This is my favorite line from this thread.patogordo wrote:patogordo wrote:i would suggest using $50k on therapy to learn to cope with the lack of a yale degree and then pocket the difference.

This is my favorite line from this thread.patogordo wrote:patogordo wrote:i would suggest using $50k on therapy to learn to cope with the lack of a yale degree and then pocket the difference.
Amen. Can't tell you how many times I hear students who went to Harvard, Stanford, Columbia, etc. say that they wish they had taken the full scholarship at a slightly lower ranked school. We aren't talking T3 to T20 or something. The Harvard guy I know had a pretty much full scholarship at Columbia that he passed up, and the Stanford guy could have gone to Berkeley for close to free. Plus I know a guy who passed up a full scholarship to Cornell to go to Columbia at sticker. Despite their awesome job outcomes, all 3 have indicated that they wish they took the debt-free/low debt route.heartbreaker wrote:For what it's worth, I regret choosing YLS over the Hamilton at Columbia all the time. I acknowledge that I have done well in large part due to professor connections and other opportunities at YLS (I have two clerkships in very competitive courts). But I was very unhappy at YLS and I resent the albatross of debt.
Having been out of school for a few years, I now think that a lot of the YLS advantage is self-perpetuating. People at YLS are extremely ambitious, talented and successful. They would still be ambitious, talented and successful somewhere else. The Hamilton scholars I know have all done very well and are clerking on the same courts I am and practicing in the same fields that I am interested in. I have no way of knowing if I would have done as well professionally at Columbia as I did at Yale, but I am fairly certain that I would have been much happier.
If you have these choices, you will do well wherever you go. Try to make a decision based on more than theoretical advantages for unicorn job opportunities. Learn more about the culture of the schools, the curriculum, what it is really like to be a student there. YLS is a great law school, but it is not right for everyone.
patogordo wrote:you'll never regret either decision because cognitive dissonance. subjective "regret" is a pretty terrible metric for decisionmaking.
Want to continue reading?
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
I'd recommend the Ruby as well, but I wouldn't make any decisions based on concerns that Yale will leave PI people out in the cold if PSLF gets reduced or eliminated.jimbeam21 wrote: Sure, you can rely on LIPP/LRAP/COAP or whatever. The downfall of relying on this has been highlighted in other threads on here. Take the Ruby, a less prestigious post-grad position, and live debt free.
$130k in debt from Yale is pretty good. You can also look at average debt at graduation for those that took out a loan and for last year, Yale was at $112k. That will increase, but its still manageable.jimbeam21 wrote:I don't understand why anyone who wants to go into PI would be willing to take on debt.
From the Yale website: "In 2014-2015, students will be expected, depending on the class year, to meet the first $41,100, $42,100 or $43,100 of their need with loans."
That means even if the rest of your COA is covered by a need-based grant, you're still looking at around $130k in loans!!!
Sure, you can rely on LIPP/LRAP/COAP or whatever. The downfall of relying on this has been highlighted in other threads on here. Take the Ruby, a less prestigious post-grad position, and live debt free.
I'm in a similar position here, minus Yale but plus Stanford, so feel free to PM me.
I actually revisited this thread because I just received my financial aid package from Yale (details are quoted above). Do these numbers influence anyone's thoughts?aboutmydaylight wrote:$130k in debt from Yale is pretty good. You can also look at average debt at graduation for those that took out a loan and for last year, Yale was at $112k. That will increase, but its still manageable.jimbeam21 wrote:I don't understand why anyone who wants to go into PI would be willing to take on debt.
From the Yale website: "In 2014-2015, students will be expected, depending on the class year, to meet the first $41,100, $42,100 or $43,100 of their need with loans."
That means even if the rest of your COA is covered by a need-based grant, you're still looking at around $130k in loans!!!
Sure, you can rely on LIPP/LRAP/COAP or whatever. The downfall of relying on this has been highlighted in other threads on here. Take the Ruby, a less prestigious post-grad position, and live debt free.
