Retaking is always TCR. Even if you have a 180.SBL wrote:Should I retake? I hear their median went up to 175 and they no longer consider applications from anyone who has never invented an internet.Bronck wrote:My suggestion: drop out. like NOW. Then reapply to ASU.SBL wrote:My law school dropped 6 spots!!!!!!!! I'm doomed!!!!!!!
Is it too late to file a transfer app to ASU as a second-semester 3L?
2013 Rankings Forum
- Bronck

- Posts: 2025
- Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2012 1:28 pm
Re: 2013 Rankings
- Jaeger

- Posts: 386
- Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 5:30 pm
Re: 2013 Rankings
Two times is twice as nice. It effectively doubles your chances.Bronck wrote:Retaking is always TCR. Even if you have a 180.SBL wrote:Should I retake? I hear their median went up to 175 and they no longer consider applications from anyone who has never invented an internet.Bronck wrote:My suggestion: drop out. like NOW. Then reapply to ASU.SBL wrote:My law school dropped 6 spots!!!!!!!! I'm doomed!!!!!!!
Is it too late to file a transfer app to ASU as a second-semester 3L?
Last edited by Jaeger on Wed Mar 14, 2012 1:22 am, edited 1 time in total.
- R86

- Posts: 460
- Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2012 8:03 pm
- Bronck

- Posts: 2025
- Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2012 1:28 pm
Re: 2013 Rankings
Indeed. It shows the school that you're really, really smart. They will be throwing models and bottles in your direction.Jaeger wrote: Two times is twice as nice.
- Jaeger

- Posts: 386
- Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 5:30 pm
Re: 2013 Rankings
It's what separates the full tuition kids from the full tuition + stipend kids.Bronck wrote:Indeed. It shows the school that you're really, really smart. They will be throwing models and bottles in your direction.Jaeger wrote: Two times is twice as nice.
-
Revolver066

- Posts: 260
- Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2010 7:54 pm
Re: 2013 Rankings
Gaddammit, came in here expecting meaningless yet entertaining rankings banter. Instead I get the TLS regulars jerking themselves off and making the same unfunny jokes for pages. I am disappoint.
-
de5igual

- Posts: 1442
- Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 11:52 pm
Re: 2013 Rankings
love it.romothesavior wrote:ENJOYDLAPIPERYOUBIGREDFOOLS
- Jaeger

- Posts: 386
- Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 5:30 pm
Re: 2013 Rankings
Revolver066 wrote:Gaddammit, came in here expecting meaningless yet entertaining rankings banter. Instead I get the TLS regulars jerking themselves off and making the same unfunny jokes for pages. I am disappoint.
You obviously had silly expectations.
-
rad lulz

- Posts: 9807
- Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 10:53 pm
- Bronck

- Posts: 2025
- Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2012 1:28 pm
Re: 2013 Rankings
Somebody is just jealous that they didn't get in on the fun.rad lulz wrote:With 943 poasts I wouldn't be taking too many hard jabs at us "regulars."Revolver066 wrote:Gaddammit, came in here expecting meaningless yet entertaining rankings banter. Instead I get the TLS regulars jerking themselves off and making the same unfunny jokes for pages. I am disappoint.
- Jaeger

- Posts: 386
- Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 5:30 pm
Re: 2013 Rankings
That's DROVES OF POASTS! DROVES I TELL YOU!rad lulz wrote:With 943 poasts I wouldn't be taking too many hard jabs at us "regulars."Revolver066 wrote:Gaddammit, came in here expecting meaningless yet entertaining rankings banter. Instead I get the TLS regulars jerking themselves off and making the same unfunny jokes for pages. I am disappoint.
Nope, doesn't work for me. You do it.
-
Revolver066

- Posts: 260
- Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2010 7:54 pm
Re: 2013 Rankings
Ah, but the "TLS regulars" line wasn't really the jab. I respect the work of many fine TLS regulars, it's just I usually expect them to be funnier (well, maybe not you)rad lulz wrote:With 943 poasts I wouldn't be taking too many hard jabs at us "regulars."Revolver066 wrote:Gaddammit, came in here expecting meaningless yet entertaining rankings banter. Instead I get the TLS regulars jerking themselves off and making the same unfunny jokes for pages. I am disappoint.
- Jaeger

