Are we moving towards YH and SC? Is Stanford's future in danger?
Yale v. Stanford Forum
-
NightHooded

- Posts: 81
- Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2010 12:56 am
Re: Yale v. Stanford
Just noticed the USNWR rankings: 100, 97, 93, 91 for YHSC!
Are we moving towards YH and SC? Is Stanford's future in danger?
Are we moving towards YH and SC? Is Stanford's future in danger?
- crackberry

- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: Yale v. Stanford
Well, to be fair, it would be more like Y-H-S-C.NightHooded wrote:Just noticed the USNWR rankings: 100, 97, 93, 91 for YHSC!
Are we moving towards YH and SC? Is Stanford's future in danger?
- Dignan

- Posts: 1110
- Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2009 5:52 pm
Re: Yale v. Stanford
I like Columbia--I might even be going there next year--but I don't think it belongs in the same tier as Stanford. For most types of big law, SLS and CLS are basically peer schools. But for almost everything else--clerkships, academia, elite PI--Stanford is better. It's going to take more than a shift in a magazine's ranking system to change that.NightHooded wrote:Just noticed the USNWR rankings: 100, 97, 93, 91 for YHSC!
Are we moving towards YH and SC? Is Stanford's future in danger?
- crackberry

- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: Yale v. Stanford
Plus I think one could make the argument that Stanford owns the West Coast in a way that Columbia most certainly does not own the East Coast (or even NYC). Sure, CLS is better than SLS for NYC BigLaw, but is it better for anything else?Dignan wrote:I like Columbia--I might even be going there next year--but I don't think it belongs in the same tier as Stanford. For most types of big law, SLS and CLS are basically peer schools. But for almost everything else--clerkships, academia, elite PI--Stanford is better. It's going to take more than a shift in a magazine's ranking system to change that.NightHooded wrote:Just noticed the USNWR rankings: 100, 97, 93, 91 for YHSC!
Are we moving towards YH and SC? Is Stanford's future in danger?
- Dignan

- Posts: 1110
- Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2009 5:52 pm
Re: Yale v. Stanford
I don't think it's better for anything else, but I do think that CLS is a peer to Stanford in non-West Coast markets. At least that's the impression I have after talking to a couple of high placed attorneys in Chicago.crackberry wrote:Plus I think one could make the argument that Stanford owns the West Coast in a way that Columbia most certainly does not own the East Coast (or even NYC). Sure, CLS is better than SLS for NYC BigLaw, but is it better for anything else?Dignan wrote:I like Columbia--I might even be going there next year--but I don't think it belongs in the same tier as Stanford. For most types of big law, SLS and CLS are basically peer schools. But for almost everything else--clerkships, academia, elite PI--Stanford is better. It's going to take more than a shift in a magazine's ranking system to change that.NightHooded wrote:Just noticed the USNWR rankings: 100, 97, 93, 91 for YHSC!
Are we moving towards YH and SC? Is Stanford's future in danger?
Also, I'm not sure that it's harder for a CLS grad to break into the California market than it is for a SLS grad to break into the New York market. CLS grads do extraordinarily well out here. I think I've shared this before:
http://www.calvin.edu/admin/csr/student ... w/data.htm
Check out San Francisco. CLS almost keeps pace with SLS. I know that CLS is twice as big as SLS, but when you consider how many CLS grads self-select into the NYC market, it's remarkable how well CLS does in Cali.
Like I said, I think the two schools are peers for big law, but not other things.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- crackberry

- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: Yale v. Stanford
Yeah, I generally agree with that. CLS is definitely better for NYC BigLaw and is probably equal (if not better) for DC BigLaw. I do think, however, that all things being equal, the SLS grad gets the California BigLaw job over the CLS grad.Dignan wrote:Like I said, I think the two schools are peers for big law, but not other things.
And then for academia, clerkships, elite PI, etc., like you said, SLS is better.
-
NightHooded

