Class of 2012 Employment Data Forum

(Rankings, Profiles, Tuition, Student Life, . . . )
Post Reply
User avatar
Bronck

Gold
Posts: 2025
Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2012 1:28 pm

Re: Class of 2012 Employment Data

Post by Bronck » Mon Mar 25, 2013 5:59 pm

CLS and UChi are being really slow and I'm very curious to see their numbers...!

User avatar
iMisto

Silver
Posts: 658
Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2011 3:55 pm

Re: Class of 2012 Employment Data

Post by iMisto » Mon Mar 25, 2013 9:57 pm

Very happy to see these numbers from Cornell. :)

User avatar
twinkletoes16

Silver
Posts: 1317
Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2012 11:14 pm

Re: Class of 2012 Employment Data

Post by twinkletoes16 » Mon Mar 25, 2013 10:19 pm

Come on, berk. Release those numbers. Let them be good.

chipchip

New
Posts: 94
Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2009 5:56 pm

Re: Class of 2012 Employment Data

Post by chipchip » Tue Mar 26, 2013 12:28 am

Just saying, to call working at a small firm or business or academic or a non-fed clerkship, to be "under/unemployed" is a bit presumptuous. Some people may have wanted to go into that route (I know at least 4 or 5 from GULC), some people (such as internationals) are not eligible for AIII clerkships but are eligible for state ones (I know of at least 1 from Mich.), and some people wanted to be in academia and got their chance. 100+ firms/AIII clerkships are not the holy grail for everyone.

My .02 cents.

User avatar
Bronck

Gold
Posts: 2025
Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2012 1:28 pm

Re: Class of 2012 Employment Data

Post by Bronck » Tue Mar 26, 2013 12:30 am

chipchip wrote:Just saying, to call working at a small firm or business or academic or a non-fed clerkship, to be "under/unemployed" is a bit presumptuous. Some people may have wanted to go into that route (I know at least 4 or 5 from GULC), some people (such as internationals) are not eligible for AIII clerkships but are eligible for state ones (I know of at least 1 from Mich.), and some people wanted to be in academia and got their chance. 100+ firms/AIII clerkships are not the holy grail for everyone.

My .02 cents.
We know. It's already been discussed here (and elsewhere). The graphs intentionally paint a conservative picture of employment because of the difficulty of judging the other categories.
Last edited by Bronck on Tue Mar 26, 2013 12:31 am, edited 1 time in total.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


User avatar
longlivetheking

Bronze
Posts: 279
Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2012 2:15 am

Re: Class of 2012 Employment Data

Post by longlivetheking » Tue Mar 26, 2013 12:30 am

but for the interest of compiling a credible source of information for desirable outcomes we have to basically assume those outcomes are shit.

User avatar
lever1je

New
Posts: 31
Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2012 2:35 pm

Re: Class of 2012 Employment Data

Post by lever1je » Tue Mar 26, 2013 1:37 am

Cooley's data is out. I noticed that there wasn't a spot left on the graph for it so it's gonna have to be edited (don't know how you forgot the #2 school in the country)

http://www.cooley.edu/consumerinformati ... y-2012.pdf

User avatar
Bronck

Gold
Posts: 2025
Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2012 1:28 pm

Re: Class of 2012 Employment Data

Post by Bronck » Tue Mar 26, 2013 1:40 am

lever1je wrote:Cooley's data is out. I noticed that there wasn't a spot left on the graph for it so it's gonna have to be edited (don't know how you forgot the #2 school in the country)

http://www.cooley.edu/consumerinformati ... y-2012.pdf
Not bad. 1.4% into desirable outcomes and 79.4% un/underemployed.

