171 vs. 173 no?sfdreaming09 wrote:I agree with you that a few questions on the LSAT does not--in any way--differentiate people based on intelligence. But, I think the difference in median LSAT scores is 3 points, which probably correlates to 4 questions.crackberry wrote:This is going to be an agree-to-disagree situation. I do not think that Harvard students are "more academically inclined" than Stanford students simply because they got, on average, two additional questions right on one four-hour test. That seems to be a ludicrous argument.
Stanford v. Harvard? Forum
- crackberry
- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: Stanford v. Harvard?
- crackberry
- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: Stanford v. Harvard?
Care to expand DC? Via PM maybe? California v. NE? I'm pretty familiar with that.DoubleChecks wrote:man, if you guys were me, this would be such an easy problem
i have 2 equally smart (though distinctly so) friends who happen to each represent HLS/SLS
haha if you knew the 2 of them, you'd know what i was thinking (hard to put into words), but one gives me the feel of what a SLS student would be, and the other what a HLS student would be
once again, both equally smart but may go about it...no, feel different about it -- just comes down to which friend you like hanging out with more haha
- englawyer
- Posts: 1271
- Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 10:57 pm
Re: Stanford v. Harvard?
2-3 points on the LSAT is not sufficient to distinguish between person a and person b. however, if we were to have a set of hypothetical intelligence battles, and draw randomly one person from S and one person from H, the person at H will have more intellectual horsepower on average.
that is still a weird reason to choose H over S though
that is still a weird reason to choose H over S though

-
- Posts: 273
- Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 12:54 pm
Re: Stanford v. Harvard?
Can't seem to find the most recent median #s, but the 25/75 are 170/175 v. 167/172.crackberry wrote:171 vs. 173 no?sfdreaming09 wrote:I agree with you that a few questions on the LSAT does not--in any way--differentiate people based on intelligence. But, I think the difference in median LSAT scores is 3 points, which probably correlates to 4 questions.crackberry wrote:This is going to be an agree-to-disagree situation. I do not think that Harvard students are "more academically inclined" than Stanford students simply because they got, on average, two additional questions right on one four-hour test. That seems to be a ludicrous argument.
http://www.ilrg.com/rankings/law/index. ... sc/LSATLow
- crackberry
- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: Stanford v. Harvard?
I could have sworn that massive LSAT sheet showed 168/172 for SLS.sfdreaming09 wrote:Can't seem to find the most recent median #s, but the 25/75 are 170/175 v. 167/172.crackberry wrote:171 vs. 173 no?sfdreaming09 wrote:I agree with you that a few questions on the LSAT does not--in any way--differentiate people based on intelligence. But, I think the difference in median LSAT scores is 3 points, which probably correlates to 4 questions.crackberry wrote:This is going to be an agree-to-disagree situation. I do not think that Harvard students are "more academically inclined" than Stanford students simply because they got, on average, two additional questions right on one four-hour test. That seems to be a ludicrous argument.
http://www.ilrg.com/rankings/law/index. ... sc/LSATLow
Also, I'm nearly positive the medians are 171 (SLS) and 173 (HLS).
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Lmao Zedong
- Posts: 381
- Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2009 12:10 am
Re: Stanford v. Harvard?
this is a nice, succinct way of making the point I was trying to make earlier. except that I do think it is a legitimate (though not a major) reason to like one school more than anotherenglawyer wrote:2-3 points on the LSAT is not sufficient to distinguish between person a and person b. however, if we were to have a set of hypothetical intelligence battles, and draw randomly one person from S and one person from H, the person at H will have more intellectual horsepower on average.
that is still a weird reason to choose H over S though
- booboo
- Posts: 1032
- Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 10:39 pm
Re: Stanford v. Harvard?
