He may as well withdraw now, it's not like he's going to give them a chance at this point.prefontaine wrote:Wouldn't it be best to see if he gets accepted off of the waitlist, and to send the letter at that time? Or is that the plan, and I just missed it?
Berkeley Haters Forum
- vanwinkle
- Posts: 8953
- Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 3:02 am
Re: Berkeley Haters
-
- Posts: 443
- Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 9:42 pm
Re: Berkeley Haters
bolded is very credited. And for the record, people in Chicago don't give two shits about new york. Personally, I'm from neither city, but love both. People from NYC seem to have this mean streak about them trying to yell about how much better their city is than everywhere (even converted west coasters), and they all fail to realize that nobody cares but them. I think if anything, the lack of that prevailing arrogant attitude makes chicago>nyc in my book.rayiner wrote:Read the link. NY is by far the state with the most extreme outflux of residents.
As for New York versus Chicago:
New York has more of the stuff common people don't care about: art, culture, etc.
Chicago has less of the stuff that common people dislike: intellectuals, artists, foreigners, etc, and more of the stuff they do: sausage, deep dish pizza, etc.
The village is fucking awesome though.
-
- Posts: 40
- Joined: Thu Dec 10, 2009 11:11 am
Re: Berkeley Haters
I'm thinking that in his vengeance he might want to hurt their numbers...
Last edited by prefontaine on Tue Jan 26, 2010 5:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 94
- Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 9:16 pm
Re: Berkeley Haters
Hate to do this, but:rayiner wrote: If NY is so great, why is everyone leaving?
New York Metro Area ≠ New York City. NYC is actually gaining residents:
http://www.nyc.gov/html/dcp/html/census/popcur.shtml
And take a wild guess at which city is estimated to have lost population between 2000 and 2008?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_Chicago
It's no NYC, but LA transit gets a bad rap. I spent a couple of months there without a car and did just fine. If you live on the gold or red lines the subway is quick and surprisingly comprehensive. If you're not on the metro the bus works much better than expected. I only ran into trouble when I was out drinking late.crackberry wrote:As a native New Yorker, I would also hate the lack of efficient/meaningful public transportation.
Last edited by drsomebody on Tue Jan 26, 2010 5:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 644
- Joined: Sun Sep 06, 2009 12:09 pm
Re: Berkeley Haters
New York has a leg up over chicago in nightlife, and art,
But Chicago has better COL, it's less crowded, a lake you can swim in, Better Architecture, parks that arent filled with joggin moms pushing strollers, bums, and lawyers pretending to be lance armstrong(ironic because i'm a cyclist who wants to be a lawyer)
both Chicago and New York have great food, hard to say which i like better. But NYC pizza over chicago any day. Deep dish is amazing, but not even a monthly thing. Hotdogs are better in chicago though, so are bugers(Kuma's Corner for the win)
Anyway, i moved to California for a reason. Bay Area is great, LA is ok. San diego = snooze fest.
Also, Chicago like newyork, has a bar on every street and corner. I think the city used to have the highes per captita in America.
Also chicago has the worst police force after early 90s LA.
But Chicago has better COL, it's less crowded, a lake you can swim in, Better Architecture, parks that arent filled with joggin moms pushing strollers, bums, and lawyers pretending to be lance armstrong(ironic because i'm a cyclist who wants to be a lawyer)
both Chicago and New York have great food, hard to say which i like better. But NYC pizza over chicago any day. Deep dish is amazing, but not even a monthly thing. Hotdogs are better in chicago though, so are bugers(Kuma's Corner for the win)
Anyway, i moved to California for a reason. Bay Area is great, LA is ok. San diego = snooze fest.
Also, Chicago like newyork, has a bar on every street and corner. I think the city used to have the highes per captita in America.
Also chicago has the worst police force after early 90s LA.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 644
- Joined: Sun Sep 06, 2009 12:09 pm
Re: Berkeley Haters
TITCR, as someone born and raised in Chicago, no one cares about NYC, at least not negitvely. Most of Chicago's younger population is transient anyway, or from rural Midwest, so the don't have any chips on thier shoulders.ughOSU wrote:bolded is very credited. And for the record, people in Chicago don't give two shits about new york. Personally, I'm from neither city, but love both. People from NYC seem to have this mean streak about them trying to yell about how much better their city is than everywhere (even converted west coasters), and they all fail to realize that nobody cares but them. I think if anything, the lack of that prevailing arrogant attitude makes chicago>nyc in my book.rayiner wrote:Read the link. NY is by far the state with the most extreme outflux of residents.