I'm in a similar position here, minus Yale but plus Stanford, so feel free to PM me.
http://grad-schools.usnews.rankingsandr ... ngs/page+4
I mean half tuition schollys now a days might cover 80kover 3 years? That effectively puts you at 140k-160k of debt at graduation depending on school if you have no other source of contribution. I think if you can get out of HYS with debt in the low 100s, you can justify the decision. That may be the "average" debt at graduation, but who knows how feasible, or what the median is. Of course, you're choice is only as good as your next best option, and with a Ruby on the table...dobryden wrote:I wanted to return to this topic with some numbers, having received my financial aid from Yale. They are giving me about $13,000 a year, but also expecting my parents to contribute $16,000 per year (which is a hardship on them). I'll take on about $54,000 in debt per year - and perhaps more if my family is unable/unwilling to contribute.
Chicago is debt-free, allowing me to graduate with about $20,000 in savings.
With these figures, does this change anyone's opinion?
And I know literally zero of my classmates with this opinion, though there probably are some. Anecdata ftwkaiser wrote:Amen. Can't tell you how many times I hear students who went to Harvard, Stanford, Columbia, etc. say that they wish they had taken the full scholarship at a slightly lower ranked school. We aren't talking T3 to T20 or something. The Harvard guy I know had a pretty much full scholarship at Columbia that he passed up, and the Stanford guy could have gone to Berkeley for close to free. Plus I know a guy who passed up a full scholarship to Cornell to go to Columbia at sticker. Despite their awesome job outcomes, all 3 have indicated that they wish they took the debt-free/low debt route.heartbreaker wrote:For what it's worth, I regret choosing YLS over the Hamilton at Columbia all the time. I acknowledge that I have done well in large part due to professor connections and other opportunities at YLS (I have two clerkships in very competitive courts). But I was very unhappy at YLS and I resent the albatross of debt.
Having been out of school for a few years, I now think that a lot of the YLS advantage is self-perpetuating. People at YLS are extremely ambitious, talented and successful. They would still be ambitious, talented and successful somewhere else. The Hamilton scholars I know have all done very well and are clerking on the same courts I am and practicing in the same fields that I am interested in. I have no way of knowing if I would have done as well professionally at Columbia as I did at Yale, but I am fairly certain that I would have been much happier.
If you have these choices, you will do well wherever you go. Try to make a decision based on more than theoretical advantages for unicorn job opportunities. Learn more about the culture of the schools, the curriculum, what it is really like to be a student there. YLS is a great law school, but it is not right for everyone.
dobryden wrote:I actually revisited this thread because I just received my financial aid package from Yale (details are quoted above). Do these numbers influence anyone's thoughts?aboutmydaylight wrote:$130k in debt from Yale is pretty good. You can also look at average debt at graduation for those that took out a loan and for last year, Yale was at $112k. That will increase, but its still manageable.jimbeam21 wrote:I don't understand why anyone who wants to go into PI would be willing to take on debt.
From the Yale website: "In 2014-2015, students will be expected, depending on the class year, to meet the first $41,100, $42,100 or $43,100 of their need with loans."
That means even if the rest of your COA is covered by a need-based grant, you're still looking at around $130k in loans!!!
Sure, you can rely on LIPP/LRAP/COAP or whatever. The downfall of relying on this has been highlighted in other threads on here. Take the Ruby, a less prestigious post-grad position, and live debt free.
I'm in a similar position here, minus Yale but plus Stanford, so feel free to PM me.
http://grad-schools.usnews.rankingsandr ... ngs/page+4
I mean half tuition schollys now a days might cover 80kover 3 years? That effectively puts you at 140k-160k of debt at graduation depending on school if you have no other source of contribution. I think if you can get out of HYS with debt in the low 100s, you can justify the decision. That may be the "average" debt at graduation, but who knows how feasible, or what the median is. Of course, you're choice is only as good as your next best option, and with a Ruby on the table...dobryden wrote:I wanted to return to this topic with some numbers, having received my financial aid from Yale. They are giving me about $13,000 a year, but also expecting my parents to contribute $16,000 per year (which is a hardship on them). I'll take on about $54,000 in debt per year - and perhaps more if my family is unable/unwilling to contribute.
