Feels good to be decided. Here's to hoping we can study together this year (in section C or D!...)scottidsntknow wrote:It's Friday...
WUSTL $$$ v NU @ Sticker - Resolved 6/27/14 Forum
-
workaholic82

- Posts: 223
- Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2013 11:29 pm
Re: MUST DECIDE BY FRIDAY - PLEASE HELP
- Fiero85

- Posts: 1983
- Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2013 3:38 am
Re: MUST DECIDE BY FRIDAY - PLEASE HELP
Nice bro, congrats on getting thru a tough decision. See you in the fall!
- chuckbass

- Posts: 9956
- Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2011 9:29 pm
Re: MUST DECIDE BY FRIDAY - PLEASE HELP
Yes hooray! Also I can add you to the c/I 2017 threadworkaholic82 wrote:Feels good to be decided. Here's to hoping we can study together this year (in section C or D!...)scottidsntknow wrote:It's Friday...
- Micdiddy

- Posts: 2231
- Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2012 3:38 pm
Re: MUST DECIDE BY FRIDAY - PLEASE HELP
Good decision and good luck!workaholic82 wrote:Haha, well...I'm officially a WUSTLUT. Many thanks to everyone for your advice, this community is awesome. I could not commit to $250,000.00+ in debt with all the potential pitfalls that could arise.Micdiddy wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kfVsfOSbJY0&feature=kp
- Onomatopoeia

- Posts: 4698
- Joined: Sat Apr 12, 2014 12:04 am
Re: MUST DECIDE BY FRIDAY - PLEASE HELP
You're gonna kill it at wustl and be working with a uchicago/nu bro drowning in debt as u profit. Dont look back. The risk for u now is having bottom 1/3 to 1/4 grades. Basically don't slack off bc of the scholly cushion u haveworkaholic82 wrote:Feels good to be decided. Here's to hoping we can study together this year (in section C or D!...)scottidsntknow wrote:It's Friday...
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
workaholic82

- Posts: 223
- Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2013 11:29 pm
Re: MUST DECIDE BY FRIDAY - PLEASE HELP
Thanks man, looking forward to itFiero85 wrote:Nice bro, congrats on getting thru a tough decision. See you in the fall!
-
workaholic82

- Posts: 223
- Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2013 11:29 pm
Re: MUST DECIDE BY FRIDAY - PLEASE HELP
Thanks, sign me up!scottidsntknow wrote:Yes hooray! Also I can add you to the c/I 2017 threadworkaholic82 wrote:Feels good to be decided. Here's to hoping we can study together this year (in section C or D!...)scottidsntknow wrote:It's Friday...
- DoveBodyWash

- Posts: 3177
- Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2011 4:12 pm
Re: MUST DECIDE BY FRIDAY - PLEASE HELP
You will experience last minute prestige pangs. Remember to stay the course. Congrats tho
-
workaholic82

- Posts: 223
- Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2013 11:29 pm
Re: MUST DECIDE BY FRIDAY - PLEASE HELP
Thanks diddy... i regret missing out on that beer, but it's good to know there's good folk like you around.Micdiddy wrote:Good decision and good luck!workaholic82 wrote:Haha, well...I'm officially a WUSTLUT. Many thanks to everyone for your advice, this community is awesome. I could not commit to $250,000.00+ in debt with all the potential pitfalls that could arise.Micdiddy wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kfVsfOSbJY0&feature=kp
-
workaholic82

- Posts: 223
- Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2013 11:29 pm
Re: MUST DECIDE BY FRIDAY - PLEASE HELP
Absolutely. Your advice was difference-making, thanks much!BornAgain99 wrote:You're gonna kill it at wustl and be working with a uchicago/nu bro drowning in debt as u profit. Dont look back. The risk for u now is having bottom 1/3 to 1/4 grades. Basically don't slack off bc of the scholly cushion u haveworkaholic82 wrote:Feels good to be decided. Here's to hoping we can study together this year (in section C or D!...)scottidsntknow wrote:It's Friday...
-
workaholic82

- Posts: 223
- Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2013 11:29 pm
Re: MUST DECIDE BY FRIDAY - PLEASE HELP
No doubt, but if i kill it i can reach higher levels of prestige than NU if i go the transfer route. If not, then it isn't meant to be. I'll definitely stay the course regardless. You and other extraordinary rising 2L's are a big bonus of attending WUSTL. Thanks for your help thus far.cusenation wrote:You will experience last minute prestige pangs. Remember to stay the course. Congrats tho
-
03152016