I thought it was 170 for SLS. ILRG's info is outdated.crackberry wrote:I could have sworn that massive LSAT sheet showed 168/172 for SLS.sfdreaming09 wrote:Can't seem to find the most recent median #s, but the 25/75 are 170/175 v. 167/172.crackberry wrote:171 vs. 173 no?sfdreaming09 wrote: I agree with you that a few questions on the LSAT does not--in any way--differentiate people based on intelligence. But, I think the difference in median LSAT scores is 3 points, which probably correlates to 4 questions.
http://www.ilrg.com/rankings/law/index. ... sc/LSATLow
Also, I'm nearly positive the medians are 171 (SLS) and 173 (HLS).
- crackberry
- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: Stanford v. Harvard?
First, by "massive LSAT sheet" I meant "massive LSAC sheet," and second, I think SLS' median was 170 until last year, when it bumped up to 171.booboo wrote:I thought it was 170 for SLS. ILRG's info is outdated.
- skynet
- Posts: 134
- Joined: Fri Dec 18, 2009 10:40 am
Re: Stanford v. Harvard?
anyone on this thread understand the differences between the 2 schools' LRAPs?
My impression is that pays higher percentage but with more restrictions on which jobs are eligible and how long assistance remains available. Also, H will cover up to 30k in undergrad debt, not sure if S will.
sorry if this gets us off the thrilling topic of useless stereotypes...
My impression is that pays higher percentage but with more restrictions on which jobs are eligible and how long assistance remains available. Also, H will cover up to 30k in undergrad debt, not sure if S will.
sorry if this gets us off the thrilling topic of useless stereotypes...
-
- Posts: 253
- Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2009 10:27 am
Re: Stanford v. Harvard?
skynet wrote:anyone on this thread understand the differences between the 2 schools' LRAPs?
My impression is that pays higher percentage but with more restrictions on which jobs are eligible and how long assistance remains available. Also, H will cover up to 30k in undergrad debt, not sure if S will.
sorry if this gets us off the thrilling topic of useless stereotypes...
So from the research I've done, SLS's LRAP blows Harvard's out of the water. HOWEVER...although HLS canceled their "paid 3L year if going into public service", they promised something to replace it "by March 2010". So perhaps this will make up the difference (if not put them on top).
- skynet
- Posts: 134
- Joined: Fri Dec 18, 2009 10:40 am
Re: Stanford v. Harvard?
I wish information could travel faster than light (possibly by harnessing quantum entanglement?) so that I wouldn't have to wait till March to find out.lawyering wrote:
So from the research I've done, SLS's LRAP blows Harvard's out of the water. HOWEVER...although HLS canceled their "paid 3L year if going into public service", they promised something to replace it "by March 2010". So perhaps this will make up the difference (if not put them on top).
Time travel is going to be so awesome. The future will be yesterday.
-
- Posts: 33
- Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2010 1:29 am
Re: Stanford v. Harvard?
Harvard UG here. I'd say all the biggest douchebags from all over the country go to HLS to practice the highest form of douchebaggery.treple wrote:HLS students are very different from Harvard undergrads with regard to general douchbaggery.
- crackberry
- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: Stanford v. Harvard?
SLS and YLS have the best LRAPs in the country, followed closely by Berkeley and then Columbia and NYU. Harvard lags behind all of these.skynet wrote:anyone on this thread understand the differences between the 2 schools' LRAPs?
My impression is that pays higher percentage but with more restrictions on which jobs are eligible and how long assistance remains available. Also, H will cover up to 30k in undergrad debt, not sure if S will.
sorry if this gets us off the thrilling topic of useless stereotypes...
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 253
- Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2009 10:27 am
Re: Stanford v. Harvard?
wait, crackberry, do you happen to dislike harvard?crackberry wrote:SLS and YLS have the best LRAPs in the country, followed closely by Berkeley and then Columbia and NYU. Harvard lags behind all of these.skynet wrote:anyone on this thread understand the differences between the 2 schools' LRAPs?
My impression is that pays higher percentage but with more restrictions on which jobs are eligible and how long assistance remains available. Also, H will cover up to 30k in undergrad debt, not sure if S will.
sorry if this gets us off the thrilling topic of useless stereotypes...

- crackberry
- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: Stanford v. Harvard?
