I guess this stems from your bitterness at having achieved only a 166.Informative wrote:^Troll fail.
BU vs. BC (The Annual Discussion) Forum
-
- Posts: 1505
- Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2010 6:56 pm
Re: BU vs. BC (The Annual Discussion)
-
- Posts: 97
- Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 11:10 pm
Re: BU vs. BC (The Annual Discussion)
While I wouldn't say they're immensely better, I do think UCLA/USC are a tad of a step up. While certainly not the best indicator, I got tons of money from BU/BC, but didn't get any from UCLA.
-
- Posts: 2890
- Joined: Wed Jul 28, 2010 6:42 pm
Re: BU vs. BC (The Annual Discussion)
I bet you're a joy in real life.FiveSermon wrote:I guess this stems from your bitterness at having achieved only a 166.Informative wrote:^Troll fail.
- Blindmelon
- Posts: 1708
- Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2009 11:13 am
Re: BU vs. BC (The Annual Discussion)
USC is overrated - should be lumped with BU/BC/GW etc. UCLA is a step up -kams wrote:While I wouldn't say they're immensely better, I do think UCLA/USC are a tad of a step up. While certainly not the best indicator, I got tons of money from BU/BC, but didn't get any from UCLA.
- Birdlaw
- Posts: 113
- Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2010 12:09 pm
Re: BU vs. BC (The Annual Discussion)
I thought this was BU versus BC, not BU vs. BC vs. UCLA vs. USC vs. (Insert any school ranked 15-30).Blindmelon wrote:USC is overrated - should be lumped with BU/BC/GW etc. UCLA is a step up -kams wrote:While I wouldn't say they're immensely better, I do think UCLA/USC are a tad of a step up. While certainly not the best indicator, I got tons of money from BU/BC, but didn't get any from UCLA.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login