- Posts: 9180
- Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2011 3:14 am
Re: MUST DECIDE BY FRIDAY - PLEASE HELP
great callworkaholic82 wrote:Haha, well...I'm officially a WUSTLUT. Many thanks to everyone for your advice, this community is awesome. I could not commit to $250,000.00+ in debt with all the potential pitfalls that could arise.Micdiddy wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kfVsfOSbJY0&feature=kp
wustl full ride is a tremendous outcome
-
workaholic82

- Posts: 223
- Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2013 11:29 pm
Re: MUST DECIDE BY FRIDAY - PLEASE HELP
Thank you man. I feel like i should expect a $350.00 bill in the mail for the financial projection you made for me, but i guess this is good practice for you so you can bill mad rates later... in any event, you are awesome, thank you.Brut wrote:great callworkaholic82 wrote:Haha, well...I'm officially a WUSTLUT. Many thanks to everyone for your advice, this community is awesome. I could not commit to $250,000.00+ in debt with all the potential pitfalls that could arise.Micdiddy wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kfVsfOSbJY0&feature=kp
wustl full ride is a tremendous outcome
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- ManoftheHour

- Posts: 3486
- Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2013 6:03 pm
Re: MUST DECIDE BY FRIDAY - PLEASE HELP
The thing about fucking up at WUSTL with a full ride is that you still have the chance to do something else and perhaps live okayish. If you fuck up with sticker debt, you done, son.
Congrats, OP. May the odds be in your favor.
Congrats, OP. May the odds be in your favor.
-
workaholic82

- Posts: 223
- Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2013 11:29 pm
Re: MUST DECIDE BY FRIDAY - PLEASE HELP
Thank you MOH, i will really try to tip the scales in my favor any way i can (without being too overly gunnerish)... Thanks for your help.ManoftheHour wrote:The thing about fucking up at WUSTL with a full ride is that you still have the chance to do something else and perhaps live okayish. If you fuck up with sticker debt, you done, son.
Congrats, OP. May the odds be in your favor.
- chuckbass

- Posts: 9956
- Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2011 9:29 pm
Re: MUST DECIDE BY FRIDAY - PLEASE HELP
I mean I think your username hints to gunner tendencies alreadyworkaholic82 wrote:Thank you MOH, i will really try to tip the scales in my favor any way i can (without being too overly gunnerish)... Thanks for your help.ManoftheHour wrote:The thing about fucking up at WUSTL with a full ride is that you still have the chance to do something else and perhaps live okayish. If you fuck up with sticker debt, you done, son.
Congrats, OP. May the odds be in your favor.
- Zero99

- Posts: 61
- Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2014 3:56 pm
Re: MUST DECIDE BY FRIDAY - PLEASE HELP
To add one more voice, I was in a similar situation last year and went with the full ride. Haven't regretted it at all. The ability to go through school without the added pressure of debt is an amazing feeling. Just do what you have to do for biglaw, but know that you aren't fucked if it doesn't work out. Best of luck man. If the decision to take wustl doesn't feel good now, I promise it will once the year starts.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- kennethellenparcell

- Posts: 498
- Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2010 1:02 am
Re: MUST DECIDE BY FRIDAY - PLEASE HELP
OP, I think you made a great decision and you really couldn't go wrong. Both options are great to have and the amount of debt you'd have from NU is a huge consideration. However, I'd like to correct the record for people making this decision in the future. I've done the summer associate thing twice and worked in law firms (small, big and mid size) for three years before I went to law school.cusenation wrote:1. Lay prestige. NU has a weird cult following in Chicago. Partly cuz NU kids think it matters that they are "cooler" than the UChicago kids. Mostly because the Midwest lacks elite schools in general so NU looks better by comparison. In the northeast no one worships it like they do in Chicago. WUSTL and NU lay prestige is pretty much same at least out here. Aka they are both schools you go to when you don't get into an Ivy and too proud or poor for BU or NYU.workaholic82 wrote:About similar prestige, improving prospects at wash u and shot at big law anywhere above median? It just seems like your general sentiments went counter to his...cusenation wrote:
Sorry what specifically are you referring to
2. Median prospects. Depends on how you define biglaw. Almost zero chance you get 160k unless you're IP or have some kind of internal connection. But 100k+ is still doable. Biglaw in the Midwest pays less than the coastal firms. You could also get midlaw that pays decent. Yes midlaw exists. But the hiring process for those firms aren't as rigid or formal so it's harder for me to say what will happen.
1. I agree with regard to lay prestige. However, once you get into the legal community - while your work does speak for itself and the law school you went to matters less - it does still matter. People lateral so much to other firms that interviewing attorneys I've spoke to in this process say it does matter in their mind if the person went to a T14 versus a lower ranked school. The only T14s that really impress them, however, are Yale and Harvard. Not sure why Stanford wasn't on the list. I've also noticed that lots of big law firms hire from T14s because the name reflects something to their clients. Not to say that someone not from a T14 wouldn't be respected for crushing it (crushing it in any school is hard) but that is a reality, in my opinion.
2. Once you're at median, OCI depends so much on personality that someone with a 3.3 can absolutely crush it with a zillion callbacks, and someone with a 3.7 can get like 2 callbacks. Being at a T14 opens up many more doors in terms of interviewing opportunities - that is a reality. Whether or not that's worth $200,000 is up to each individual person.
-
workaholic82