- Posts: 81
- Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2010 12:56 am
Re: Yale v. Stanford
How much of the low NYC-representation is due to Stanford self-selection?
How much "better" is NYC big law than west coast big law? I really don't know about the differences.
Part of me would think Stanford has an advantage due to being "boutique" compared to Harvard and Columbia. I am surprised NYC doesn't hold Stanford in higher regard
How much "better" is NYC big law than west coast big law? I really don't know about the differences.
Part of me would think Stanford has an advantage due to being "boutique" compared to Harvard and Columbia. I am surprised NYC doesn't hold Stanford in higher regard
- Nom Sawyer

- Posts: 913
- Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2009 1:28 am
Re: Yale v. Stanford
You considering coming to H then?crackberry wrote:Well, to be fair, it would be more like Y-H-S-C.NightHooded wrote:Just noticed the USNWR rankings: 100, 97, 93, 91 for YHSC!
Are we moving towards YH and SC? Is Stanford's future in danger?
- crackberry

- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: Yale v. Stanford
A surprisingly high number of SLS grads end up in NYC, and I don't think they have too much trouble finding work, but I'd imagine that because there are so many fewer SLS grads working in NYC than there are HLS and CLS grads, that the institutional brand just isn't the same.NightHooded wrote:How much of the low NYC-representation is due to Stanford self-selection?
How much "better" is NYC big law than west coast big law? I really don't know about the differences.![]()
Part of me would think Stanford has an advantage due to being "boutique" compared to Harvard and Columbia. I am surprised NYC doesn't hold Stanford in higher regard
Everything I've read and heard is that hiring partners LOVE to hire alums from their law schools, which definitely benefits schools like CLS in NYC. Because there aren't many SLS grads working in NYC in the first place (relative to CLS and HLS), SLS grads who want NYC don't have the same connections as CLS grads. Incidentally, this is also why SLS owns California.
- crackberry

- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: Yale v. Stanford
Thank you, but no, I am not really considering it. If I wanted East Coast BigLaw, there's no question I'd go to HLS over SLS, but I want West Coast PI, so I think SLS is going to serve my career interests better than any school except (perhaps) Yale. Plus, SLS' LRAP is better than HLS' LIPP, which matters in my case.Nom Sawyer wrote:You considering coming to H then?crackberry wrote:Well, to be fair, it would be more like Y-H-S-C.NightHooded wrote:Just noticed the USNWR rankings: 100, 97, 93, 91 for YHSC!
Are we moving towards YH and SC? Is Stanford's future in danger?Congrats Again on your acceptance.
Last edited by crackberry on Wed Apr 14, 2010 2:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Dignan

- Posts: 1110
- Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2009 5:52 pm
Re: Yale v. Stanford
Quite a bit, I think. Same for the DC market.NightHooded wrote:How much of the low NYC-representation is due to Stanford self-selection?
Last weekend, I spoke to dozens of current Berkeley Law students. The overwhelming majority had zero interest in even considering a job back East. I have a possible interest in the DC market, and I talked to a couple of Berkeley 3Ls who were targeting DC. They were doing quite well (they both landed 2L summer associate gigs with elite DC firms), and they claimed that the (relatively few) Berkeley students who were focused on East Coast markets were, if anything, doing better than the students who wanted to work in California.
Stanford isn't quite as Cali-focused as Berkeley, but I imagine that a similar dynamic is going on there.
-
NightHooded

- Posts: 81
- Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2010 12:56 am
Re: Yale v. Stanford
I'm now curious how end-all and be-all NYC is for big law. Can you become a "power player" solely on the west coast?
- BioEBear2010

- Posts: 745
- Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2008 7:05 pm
Re: Yale v. Stanford
For most types of law, NYC and DC rule as kings. NYC is the place to be for nearly all forms of corporate law (IP being the most notable exception), and DC is the place to be for all governmental law. The west coast legal market is growing, but it is still tiny compared to the east coast.NightHooded wrote:I'm now curious how end-all and be-all NYC is for big law. Can you become a "power player" solely on the west coast?
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login