I think the TT was a subliminal slip.Desert Fox wrote:IIT. A respectable school in Chicago.Blindmelon wrote:Wait... does ITT Tech have a law school? Did I miss something? If its ITT tech I'd stay away and re-take.CanadianWolf wrote:Take the ITT Chicago-Kent College of Law offer and if you do well your first year & are unhappy, then transfer. Earlier today I posted rankings combining USNews scores with National Law Journal large firm placement results. Although I did not include ITT Chicago-Kent in the list of the top 48 law schools, it would have ranked forty ninth (49th) as I noted in a later post. Even though large law firm placement is not a primary objective for you, obviously employers respect this law school.
Kent refuses to take no for an answer (Kent $$$ v try again) Forum
- TCScrutinizer

- Posts: 497
- Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2009 11:01 pm
Re: Kent refuses to take no for an answer (Kent $$$ v try again)
- PlugInBaby

- Posts: 386
- Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2010 1:40 am
Re: Kent refuses to take no for an answer (Kent $$$ v try again)
I'm certainly leaning toward turning down the offer and retrying. The only worry is having to explain the year of unemployment (or not..some schools don't bother asking) in the next cycle. However with a better LSAT score and a far improved PS and earlier applications I would think I'd be in a much better position to have a more successful cycle than last.
How much do I need to worry (if I even have to worry) about that gap in my resume?
How much do I need to worry (if I even have to worry) about that gap in my resume?
-
09042014

- Posts: 18203
- Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:47 pm
Re: Kent refuses to take no for an answer (Kent $$$ v try again)
Find a job doing something in the mean time.PlugInBaby wrote:I'm certainly leaning toward turning down the offer and retrying. The only worry is having to explain the year of unemployment (or not..some schools don't bother asking) in the next cycle. However with a better LSAT score and a far improved PS and earlier applications I would think I'd be in a much better position to have a more successful cycle than last.
How much do I need to worry (if I even have to worry) about that gap in my resume?
- Luis Gomez

- Posts: 429
- Joined: Sat Sep 19, 2009 11:22 pm
Re: Kent refuses to take no for an answer (Kent $$$ v try again)
Better yet, find a job doing nothing .Desert Fox wrote:Find a job doing something in the mean time.PlugInBaby wrote:I'm certainly leaning toward turning down the offer and retrying. The only worry is having to explain the year of unemployment (or not..some schools don't bother asking) in the next cycle. However with a better LSAT score and a far improved PS and earlier applications I would think I'd be in a much better position to have a more successful cycle than last.
How much do I need to worry (if I even have to worry) about that gap in my resume?
-
Case2L

- Posts: 203
- Joined: Sun Dec 10, 2006 1:05 pm
Re: Kent refuses to take no for an answer (Kent $$$ v try again)
Maybe I missed something - did you apply to Seattle University? It seems like your numbers should get you some money form Seattle U.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- PlugInBaby

- Posts: 386
- Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2010 1:40 am
Re: Kent refuses to take no for an answer (Kent $$$ v try again)
I did apply to Seattle U and got waitlisted. This is only my speculation but I think some schools find it easier to YP those with a criminal record (and perhaps someone who lives a fair distance away).Case2L wrote:Maybe I missed something - did you apply to Seattle University? It seems like your numbers should get you some money form Seattle U.
-
JOThompson

- Posts: 1391
- Joined: Sun Aug 02, 2009 3:16 am
Re: Kent refuses to take no for an answer (Kent $$$ v try again)
Retake the LSAT if you feel you can improve by three or more points IMO. Otherwise, Kent is a respectable school and you have a decent offer there.
I wouldn't worry about the employment gap. I spent the nine months between undergrad and application season rather unproductively. The vast majority of schools didn't inquire about my activities during the downtime.
As for the criminal record, I feel that can make your cycle very unpredictable. I centered my application theme around my involvement with the criminal justice system (Dad was under investigation, IRS-CID crashed through my door, I visited him in prison 50+ times, I represented him in IRS administrative appeals, so on). It's a red herring for some adcomms, but other schools will see the value of your unique perspective. Some of my safeties outright rejected me and I feel my risky PS was the issue, but others schools gave me a more than fair shake. Just a matter of how well you explain your background.
I wouldn't worry about the employment gap. I spent the nine months between undergrad and application season rather unproductively. The vast majority of schools didn't inquire about my activities during the downtime.
As for the criminal record, I feel that can make your cycle very unpredictable. I centered my application theme around my involvement with the criminal justice system (Dad was under investigation, IRS-CID crashed through my door, I visited him in prison 50+ times, I represented him in IRS administrative appeals, so on). It's a red herring for some adcomms, but other schools will see the value of your unique perspective. Some of my safeties outright rejected me and I feel my risky PS was the issue, but others schools gave me a more than fair shake. Just a matter of how well you explain your background.
-
yeff