As for New York versus Chicago:
New York has more of the stuff common people don't care about: art, culture, etc.
Chicago has less of the stuff that common people dislike: intellectuals, artists, foreigners, etc, and more of the stuff they do: sausage, deep dish pizza, etc.
The village is fucking awesome though.
-
- Posts: 18203
- Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:47 pm
Re: Berkeley Haters
Like beat up minorities worst, or least effective?Oban wrote: Also chicago has the worst police force after early 90s LA.
I just like they don't use radar guns catch speeders.
- vanwinkle
- Posts: 8953
- Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 3:02 am
Re: Berkeley Haters
You must just know people that suck.ughOSU wrote:bolded is very credited. And for the record, people in Chicago don't give two shits about new york. Personally, I'm from neither city, but love both. People from NYC seem to have this mean streak about them trying to yell about how much better their city is than everywhere (even converted west coasters), and they all fail to realize that nobody cares but them. I think if anything, the lack of that prevailing arrogant attitude makes chicago>nyc in my book.rayiner wrote:Read the link. NY is by far the state with the most extreme outflux of residents.
As for New York versus Chicago:
New York has more of the stuff common people don't care about: art, culture, etc.
Chicago has less of the stuff that common people dislike: intellectuals, artists, foreigners, etc, and more of the stuff they do: sausage, deep dish pizza, etc.
Also, wtf is this about "common people"? And disliking "foreigners"? WTF? I guess by "common people" you mean "middle-class white Republicans"... NYC has awesome things to do for people of just about any background or income level. Also, NYC has the most awesome food in the world. There are restaurants offering every kind of food in the world, there's 16 different kinds of Asian food, Polish, German, and Bulgarian restaurants... hell, NYC is the only place I've ever encountered Ethiopian food, and it's awesome.
NYC is also the only place I've ever seen a macaroni-and-cheese restaurant. They have everything there.
This is what you make me think about when you talk about "common people":
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HKbt3wRsZYw
- crackberry
- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: Berkeley Haters
Lots of Ethiopian food in the Adams Morgan/U-Street neighborhoods in DC.vanwinkle wrote:[hell, NYC is the only place I've ever encountered Ethiopian food, and it's awesome.
- vanwinkle
- Posts: 8953
- Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 3:02 am
Re: Berkeley Haters
You know what, now that I think about that I've heard that before.crackberry wrote:Lots of Ethiopian food in the Adams Morgan/U-Street neighborhoods in DC.vanwinkle wrote:[hell, NYC is the only place I've ever encountered Ethiopian food, and it's awesome.
I'd consider living in DC, though it's a swamp and in the summer you have to deal with the mosquitoes and humidity.
- crackberry
- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: Berkeley Haters
I don't remember there being very many mosquitoes, but it is definitely humid - definitely worse summer weather than NYC.vanwinkle wrote:You know what, now that I think about that I've heard that before.crackberry wrote:Lots of Ethiopian food in the Adams Morgan/U-Street neighborhoods in DC.vanwinkle wrote:[hell, NYC is the only place I've ever encountered Ethiopian food, and it's awesome.
I'd consider living in DC, though it's a swamp and in the summer you have to deal with the mosquitoes and humidity.
-
- Posts: 18203
- Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:47 pm
Re: Berkeley Haters
I'm within walking distance of an ethopian, polish, tons of different types of Asian, and German and I'm in the far northside of chicago. I don't know about Bulgarian.vanwinkle wrote:You must just know people that suck.ughOSU wrote:bolded is very credited. And for the record, people in Chicago don't give two shits about new york. Personally, I'm from neither city, but love both. People from NYC seem to have this mean streak about them trying to yell about how much better their city is than everywhere (even converted west coasters), and they all fail to realize that nobody cares but them. I think if anything, the lack of that prevailing arrogant attitude makes chicago>nyc in my book.rayiner wrote:Read the link. NY is by far the state with the most extreme outflux of residents.