- Posts: 223
- Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2013 11:29 pm
Re: MUST DECIDE BY FRIDAY - PLEASE HELP
Lol true, but it's kind of ironic because of my lack of gunnerishness to this point in my life.scottidsntknow wrote:I mean I think your username hints to gunner tendencies alreadyworkaholic82 wrote:Thank you MOH, i will really try to tip the scales in my favor any way i can (without being too overly gunnerish)... Thanks for your help.ManoftheHour wrote:The thing about fucking up at WUSTL with a full ride is that you still have the chance to do something else and perhaps live okayish. If you fuck up with sticker debt, you done, son.
Congrats, OP. May the odds be in your favor.
-
workaholic82

- Posts: 223
- Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2013 11:29 pm
Re: MUST DECIDE BY FRIDAY - PLEASE HELP
Thanks man, actually starting to feel good about it already.Zero99 wrote:To add one more voice, I was in a similar situation last year and went with the full ride. Haven't regretted it at all. The ability to go through school without the added pressure of debt is an amazing feeling. Just do what you have to do for biglaw, but know that you aren't fucked if it doesn't work out. Best of luck man. If the decision to take wustl doesn't feel good now, I promise it will once the year starts.
-
workaholic82

- Posts: 223
- Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2013 11:29 pm
Re: MUST DECIDE BY FRIDAY - PLEASE HELP
Thanks... a bit of a drizzle on my parade, but it's not all doom and gloom... thanks for the insight.kennethellenparcell wrote:OP, I think you made a great decision and you really couldn't go wrong. Both options are great to have and the amount of debt you'd have from NU is a huge consideration. However, I'd like to correct the record for people making this decision in the future. I've done the summer associate thing twice and worked in law firms (small, big and mid size) for three years before I went to law school.cusenation wrote:1. Lay prestige. NU has a weird cult following in Chicago. Partly cuz NU kids think it matters that they are "cooler" than the UChicago kids. Mostly because the Midwest lacks elite schools in general so NU looks better by comparison. In the northeast no one worships it like they do in Chicago. WUSTL and NU lay prestige is pretty much same at least out here. Aka they are both schools you go to when you don't get into an Ivy and too proud or poor for BU or NYU.workaholic82 wrote:About similar prestige, improving prospects at wash u and shot at big law anywhere above median? It just seems like your general sentiments went counter to his...cusenation wrote:
Sorry what specifically are you referring to
2. Median prospects. Depends on how you define biglaw. Almost zero chance you get 160k unless you're IP or have some kind of internal connection. But 100k+ is still doable. Biglaw in the Midwest pays less than the coastal firms. You could also get midlaw that pays decent. Yes midlaw exists. But the hiring process for those firms aren't as rigid or formal so it's harder for me to say what will happen.
1. I agree with regard to lay prestige. However, once you get into the legal community - while your work does speak for itself and the law school you went to matters less - it does still matter. People lateral so much to other firms that interviewing attorneys I've spoke to in this process say it does matter in their mind if the person went to a T14 versus a lower ranked school. The only T14s that really impress them, however, are Yale and Harvard. Not sure why Stanford wasn't on the list. I've also noticed that lots of big law firms hire from T14s because the name reflects something to their clients. Not to say that someone not from a T14 wouldn't be respected for crushing it (crushing it in any school is hard) but that is a reality, in my opinion.
2. Once you're at median, OCI depends so much on personality that someone with a 3.3 can absolutely crush it with a zillion callbacks, and someone with a 3.7 can get like 2 callbacks. Being at a T14 opens up many more doors in terms of interviewing opportunities - that is a reality. Whether or not that's worth $200,000 is up to each individual person.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
Informative