- Posts: 333
- Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 2:32 pm
Re: Kent refuses to take no for an answer (Kent $$$ v try again)
Schools seem to care a lot more about your LSAT than the length of your unemployment.
What are you scoring consistently on recent practice tests?
What are you scoring consistently on recent practice tests?
-
09042014

- Posts: 18203
- Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:47 pm
Re: Kent refuses to take no for an answer (Kent $$$ v try again)
Here is what I'd do if I were you.
Get a job doing whatever you can. I don't care if its road construction.
Deposit at Chi-Kent. Study your ass off for June.
Get 166-168. Then apply ED at Northwestern, and on the application you'll be able to put 1 year work experience upon matriculation.
If in June you don't do better take the money and go to school.
Get a job doing whatever you can. I don't care if its road construction.
Deposit at Chi-Kent. Study your ass off for June.
Get 166-168. Then apply ED at Northwestern, and on the application you'll be able to put 1 year work experience upon matriculation.
If in June you don't do better take the money and go to school.
-
ToTransferOrNot

- Posts: 1923
- Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2009 12:45 am
Re: Kent refuses to take no for an answer (Kent $$$ v try again)
+1Desert Fox wrote:Here is what I'd do if I were you.
Get a job doing whatever you can. I don't care if its road construction.
Deposit at Chi-Kent. Study your ass off for June.
Get 166-168. Then apply ED at Northwestern, and on the application you'll be able to put 1 year work experience upon matriculation.
If in June you don't do better take the money and go to school.
- Luis Gomez

- Posts: 429
- Joined: Sat Sep 19, 2009 11:22 pm
Re: Kent refuses to take no for an answer (Kent $$$ v try again)
+2ToTransferOrNot wrote:+1Desert Fox wrote:Here is what I'd do if I were you.
Get a job doing whatever you can. I don't care if its road construction.
Deposit at Chi-Kent. Study your ass off for June.
Get 166-168. Then apply ED at Northwestern, and on the application you'll be able to put 1 year work experience upon matriculation.
If in June you don't do better take the money and go to school.
- TCScrutinizer

- Posts: 497
- Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2009 11:01 pm
Re: Kent refuses to take no for an answer (Kent $$$ v try again)
TITCR, but I'd feel most comfortable with a 170 at least for NU.Desert Fox wrote:Here is what I'd do if I were you.
Get a job doing whatever you can. I don't care if its road construction.
Deposit at Chi-Kent. Study your ass off for June.
Get 166-168. Then apply ED at Northwestern, and on the application you'll be able to put 1 year work experience upon matriculation.
If in June you don't do better take the money and go to school.
- PlugInBaby

- Posts: 386
- Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2010 1:40 am
Re: Kent refuses to take no for an answer (Kent $$$ v try again)
I have decided not to deposit at Chicago-Kent. With the mistakes I made in the application cycle, I knew I couldn't be satisified with any of my remaining options even if my LSAT score does not improve (which I find highly unlikely). I just have to redo my cycle completely and this time learn from my mistakes.
Will be looking for full time work shortly after the LSAT....now I am afraid of Target YPing me.
As for where I will apply next time around...that all depends on the score I get...doubt I would ED at Northwestern though considering how high their sticker price is (as compared to U of Washington which has a much much lower sticker price and I would prefer Seattle anyway). Maybe an ED at Chicago if I knock the LSAT out of the park.
Thanks for the input all!
Will be looking for full time work shortly after the LSAT....now I am afraid of Target YPing me.
As for where I will apply next time around...that all depends on the score I get...doubt I would ED at Northwestern though considering how high their sticker price is (as compared to U of Washington which has a much much lower sticker price and I would prefer Seattle anyway). Maybe an ED at Chicago if I knock the LSAT out of the park.
Thanks for the input all!
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Ford Prefect

- Posts: 475
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2010 2:30 pm
Re: Kent refuses to take no for an answer (Kent $$$ v try again)
Good luck. I'm sure it will work out.
- holydonkey

- Posts: 1181
- Joined: Fri Dec 18, 2009 1:40 pm
Re: Kent refuses to take no for an answer (Kent $$$ v try again)
PlugInBaby wrote:Kent refuses to take no for an answer

- quickquestionthanks

- Posts: 632
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2010 7:30 pm
Re: Kent refuses to take no for an answer (Kent $$$ v try again)
You made the right decision. If you're not going to be content at Kent, no reason to deposit.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login