Only until JR calls me back. Even then, though, I'm nearly positive I'll be in Palo Alto in August.lawyering wrote:wait, crackberry, do you happen to dislike harvard?i had no idea.
And that LRAP comment is true despite my feelings toward Harvard.
-
- Posts: 253
- Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2009 10:27 am
Re: Stanford v. Harvard?
Hmm well...I'm taking a diff approach with Yale and sending nothing but positive vibes their way. To each their own! Wishing for a quick JR call for you, but sounds like it's not going to change anything, other than possibly your opinion of HLS.
- crackberry
- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: Stanford v. Harvard?
FWIW, I've got nothing but positive things to say about Yale. What a JR2 would do for me is get me to fly to Cambridge and do my due diligence. It'd take a minor miracle to sway me to HLS though.lawyering wrote:Hmm well...I'm taking a diff approach with Yale and sending nothing but positive vibes their way. To each their own! Wishing for a quick JR call for you, but sounds like it's not going to change anything, other than possibly your opinion of HLS.
Nearly all of my distaste for Harvard stems from UG (won't get into it), but I also much prefer the small class sizes of YLS and SLS to the behemoth that is HLS' 1L class.
Oh, and California > East Coast, too.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- englawyer
- Posts: 1271
- Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 10:57 pm
Re: Stanford v. Harvard?
false. harvard UG are usually the bigger douchebags. i am sure you are the exception thoughzanyventer wrote:Harvard UG here. I'd say all the biggest douchebags from all over the country go to HLS to practice the highest form of douchebaggery.treple wrote:HLS students are very different from Harvard undergrads with regard to general douchbaggery.

-
- Posts: 253
- Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2009 10:27 am
Re: Stanford v. Harvard?
I'm pickier about the specific city. For me, Berkeley > NYC > Boston > Palo Alto.crackberry wrote:FWIW, I've got nothing but positive things to say about Yale. What a JR2 would do for me is get me to fly to Cambridge and do my due diligence. It'd take a minor miracle to sway me to HLS though.lawyering wrote:Hmm well...I'm taking a diff approach with Yale and sending nothing but positive vibes their way. To each their own! Wishing for a quick JR call for you, but sounds like it's not going to change anything, other than possibly your opinion of HLS.
Nearly all of my distaste for Harvard stems from UG (won't get into it), but I also much prefer the small class sizes of YLS and SLS to the behemoth that is HLS' 1L class.
Oh, and California > East Coast, too.
-
- Posts: 253
- Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2009 10:27 am
Re: Stanford v. Harvard?
FWIW, assuming you do get in, if you visit with the idea that you're only doing your "due diligence" i guarantee you won't like it. I hope when that time comes, you have somewhat of an open mind...as I am going to try to have an open mind about SLS despite my negative first visit.crackberry wrote:FWIW, I've got nothing but positive things to say about Yale. What a JR2 would do for me is get me to fly to Cambridge and do my due diligence. It'd take a minor miracle to sway me to HLS though.lawyering wrote:Hmm well...I'm taking a diff approach with Yale and sending nothing but positive vibes their way. To each their own! Wishing for a quick JR call for you, but sounds like it's not going to change anything, other than possibly your opinion of HLS.
Nearly all of my distaste for Harvard stems from UG (won't get into it), but I also much prefer the small class sizes of YLS and SLS to the behemoth that is HLS' 1L class.
Oh, and California > East Coast, too.
- skynet
- Posts: 134
- Joined: Fri Dec 18, 2009 10:40 am
Re: Stanford v. Harvard?
Does this put Boalt in the running for you?lawyering wrote:I'm pickier about the specific city. For me, Berkeley > NYC > Boston > Palo Alto.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 253
- Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2009 10:27 am
Re: Stanford v. Harvard?
It did before my cycle--probably not now. City is only one (and not the biggest) factor in my decision. I thought about calling SLS or HLS and begging them to move to San Fran/Berkeley...sigh.skynet wrote:Does this put Boalt in the running for you?lawyering wrote:I'm pickier about the specific city. For me, Berkeley > NYC > Boston > Palo Alto.
