom middle?Patriot1208 wrote:sophia.olive wrote:I swear im typing in english.
Dont be a dud.
I like top middle male for NYU.
Top three on the left for the girls.
ummm, ehhh,
- Patriot1208

- Posts: 7023
- Joined: Tue May 18, 2010 11:28 am
Re: Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.
govorett wrote:I'm interested as to why you think fat ugly girls would complain about sexism when they probably are never victims of it.
I think it depends on the definition of being a victim of sexism. I guess you could argue that it would be assumed less attractive women are smarter and therefore wouldn't be targeted...but that's just based on my experience with guys completely discrediting the fact that attractive women can be intelligent. In all honesty, sometimes it can work out in our favor...especially if they assume we are idiots and then realize we are not...
Ok, I was half joking before. I don't discredit girls intelligence when they are attractive, i'd love to find a very attractive and intelligent girl. I just discredit women because, they are women, and inherently inferior.
- paratactical

- Posts: 5885
- Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2009 1:06 pm
Re: Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.
Until women will admit to the henious injustices being done to men and start attempting to end sexism in all forms, even those they find beneficial, it can't possibly end well.kazu wrote:This is so going to end well.
- kazu

- Posts: 1600
- Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2009 9:35 pm
Re: Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.
paratactical wrote:Until women will admit to the henious injustices being done to men and start attempting to end sexism in all forms, even those they find beneficial, it can't possibly end well.kazu wrote:This is so going to end well.

Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- AreJay711

- Posts: 3406
- Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2010 8:51 pm
Re: Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.
Out of 476 people I hope they could pull a few attractive ones lol. Means nothing. I've heard Vandy has a lot of attractive southern girls and the interview system has only brought more in.sophia.olive wrote:This is not true.Patriot1208 wrote:We all know that only ugly and/or fat chicks are the only ones who complain about sexism.FuManChusco wrote:lulz. IBTL. the uptight female who ruined the last thread is actually headed to UCI I think. t20 bound my ass.
http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 1&t=140091
towards the bottom of page 1
I complain about sexism, but speculating about the attractivness of girls at a school is not sexism. males and females are attracted to each other, duh...
Thinking a girl is limited in mental ability because she is attractive is sexism. But that really goes both ways, if I see a guy that has that tan, cali look im going to think he is dumb at first. Also, not allowing girls to speculate about the attractivness of guys at schools, or at least viewing them differently from the guys that do it because of it, is sexest.
on that note- I imagine NYU has the best looking guys based of "the best looking guys at NYU
The girls actually look a little better than the guys.
anyways sorry, I know one girl that went to WUstl and she is about a 7.5. There no you can make a decision
oh... my friend just said he knows a girl that went there and she is fat. maybe a 5 he says.
It is probably preppy mid-western which is better than preppy east or west coast but still slightly annoying.
- gov

- Posts: 301
- Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2010 3:27 pm
Re: Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.
Good luck on your quest.Patriot1208 wrote:govorett wrote:I'm interested as to why you think fat ugly girls would complain about sexism when they probably are never victims of it.
I think it depends on the definition of being a victim of sexism. I guess you could argue that it would be assumed less attractive women are smarter and therefore wouldn't be targeted...but that's just based on my experience with guys completely discrediting the fact that attractive women can be intelligent. In all honesty, sometimes it can work out in our favor...especially if they assume we are idiots and then realize we are not...
Ok, I was half joking before. I don't discredit girls intelligence when they are attractive, i'd love to find a very attractive and intelligent girl. I just discredit women because, they are women, and inherently inferior.
-
d34d9823

- Posts: 1879
- Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 2:52 pm
Re: Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.
He just needs to tip his head back. Then all the water will flow into his face.kazu wrote:paratactical wrote:Until women will admit to the henious injustices being done to men and start attempting to end sexism in all forms, even those they find beneficial, it can't possibly end well.kazu wrote:This is so going to end well.
- kazu

- Posts: 1600
- Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2009 9:35 pm
Re: Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.
d34dluk3 wrote:He just needs to tip his head back. Then all the water will flow into his face.
- thelaststraw05

- Posts: 1028
- Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2010 7:47 am
Re: Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.
TITCR.d34dluk3 wrote:He just needs to tip his head back. Then all the water will flow into his face.kazu wrote:
- sophia.olive

- Posts: 885
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2010 11:38 pm
Re: Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.
I guess im smart, well numbers wise at least 178 summa Bio, and when I talk to people who dont really know me and I tell them im applying to blah blah school and got blah blah on blah they always seem shocked. I think there is that general idea that if you are unattractive you have to make up for it be being smart. If you are attractive and smart you are threatening and then people treat you in a sexist manner because they feel like they need to cut you down in order for you to respect them or for them to respect themselves.govorett wrote:I'm interested as to why you think fat ugly girls would complain about sexism when they probably are never victims of it.
I think it depends on the definition of being a victim of sexism. I guess you could argue that it would be assumed less attractive women are smarter and therefore wouldn't be targeted...but that's just based on my experience with guys completely discrediting the fact that attractive women can be intelligent. In all honesty, sometimes it can work out in our favor...especially if they assume we are idiots and then realize we are not...
- artichoke

- Posts: 760
- Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2010 11:20 pm
Re: Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.
I'm sure all of this male chauvinistic ignorance is totally due to the fact that all of you are incredibly attractive, highly intelligent beings
I would be willing to bet I wouldn't touch any of you with a ten foot pole, and not because you so obviously lack proper education.
I would be willing to bet I wouldn't touch any of you with a ten foot pole, and not because you so obviously lack proper education.
- paratactical