User avatar
togepi

Silver
Posts: 533
Joined: Thu May 10, 2012 10:13 am

Re: Class of 2012 Employment Data

Post by togepi » Tue Mar 26, 2013 1:42 am

Bronck wrote:
lever1je wrote:Cooley's data is out. I noticed that there wasn't a spot left on the graph for it so it's gonna have to be edited (don't know how you forgot the #2 school in the country)

http://www.cooley.edu/consumerinformati ... y-2012.pdf
Not bad. 1.4% into desirable outcomes and 79.4% un/underemployed.
That one guy at the 500+ firm, lol. The .01%

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


User avatar
ph5354a

Gold
Posts: 1600
Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 7:40 pm

Re: Class of 2012 Employment Data

Post by ph5354a » Tue Mar 26, 2013 7:29 am

Thanks for this data guys. Anyone with knowledge of Cornell think that the 57.9% is sustainable? Any reasons why they can't top 50% every year? They're usually closer to 40% right?

User avatar
RetakeFrenzy

Silver
Posts: 597
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2012 11:41 am

Re: Class of 2012 Employment Data

Post by RetakeFrenzy » Tue Mar 26, 2013 7:39 am

togepi wrote:
Bronck wrote:
lever1je wrote:Cooley's data is out. I noticed that there wasn't a spot left on the graph for it so it's gonna have to be edited (don't know how you forgot the #2 school in the country)

http://www.cooley.edu/consumerinformati ... y-2012.pdf
Not bad. 1.4% into desirable outcomes and 79.4% un/underemployed.
That one guy at the 500+ firm, lol. The .01%
:shock:

User avatar
Aberzombie1892

Gold
Posts: 1908
Joined: Sun Mar 29, 2009 10:56 am

Re: Class of 2012 Employment Data

Post by Aberzombie1892 » Tue Mar 26, 2013 7:43 am

ph5354a wrote:Thanks for this data guys. Anyone with knowledge of Cornell think that the 57.9% is sustainable? Any reasons why they can't top 50% every year? They're usually closer to 40% right?
Remember that firms of 100+ attorneys are not the same thing as NLJ firm placement. I think that you may be confusing the two.

User avatar
ph5354a

Gold
Posts: 1600
Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 7:40 pm

Re: Class of 2012 Employment Data

Post by ph5354a » Tue Mar 26, 2013 7:50 am

Aberzombie1892 wrote:
ph5354a wrote:Thanks for this data guys. Anyone with knowledge of Cornell think that the 57.9% is sustainable? Any reasons why they can't top 50% every year? They're usually closer to 40% right?
Remember that firms of 100+ attorneys are not the same thing as NLJ firm placement. I think that you may be confusing the two.
Yup, you're right :D This still seems to be a significant jump for Cornell. I hope they can sustain it.

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


andythefir

Silver
Posts: 701
Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2010 1:56 am

Re: Class of 2012 Employment Data

Post by andythefir » Tue Mar 26, 2013 8:07 am

The funniest part of Cooley's numbers are the school funded part time non-professional positions. Do they take on unemployed students as janitors?

User avatar
WhiteyCakes

Silver
Posts: 1390
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2012 2:38 pm

Re: Class of 2012 Employment Data

Post by WhiteyCakes » Tue Mar 26, 2013 8:37 am

Bronck wrote:CLS and UChi are being really slow and I'm very curious to see their numbers...!

User avatar
Rahviveh

Gold
Posts: 2333
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2012 12:02 pm

Re: Class of 2012 Employment Data

Post by Rahviveh » Tue Mar 26, 2013 9:14 am

ph5354a wrote:
Aberzombie1892 wrote:
ph5354a wrote:Thanks for this data guys. Anyone with knowledge of Cornell think that the 57.9% is sustainable? Any reasons why they can't top 50% every year? They're usually closer to 40% right?
Remember that firms of 100+ attorneys are not the same thing as NLJ firm placement. I think that you may be confusing the two.
Yup, you're right :D This still seems to be a significant jump for Cornell. I hope they can sustain it.
There's no reason to think they can't. Cornell was placing 70%+ before the crash. It won't ever get back to that point, but Cornell can place just as well as peer schools ITE.

And Cornell wasn't unique in being under 50% last year IIRC (firms + A3). C/o 2011 was rock bottom.