Chicago is debt-free, allowing me to graduate with about $20,000 in savings.
With these figures, does this change anyone's opinion?
Register now!
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
1Ls have yet to taste their first debt payment. Still, the poster only said Harvard, Columbia, and Stanford students expressed regret. Maybe Yale truly is special. (Except for the Yale poster on the previous page and the many similarly situated others).Cicero76 wrote:And I know literally zero of my classmates with this opinion, though there probably are some. Anecdata ftwkaiser wrote:Amen. Can't tell you how many times I hear students who went to Harvard, Stanford, Columbia, etc. say that they wish they had taken the full scholarship at a slightly lower ranked school. We aren't talking T3 to T20 or something. The Harvard guy I know had a pretty much full scholarship at Columbia that he passed up, and the Stanford guy could have gone to Berkeley for close to free. Plus I know a guy who passed up a full scholarship to Cornell to go to Columbia at sticker. Despite their awesome job outcomes, all 3 have indicated that they wish they took the debt-free/low debt route.heartbreaker wrote:For what it's worth, I regret choosing YLS over the Hamilton at Columbia all the time. I acknowledge that I have done well in large part due to professor connections and other opportunities at YLS (I have two clerkships in very competitive courts). But I was very unhappy at YLS and I resent the albatross of debt.
Having been out of school for a few years, I now think that a lot of the YLS advantage is self-perpetuating. People at YLS are extremely ambitious, talented and successful. They would still be ambitious, talented and successful somewhere else. The Hamilton scholars I know have all done very well and are clerking on the same courts I am and practicing in the same fields that I am interested in. I have no way of knowing if I would have done as well professionally at Columbia as I did at Yale, but I am fairly certain that I would have been much happier.
If you have these choices, you will do well wherever you go. Try to make a decision based on more than theoretical advantages for unicorn job opportunities. Learn more about the culture of the schools, the curriculum, what it is really like to be a student there. YLS is a great law school, but it is not right for everyone.
And theres the key difference. I'm talking about colleagues, you are talking about classmates. The former are presently making large monthy debt payments, realizing they would have almost certainly gotten the same biglaw jobs had they just taken the scholarship. Of course, the people I mentioned didn't go to Yale, so perhaps that one school really is the exception to this sentimentCicero76 wrote:And I know literally zero of my classmates with this opinion, though there probably are some. Anecdata ftwkaiser wrote:Amen. Can't tell you how many times I hear students who went to Harvard, Stanford, Columbia, etc. say that they wish they had taken the full scholarship at a slightly lower ranked school. We aren't talking T3 to T20 or something. The Harvard guy I know had a pretty much full scholarship at Columbia that he passed up, and the Stanford guy could have gone to Berkeley for close to free. Plus I know a guy who passed up a full scholarship to Cornell to go to Columbia at sticker. Despite their awesome job outcomes, all 3 have indicated that they wish they took the debt-free/low debt route.heartbreaker wrote:For what it's worth, I regret choosing YLS over the Hamilton at Columbia all the time. I acknowledge that I have done well in large part due to professor connections and other opportunities at YLS (I have two clerkships in very competitive courts). But I was very unhappy at YLS and I resent the albatross of debt.
Having been out of school for a few years, I now think that a lot of the YLS advantage is self-perpetuating. People at YLS are extremely ambitious, talented and successful. They would still be ambitious, talented and successful somewhere else. The Hamilton scholars I know have all done very well and are clerking on the same courts I am and practicing in the same fields that I am interested in. I have no way of knowing if I would have done as well professionally at Columbia as I did at Yale, but I am fairly certain that I would have been much happier.