As for New York versus Chicago:
New York has more of the stuff common people don't care about: art, culture, etc.
Chicago has less of the stuff that common people dislike: intellectuals, artists, foreigners, etc, and more of the stuff they do: sausage, deep dish pizza, etc.
Also, wtf is this about "common people"? And disliking "foreigners"? WTF? I guess by "common people" you mean "middle-class white Republicans"... NYC has awesome things to do for people of just about any background or income level. Also, NYC has the most awesome food in the world. There are restaurants offering every kind of food in the world, there's 16 different kinds of Asian food, Polish, German, and Bulgarian restaurants... hell, NYC is the only place I've ever encountered Ethiopian food, and it's awesome.
NYC is also the only place I've ever seen a macaroni-and-cheese restaurant. They have everything there.
This is what you make me think about when you talk about "common people":
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HKbt3wRsZYw
Chicago has a great variety of food.
- crackberry
- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: Berkeley Haters
Any big city is going to have all the food you could ever want.
The only notable variations are: better Mexican in SoCal, better Chinese in SF and New York and better sushi in coastal cities.
NYC definitely has the highest proportion of high end restaurants though. LA is second. Chicago is probably a distant third.
The only notable variations are: better Mexican in SoCal, better Chinese in SF and New York and better sushi in coastal cities.
NYC definitely has the highest proportion of high end restaurants though. LA is second. Chicago is probably a distant third.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- vanwinkle
- Posts: 8953
- Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 3:02 am
Re: Berkeley Haters
Oh, NYC even has authentic Texas BBQ. (This shocked me when I encountered it.
) I challenge you to find that in Chicago.

- crackberry
- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: Berkeley Haters
I assume you are not referring to Dallas BBQ?vanwinkle wrote:Oh, NYC even has authentic Texas BBQ. (This shocked me when I encountered it.) I challenge you to find that in Chicago.
- vanwinkle
- Posts: 8953
- Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 3:02 am
Re: Berkeley Haters
Oh HELL no.crackberry wrote:I assume you are not referring to Dallas BBQ?vanwinkle wrote:Oh, NYC even has authentic Texas BBQ. (This shocked me when I encountered it.) I challenge you to find that in Chicago.
-
- Posts: 443
- Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 9:42 pm
Re: Berkeley Haters
Now that is entirely possible...vanwinkle wrote:You must just know people that suck.ughOSU wrote:bolded is very credited. And for the record, people in Chicago don't give two shits about new york. Personally, I'm from neither city, but love both. People from NYC seem to have this mean streak about them trying to yell about how much better their city is than everywhere (even converted west coasters), and they all fail to realize that nobody cares but them. I think if anything, the lack of that prevailing arrogant attitude makes chicago>nyc in my book.rayiner wrote:Read the link. NY is by far the state with the most extreme outflux of residents.
As for New York versus Chicago:
New York has more of the stuff common people don't care about: art, culture, etc.
Chicago has less of the stuff that common people dislike: intellectuals, artists, foreigners, etc, and more of the stuff they do: sausage, deep dish pizza, etc.
crackberry wrote:NYC >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Chicago.
crackberry wrote:And Chicago is full of corrupt politicians and people with biting inferiority complexes over the Second City's place in the world vis-a-vis New York.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- crackberry
- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: Berkeley Haters
I am basing many of my generalizations about Chicago off three friends who live there who won't shut up about how awesome Chicago is and how it is so much better than New York. Never mind that two of them have never been to New York. All they can talk about is having a lake and beaches (I don't consider sand next to a lake a beach. It's only a beach if the water nearby has salt in it) and deep dish pizza. It infuriates me.
In the words of the late John Updike: “The true New Yorker secretly believes that people living anywhere else have to be, in some sense, kidding.”
In the words of the late John Updike: “The true New Yorker secretly believes that people living anywhere else have to be, in some sense, kidding.”
- rayiner
- Posts: 6145
- Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 11:43 am
Re: Berkeley Haters
Most people don't really like diversity, either cultural, political, or socioeconomic. Hence: suburbs.vanwinkle wrote:Also, wtf is this about "common people"? And disliking "foreigners"? WTF? I guess by "common people" you mean "middle-class white Republicans"... NYC has awesome things to do for people of just about any background or income level.