- Posts: 386
- Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 5:30 pm
Re: 2013 Rankings
So instead of them jerking themselves off, you wanted to do it for them?Revolver066 wrote:Ah, but the "TLS regulars" line wasn't really the jab. I respect the work of many fine TLS regulars, it's just I usually expect them to be funnier (well, maybe not you)rad lulz wrote:With 943 poasts I wouldn't be taking too many hard jabs at us "regulars."Revolver066 wrote:Gaddammit, came in here expecting meaningless yet entertaining rankings banter. Instead I get the TLS regulars jerking themselves off and making the same unfunny jokes for pages. I am disappoint.
I kid, I kid, you're great.
-
Revolver066

- Posts: 260
- Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2010 7:54 pm
Re: 2013 Rankings
- Bronck

- Posts: 2025
- Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2012 1:28 pm
Re: 2013 Rankings
LOLJaeger wrote:Double entendre.
- stratocophic

- Posts: 2204
- Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 6:24 pm
Re: 2013 Rankings
DAMN YOU *sobs*rad lulz wrote:I predict employers flee WUSTL in DROVES in favor of ASUromothesavior wrote:I just wish I could have transferred before being stained with a non-T20 degree.beachbum wrote:But if we don't spend 50 pages discussing otherwise meaningless rankings, how are we going to determine which is better between Drake and Gonzaga? The world needs to know!romothesavior wrote:The USNWR rankings and this thread represent what I hate most about law schools and law students.
Lol hold up, carry on breh forgot I already did OCI. Let them eat gooey butter cake
- Bronck

- Posts: 2025
- Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2012 1:28 pm
Re: 2013 Rankings
Firms are gonna no offer/latham WUSTLers in DROVES bro.stratocophic wrote:
Lol hold up, carry on breh forgot I already did OCI. Let them eat gooey butter cake
- omninode

- Posts: 405
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2010 2:09 pm
Re: 2013 Rankings
The word "droves" starts to sound weird if you say it a lot. Fortunately, I don't say it a lot.
- chup

- Posts: 22942
- Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2007 10:48 pm
Re: 2013 Rankings
Underappreciated.stratocophic wrote:Let them eat gooey butter cake
- Big Shrimpin

- Posts: 2470
- Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 12:35 pm
Re: 2013 Rankings
You're doing it wrong, breh.omninode wrote:The word "droves" starts to sound weird if you say it a lot. Fortunately, I don't say it a lot.
-
josh43299

- Posts: 207
- Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2011 8:29 pm
Re: 2013 Rankings
I think any word starts to sounds weird if you say it a lot...Big Shrimpin wrote:You're doing it wrong, breh.omninode wrote:The word "droves" starts to sound weird if you say it a lot. Fortunately, I don't say it a lot.
EDIT: I think that my comment was the death rattle of this thread.
-
tennisking88

- Posts: 655
- Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2011 1:15 am
Re: 2013 Rankings
Just because they don't get paid as much as Ivy professors does not mean they are not grossly overpaid.Richie Tenenbaum wrote:You do realize that these salaries are low compared to peer private law schools right? They're low compared to even other public schools (compare with michigan: http://data.michigandaily.com/tmdsal?de ... me=&lname= ).tennisking88 wrote:Easy, guys, it was a joke http://abovethelaw.com/2011/05/your-tui ... d-at-work/chimp wrote:Holding it back from what?tennisking88 wrote:
The only thing holding UT back is its underpaid faculty
Not that I'm saying I think the current situation is a good one, but it's annoying to see UT bashed for high prof salaries when they don't even compare to what law profs at ivies are getting paid.
- 20130312

- Posts: 3814
- Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2011 8:53 pm
Re: 2013 Rankings
Wow, this thread finally made it to page 2.
- romothesavior

- Posts: 14692
- Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 4:29 pm
Re: 2013 Rankings
Mmm.... do want.aschup wrote:Underappreciated.stratocophic wrote:Let them eat gooey butter cake