If you have these choices, you will do well wherever you go. Try to make a decision based on more than theoretical advantages for unicorn job opportunities. Learn more about the culture of the schools, the curriculum, what it is really like to be a student there. YLS is a great law school, but it is not right for everyone.
Fair enough. I think there's a lurking variable though: law school in general just sucks. Even a full tuition scholly is gunna mean north of 50k debt, so it's all kind of a red herring.kaiser wrote:
And theres the key difference. I'm talking about colleagues, you are talking about classmates. The former are presently making large monthy debt payments, realizing they would have almost certainly gotten the same biglaw jobs had they just taken the scholarship. Of course, the people I mentioned didn't go to Yale, so perhaps that one school really is the exception to this sentiment
Edit: Just realized the post above mine said pretty much exactly the same thing
no you won't. and for your sake i hope you enjoy biglaw or whatever. do you even realize how much you have to pay back to get back to zero net worth?jselson wrote:I've done the math (yes, at sticker, no, my parents aren't helping), and I think I'll be fine.Nelson wrote:So much this.Emma. wrote:Lol. Wait until you graduate and start making loan payments.jselson wrote:I'm a 1L, chose HLS over Chi at 90k, with similar goals to OP, and haven't worried much about debt or the job market since, and know almost no one here who really has. I'm very happy with the decision. If I had been in the OP's position, I would've gone to Yale.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
are you a 2l? if so, expect the earnings from your 2L SA to count negatively against your grant. you will lose at least ~10 grand for that third year, if you are getting the maximum grant. this is one aspect that is often neglected.AllTheLawz wrote:As a counter this, my choice was HYS vs full-scholarship (plus stipend in a number of cases) at most of the non-HYS top 10. While I don't necessarily regret choosing H (I have the a very good job offer in my field) I do wonder if it was worth it in incremental terms as I make my budget for after graduation. I have the maximum aid you can get at HLS while doing a 2L SA and that still results in 5 years of ~$2500/month loan payments, 5 years of delaying a home or having children and 5 years without the freedom that should be associated with my income level.
Not necessarily. Ruby is 15k a year stipend. Assuming 25k a year COA (outside of tuition):Cicero76 wrote:Fair enough. I think there's a lurking variable though: law school in general just sucks. Even a full tuition scholly is gunna mean north of 50k debt, so it's all kind of a red herring.kaiser wrote:
And theres the key difference. I'm talking about colleagues, you are talking about classmates. The former are presently making large monthy debt payments, realizing they would have almost certainly gotten the same biglaw jobs had they just taken the scholarship. Of course, the people I mentioned didn't go to Yale, so perhaps that one school really is the exception to this sentiment
Edit: Just realized the post above mine said pretty much exactly the same thing
I certainly hope biglaw isn't his goal if he took HLS over CLS at 90K. That is literally 90K completely wasted if biglaw is the goal.Blessedassurance wrote: no you won't. and for your sake i hope you enjoy biglaw or whatever. do you even realize how much you have to pay back to get back to zero net worth?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Already a member? Login
... Really? I find it pretty easy to say no to sticker.TigerDude wrote:These decisions are a lot easier to make in theory. Harder when presented with actual Stanford, Harvard, and (wow, unicorns exist!) Yale acceptances.
Best post ever. Like lipstick on a pig.Fair enough. I think there's a lurking variable though: law school in general just sucks.
I agree with this entirely. Shouldn't just choose HYS at sticker because you were starstruck by the name, and pushed rationality aside as a result. There are very few reasons or circumstances that would genuinely make HYS at sticker a better choice than CCN with a ton of money, and I think the above encompasses most of them.cotiger wrote:Types of people I think it makes sense to take YHS for:
-Parents/family helping you out in a big way.
-Super softs, low-ish numbers person who gets YHS acceptance but limited money elsewhere (so not applicable to Ruby people)
-If you have a specific unicorn-y job in mind and have experience that will actually give you a decent chance at getting that job
-Coming from a very low income family and so get big grants (though I'd still probably say go to T14 full-ride if that option is available)
That's really it.
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login