M458

Bronze
Posts: 456
Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2012 5:58 pm

Re: Class of 2012 Employment Data

Post by M458 » Tue Mar 26, 2013 11:05 am

ChampagnePapi wrote:
ph5354a wrote:
Aberzombie1892 wrote:
ph5354a wrote:Thanks for this data guys. Anyone with knowledge of Cornell think that the 57.9% is sustainable? Any reasons why they can't top 50% every year? They're usually closer to 40% right?
Remember that firms of 100+ attorneys are not the same thing as NLJ firm placement. I think that you may be confusing the two.
Yup, you're right :D This still seems to be a significant jump for Cornell. I hope they can sustain it.
There's no reason to think they can't. Cornell was placing 70%+ before the crash. It won't ever get back to that point, but Cornell can place just as well as peer schools ITE.

And Cornell wasn't unique in being under 50% last year IIRC (firms + A3). C/o 2011 was rock bottom.
It's also a small class size, so small bumps in placement in terms of numbers can affect their percentages significantly.

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


User avatar
Rahviveh

Gold
Posts: 2333
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2012 12:02 pm

Re: Class of 2012 Employment Data

Post by Rahviveh » Tue Mar 26, 2013 12:51 pm

BU Law:

100+ firms: 74/273
Fed Clerks: 13/273

Total: 31.9%

27/273 on school-funded positions

User avatar
Lavitz

Gold
Posts: 3402
Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 1:39 am

Re: Class of 2012 Employment Data

Post by Lavitz » Tue Mar 26, 2013 1:00 pm

iMisto wrote:Very happy to see these numbers from Cornell. :)
+1

User avatar
Rahviveh

Gold
Posts: 2333
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2012 12:02 pm

Re: Class of 2012 Employment Data

Post by Rahviveh » Tue Mar 26, 2013 1:02 pm

UC Hastings:

100+ Firms - 59/443
Fed Clerks - 9/443

Total: 15.3%

BTW They got a really detailed breakdown on their site, very interesting breaking down biz and PI jobs:

http://www.uchastings.edu/career-office ... 2Stats.pdf

7 people working in-house, 7 people in consulting, etc etc

User avatar
Rahviveh

Gold
Posts: 2333
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2012 12:02 pm

Re: Class of 2012 Employment Data

Post by Rahviveh » Tue Mar 26, 2013 1:08 pm

Also, just eyeballing it, it doesn't seem like the employment situation is improving much at most law schools. The top schools are seeing a rebound in biglaw hiring, but the BR/FT% outside the top schools is still very low. Hastings is at 50% :? I guess we will know for sure once LST updates.

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


SportsFan

Silver
Posts: 727
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2012 5:26 pm

Re: Class of 2012 Employment Data

Post by SportsFan » Tue Mar 26, 2013 1:11 pm

ChampagnePapi wrote:Also, just eyeballing it, it doesn't seem like the employment situation is improving much at most law schools. The top schools are seeing a rebound in biglaw hiring, but the BR/FT% outside the top schools is still very low. Hastings is at 50% :? I guess we will know for sure once LST updates.
Yeah, seems like biglaw did well but pretty much everything else is still struggling a bit.

User avatar
Rahviveh

Gold
Posts: 2333
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2012 12:02 pm

Re: Class of 2012 Employment Data

Post by Rahviveh » Tue Mar 26, 2013 1:48 pm

Wow I didn't realize W&L has only 130 students

100+: 14/130
Fed clerk: 6/130

total: 15.4%

colonelnerd

New
Posts: 30
Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2013 7:04 pm

Re: Class of 2012 Employment Data

Post by colonelnerd » Tue Mar 26, 2013 2:02 pm

Wow, big jump for BU: ~22% to ~32%

Dying to see BC's numbers; hope they have a proportionate jump.

Real Madrid

Silver
Posts: 835
Joined: Mon May 30, 2011 12:21 am

Re: Class of 2012 Employment Data

Post by Real Madrid » Tue Mar 26, 2013 2:04 pm

CLS, Chicago, Boalt and NU are taking a while. Wonder if that means anything other than them just being slow. :?

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “Choosing a Law School”