- Posts: 438
- Joined: Mon Apr 05, 2010 6:10 pm
Re: WUSTL $$$ v NU @ Sticker - Resolved 6/27/14
The debt differential here is significant. Graduating from WUSTL with over six figures in debt is crazy. You've only got an 18% shot at biglaw, and we're not talking biglaw positions with $160k salaries. We're talking midwest biglaw outside of Chicago. I would steer clear of this option.
However, I would also steer clear of NU with 250k+ in debt. That is way too much dischargeable debt. While you'll likely get a biglaw position from NU, you are going to be handicapped for the first three years with all the debt.
You may want to look at schools ranked between these two options that offer you better scholarships...or save up some cash over a year and re-apply.
However, I would also steer clear of NU with 250k+ in debt. That is way too much dischargeable debt. While you'll likely get a biglaw position from NU, you are going to be handicapped for the first three years with all the debt.
You may want to look at schools ranked between these two options that offer you better scholarships...or save up some cash over a year and re-apply.
- chuckbass

- Posts: 9956
- Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2011 9:29 pm
Re: WUSTL $$$ v NU @ Sticker - Resolved 6/27/14
WUSTL's biglaw placement isn't amazing, but it's not nearly as awful as what you just posted. C/O 2013 had 29% FYI.Informative wrote:The debt differential here is significant. Graduating from WUSTL with over six figures in debt is crazy. You've only got an 18% shot at biglaw, and we're not talking biglaw positions with $160k salaries. We're talking midwest biglaw outside of Chicago. I would steer clear of this option.
However, I would also steer clear of NU with 250k+ in debt. That is way too much dischargeable debt. While you'll likely get a biglaw position from NU, you are going to be handicapped for the first three years with all the debt.
You may want to look at schools ranked between these two options that offer you better scholarships...or save up some cash over a year and re-apply.
- jbagelboy

- Posts: 10361
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm
Re: WUSTL $$$ v NU @ Sticker - Resolved 6/27/14
As usual, you come in after a decision has been made and drop some stale wisdom that barely qualifies as 'informative'.Informative wrote:The debt differential here is significant. Graduating from WUSTL with over six figures in debt is crazy. You've only got an 18% shot at biglaw, and we're not talking biglaw positions with $160k salaries. We're talking midwest biglaw outside of Chicago. I would steer clear of this option.
However, I would also steer clear of NU with 250k+ in debt. That is way too much dischargeable debt. While you'll likely get a biglaw position from NU, you are going to be handicapped for the first three years with all the debt.
You may want to look at schools ranked between these two options that offer you better scholarships...or save up some cash over a year and re-apply.
1) OP already has $35K in undergraduate loans, so they're only paying CoL & change at washington university. They'll graduate with substantial debt regardless of where they attend, or they'll have to start servicing the obligation immediately on a presumably part time or clerical salary. If OP wants to practice law within the next few years, this is the best way to overcome their deplorable college record.
2) OP is an extreme splitter, and has landed two of the most splitter friendly options. There just aren't schools "ranked between these two options" (not sure why you cite 'rankings') that would offer comparable scholarship to WashU or large firm employment to Northwestern. OP's only other option would be to attend a peer school to WashU with worse placement in the target market, such as Minnesota or GW, for similar (or in GW's case, more) debt. Can't see how that's an improvement.
3) Even your statements about NU display flawed analysis, but it's beside the point so I won't go into it.
In other words, your perspective ignores the facts, distorts the placement data, and gives specious, impossible advise, not to mention that OP has already made a decision.
-
workaholic82

- Posts: 223
- Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2013 11:29 pm
Re: WUSTL $$$ v NU @ Sticker - Resolved 6/27/14
Thanks man. I think the truth is somewhere between your two figures, because it's true a certain percentage of that 29% is earmarked for IP and URM candidates, but i doubt it's 1/3.scottidsntknow wrote:WUSTL's biglaw placement isn't amazing, but it's not nearly as awful as what you just posted. C/O 2013 had 29% FYI.Informative wrote:The debt differential here is significant. Graduating from WUSTL with over six figures in debt is crazy. You've only got an 18% shot at biglaw, and we're not talking biglaw positions with $160k salaries. We're talking midwest biglaw outside of Chicago. I would steer clear of this option.
However, I would also steer clear of NU with 250k+ in debt. That is way too much dischargeable debt. While you'll likely get a biglaw position from NU, you are going to be handicapped for the first three years with all the debt.
You may want to look at schools ranked between these two options that offer you better scholarships...or save up some cash over a year and re-apply.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login