- crackberry
- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: Stanford v. Harvard?
It's not so much that I love Palo Alto, but more that I love having Yosemite, Tahoe, Big Sur, etc. within a few hours drive. You don't get anything remotely close to that within a day's drive of HLS (the Maine coast is the closest thing and even that is only awesome in the summer, when I likely wouldn't be in Cambridge anyway).lawyering wrote:I'm pickier about the specific city. For me, Berkeley > NYC > Boston > Palo Alto.
Yeah, I mean the truth is I love Cambridge and Harvard's campus. It's the people I never really took a liking to. If I get in, I will approach my visit with a clean slate. But I will still be leaning toward SLS.lawyering wrote:FWIW, assuming you do get in, if you visit with the idea that you're only doing your "due diligence" i guarantee you won't like it. I hope when that time comes, you have somewhat of an open mind...as I am going to try to have an open mind about SLS despite my negative first visit.
-
- Posts: 253
- Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2009 10:27 am
Re: Stanford v. Harvard?
Hahaha. You're very optimistic about how much free time you're going to have while in LS. From what I hear, it's not quite like undergrad...just throwing that out there. I've talked to SLS students who almost never even made it into San Fran, nevermind a few hours away. And from Boston, you can do a LOT better on public transport within 4-8 hours (or by flight in 1-2) than you can from Palo Alto. Providence is 1 hr away. New York is 3.5. Philly and DC are also quite accessible, all via one short flight or train ride. Granted, in winter, I'd much rather be gallavanting around Northern Cali, no question. But who has time for such things anyway? If I want a quick bite to eat, where would I rather be? From what I hear, Palo Alto is BORING.crackberry wrote:It's not so much that I love Palo Alto, but more that I love having Yosemite, Tahoe, Big Sur, etc. within a few hours drive. You don't get anything remotely close to that within a day's drive of HLS (the Maine coast is the closest thing and even that is only awesome in the summer, when I likely wouldn't be in Cambridge anyway).lawyering wrote:I'm pickier about the specific city. For me, Berkeley > NYC > Boston > Palo Alto.
- crackberry
- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: Stanford v. Harvard?
Yes, clearly there are more cities clustered closer together near Boston/Cambridge, but the East Coast just doesn't do it for me. I lived in New York my whole life before college and then in DC for a year after graduation. Sure, they're nice in Spring and Fall, but I'm a California boy.lawyering wrote:Hahaha. You're very optimistic about how much free time you're going to have while in LS. From what I hear, it's not quite like undergrad...just throwing that out there. I've talked to SLS students who almost never even made it into San Fran, nevermind a few hours away. And from Boston, you can do a LOT better on public transport within 4-8 hours (or by flight in 1-2) than you can from Palo Alto. Providence is 1 hr away. New York is 3.5. Philly and DC are also quite accessible, all via one short flight or train ride. Granted, in winter, I'd much rather be gallavanting around Northern Cali, no question. But who has time for such things anyway? If I want a quick bite to eat, where would I rather be? From what I hear, Palo Alto is BORING.crackberry wrote:It's not so much that I love Palo Alto, but more that I love having Yosemite, Tahoe, Big Sur, etc. within a few hours drive. You don't get anything remotely close to that within a day's drive of HLS (the Maine coast is the closest thing and even that is only awesome in the summer, when I likely wouldn't be in Cambridge anyway).lawyering wrote:I'm pickier about the specific city. For me, Berkeley > NYC > Boston > Palo Alto.
I know LS doesn't offer a lot of free time - at least not during 1L, but I don't plan on working all day Saturday and Sunday every weekend. I'm sure I'll find time to get off campus. It helps me refocus and relax, etc.
No, Palo Alto is not sweet. I spent four years there during undergrad. It's not a great town, but as far as food, it's fine. There aren't fun bars/clubs, but if I really want to let loose one weekend, I can drive to SF. I have plenty of friends who live there.
And San Francisco, FWIW, is my favorite US city.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login