- Posts: 5885
- Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2009 1:06 pm
Re: Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.
Yet another member of the matriarchy continuing to oppress men everywhere, forcing all males to feel as though the very nature of their existance is an incursion against all things "sugar and spice and everything nice".kazu wrote:paratactical wrote:Until women will admit to the henious injustices being done to men and start attempting to end sexism in all forms, even those they find beneficial, it can't possibly end well.kazu wrote:This is so going to end well.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- gov

- Posts: 301
- Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2010 3:27 pm
Re: Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.
I agree. I just think it is funny and I really don't get offended by it. I prefer to go for the shock factor. Who really cares what they think anyway.sophia.olive wrote:I guess im smart, well numbers wise at least 178 summa Bio, and when I talk to people who dont really know me and I tell them im applying to blah blah school and got blah blah on blah they always seem shocked. I think there is that general idea that if you are unattractive you have to make up for it be being smart. If you are attractive and smart you are threatening and then people treat you in a sexist manner because they feel like they need to cut you down in order for you to respect them or for them to respect themselves.govorett wrote:I'm interested as to why you think fat ugly girls would complain about sexism when they probably are never victims of it.
I think it depends on the definition of being a victim of sexism. I guess you could argue that it would be assumed less attractive women are smarter and therefore wouldn't be targeted...but that's just based on my experience with guys completely discrediting the fact that attractive women can be intelligent. In all honesty, sometimes it can work out in our favor...especially if they assume we are idiots and then realize we are not...
- gov

- Posts: 301
- Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2010 3:27 pm
Re: Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.
+1 heheartichoke wrote:I'm sure all of this male chauvinistic ignorance is totally due to the fact that all of you are incredibly attractive, highly intelligent beings![]()
I would be willing to bet I wouldn't touch any of you with a ten foot pole, and not because you so obviously lack proper education.
- kazu

- Posts: 1600
- Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2009 9:35 pm
Re: Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.
paratactical wrote:Yet another member of the matriarchy continuing to oppress men everywhere, forcing all males to feel as though the very nature of their existance is an incursion against all things "sugar and spice and everything nice".

- paratactical

- Posts: 5885
- Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2009 1:06 pm
Re: Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.
You're a Michigan girl on the internet? Obviously fat. Probably an objective 3.5, if I had to guess.artichoke wrote:I'm sure all of this male chauvinistic ignorance is totally due to the fact that all of you are incredibly attractive, highly intelligent beings![]()
I would be willing to bet I wouldn't touch any of you with a ten foot pole, and not because you so obviously lack proper education.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- FuManChusco

- Posts: 1217
- Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 8:56 pm
Re: Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.
or maybe people cut you down because you're an arrogant bitch.govorett wrote:I agree. I just think it is funny and I really don't get offended by it. I prefer to go for the shock factor. Who really cares what they think anyway.sophia.olive wrote:I guess im smart, well numbers wise at least 178 summa Bio, and when I talk to people who dont really know me and I tell them im applying to blah blah school and got blah blah on blah they always seem shocked. I think there is that general idea that if you are unattractive you have to make up for it be being smart. If you are attractive and smart you are threatening and then people treat you in a sexist manner because they feel like they need to cut you down in order for you to respect them or for them to respect themselves.govorett wrote:I'm interested as to why you think fat ugly girls would complain about sexism when they probably are never victims of it.
I think it depends on the definition of being a victim of sexism. I guess you could argue that it would be assumed less attractive women are smarter and therefore wouldn't be targeted...but that's just based on my experience with guys completely discrediting the fact that attractive women can be intelligent. In all honesty, sometimes it can work out in our favor...especially if they assume we are idiots and then realize we are not...
- sophia.olive

- Posts: 885
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2010 11:38 pm
Re: Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.
If Patriot1208 does not think any of those girls are attractive he is probably still wondering around in a closet. That would explain his aggression towards females (an oppressive mother)
lol jk
lol jk
- gov

- Posts: 301
- Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2010 3:27 pm
Re: Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.
But I'm not :/ ...or maybe people cut you down because you're an arrogant bitch.
Last edited by gov on Wed Dec 08, 2010 1:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- mrmangs

- Posts: 674
- Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2010 1:28 pm
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- sophia.olive

- Posts: 885
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2010 11:38 pm
Re: Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.
"or maybe people cut you down because you're an arrogant bitch."
yeah
but honestly if I was a male it would have been
"or maybe people cut you down because you are confident"
but honestly if I was a male it would have been
"or maybe people cut you down because you are confident"
Last edited by sophia.olive on Wed Dec 08, 2010 1:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- artichoke

- Posts: 760
- Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2010 11:20 pm
Re: Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.
Even if I were, I would be totally unapologetic about that. Sounds like someone has some pent up aggression about their own looks if I had to guess...paratactical wrote:You're a Michigan girl on the internet? Obviously fat. Probably an objective 3.5, if I had to guess.artichoke wrote:I'm sure all of this male chauvinistic ignorance is totally due to the fact that all of you are incredibly attractive, highly intelligent beings![]()
I would be willing to bet I wouldn't touch any of you with a ten foot pole, and not because you so obviously lack proper education.
- thelaststraw05

- Posts: 1028
- Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2010 7:47 am
Re: Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.
As a guy, I'm just hoping that the guys in this thread are not representative of the guys in law school.
- FuManChusco

- Posts: 1217
- Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 8:56 pm
Re: Ok, let's try this again, but in a less controversial way.
oh look, it's mr. sympathetic. hope that takes you far in life.thelaststraw05 wrote:As a guy, I'm just hoping that the guys in this thread are not representative of the guys in law school.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login