- Dignan
- Posts: 1110
- Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2009 5:52 pm
Re: Berkeley Haters
Yep. There's also a fair amount of good Ethiopian food in Berkeley and Oakland.crackberry wrote:Lots of Ethiopian food in the Adams Morgan/U-Street neighborhoods in DC.vanwinkle wrote:[hell, NYC is the only place I've ever encountered Ethiopian food, and it's awesome.
-
- Posts: 6244
- Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 6:09 pm
Re: Berkeley Haters
lots of Ethiopians in DC/VA/MD area surprisingly enoughcrackberry wrote:Lots of Ethiopian food in the Adams Morgan/U-Street neighborhoods in DC.vanwinkle wrote:[hell, NYC is the only place I've ever encountered Ethiopian food, and it's awesome.
DELICIOUS FOOD too
New York has more of the stuff common people don't care about: art, culture, etc.
Chicago has less of the stuff that common people dislike: intellectuals, artists, foreigners, etc, and more of the stuff they do: sausage, deep dish pizza, etc.
don't forget lawyers
Last edited by Borhas on Sun Jan 28, 2018 2:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 248
- Joined: Sat Oct 17, 2009 4:18 pm
Re: Berkeley Haters
most people i know say that socal has the best taiwanese food in calicrackberry wrote:Any big city is going to have all the food you could ever want.
The only notable variations are: better Mexican in SoCal, better Chinese in SF and New York and better sushi in coastal cities.
NYC definitely has the highest proportion of high end restaurants though. LA is second. Chicago is probably a distant third.
by socal, i pretty much mean the LA suburbs with 23423423 chinese people (e.g. rowland heights, hacienda heights, san gabriel, etc.)
Last edited by Tofu on Tue Jan 26, 2010 11:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Tangerine Gleam
- Posts: 1280
- Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 4:50 pm
Re: Berkeley Haters
I'll settle this:
SF, NYC, and Chicago are perhaps the three greatest cities in America. Different strokes for different folks.
Personally, having also lived in NY for 4+ years, I think SF is better...for me, that is. I never entirely got used to being in NYC. It's just not my speed. Chicago is a solid #2, but it's just so damn cold.
Also see: Austin, Seattle, Portland.
And, for the record, fuck L.A.
SF, NYC, and Chicago are perhaps the three greatest cities in America. Different strokes for different folks.
Personally, having also lived in NY for 4+ years, I think SF is better...for me, that is. I never entirely got used to being in NYC. It's just not my speed. Chicago is a solid #2, but it's just so damn cold.
Also see: Austin, Seattle, Portland.
And, for the record, fuck L.A.
- Tangerine Gleam
- Posts: 1280
- Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 4:50 pm
Re: Berkeley Haters
Credited. And SF may not have as many high-end restaurants as NY or LA, but -- like Chicago -- is venerated as a top global culinary city. I'd even argue that it might be moreso than Chicago, especially because of the influence of all of the Napa/Sonoma vineyards and NorCal foodies as well as the huge sustainable/local food culture.crackberry wrote:Any big city is going to have all the food you could ever want.
The only notable variations are: better Mexican in SoCal, better Chinese in SF and New York and better sushi in coastal cities.
NYC definitely has the highest proportion of high end restaurants though. LA is second. Chicago is probably a distant third.
- crackberry
- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: Berkeley Haters
True, all the hippies (I use this term affectionately here ... in the organic, sustainable, Whole Foods kind of way) in the Bay Area contribute to a high concentration of very good food.Tangerine Gleam wrote:Credited. And SF may not have as many high-end restaurants as NY or LA, but -- like Chicago -- is venerated as a top global culinary city. I'd even argue that it might be moreso than Chicago, especially because of the influence of all of the Napa/Sonoma vineyards and NorCal foodies as well as the huge sustainable/local food culture.crackberry wrote:Any big city is going to have all the food you could ever want.
The only notable variations are: better Mexican in SoCal, better Chinese in SF and New York and better sushi in coastal cities.
NYC definitely has the highest proportion of high end restaurants though. LA is second. Chicago is probably a distant third.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login