University of Washington c/o 2016 Forum
-
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2013 6:44 pm
Re: University of Washington c/o 2016
Long-time lurker, first-time poster. Happy to be here.
Are people going to the ASW? Any idea what the community service project on the second day is?
Are people going to the ASW? Any idea what the community service project on the second day is?
- dproduct
- Posts: 4078
- Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2011 8:58 pm
Re: University of Washington c/o 2016
Withdrew. Good luck everyone.
-
- Posts: 46
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2013 3:16 pm
Re: University of Washington c/o 2016
Has this meeting happened yet? I would love to know what you found out. I'm considering a retake for scholarship purposes but I have the same feeling that the most likely outcome is it won't matter.WisemanAEKDB wrote:About the LSAT: looks like nearly no one got off of the WL from TLS last cycle, but those who did mostly heard back in the second week in May. I will ask the admission counselor I meet with what he/she thinks is the best course of action. I don't think the June LSAT would benefit my situation. But it never hurts to ask.
- WisemanAEKDB
- Posts: 329
- Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2013 7:01 pm
Re: University of Washington c/o 2016
Not yet. I'm pretty sold on UW and I'm gunning for an acceptance off of the WL. I think I'll either be accepted in May or June, or I won't be getting an acceptance. LSAT scores back the first week in July... The only way I'd retake at this point was if I was 100% committed to deferring for a year and working, which is still an option, but I don't know. I'm so confused. Law school make my brain hurt and I haven't even sat in a single day of classes yet...GM544 wrote:Has this meeting happened yet? I would love to know what you found out. I'm considering a retake for scholarship purposes but I have the same feeling that the most likely outcome is it won't matter.WisemanAEKDB wrote:About the LSAT: looks like nearly no one got off of the WL from TLS last cycle, but those who did mostly heard back in the second week in May. I will ask the admission counselor I meet with what he/she thinks is the best course of action. I don't think the June LSAT would benefit my situation. But it never hurts to ask.
- simplycatalina
- Posts: 935
- Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2012 7:41 pm
Re: University of Washington c/o 2016
Who's going to the ASW on April 5 and 6??
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2013 6:49 pm
Re: University of Washington c/o 2016
Long time lurker but first post. I love UW, but was shocked by the nonexistent scholly offer. Anyone else disappointed with their scholarship offer/ had any luck negotiating?
- intlsplitr
- Posts: 177
- Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2012 9:00 pm
Re: University of Washington c/o 2016
Yeah, definitely disappointed here as well. I got nothing. Zilch. Nada. I was seriously considering UW, but not at sticker. I'll be withdrawing shortly; I hope one of you get the spot!warrior23 wrote:Long time lurker but first post. I love UW, but was shocked by the nonexistent scholly offer. Anyone else disappointed with their scholarship offer/ had any luck negotiating?
-
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2013 6:44 pm
Re: University of Washington c/o 2016
Sooo disappointed. I know my numbers aren't great, and I really didn't expect anything, but I was hoping that there was some small, token amount that they would send my way to say that they want me to go there. I'd be fine with no money if I were still in-state, but I'm not.warrior23 wrote:Long time lurker but first post. I love UW, but was shocked by the nonexistent scholly offer. Anyone else disappointed with their scholarship offer/ had any luck negotiating?
I (barely) avoided sending a drunken angry email in response. That would've been a poor negotiating tactic.
-
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2013 6:44 pm
Re: University of Washington c/o 2016
I will be. It got me out of jury duty.cbarlow1016 wrote:Who's going to the ASW on April 5 and 6??
- dproduct
- Posts: 4078
- Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2011 8:58 pm
Re: University of Washington c/o 2016
intlsplitr wrote:Yeah, definitely disappointed here as well. I got nothing. Zilch. Nada. I was seriously considering UW, but not at sticker. I'll be withdrawing shortly; I hope one of you get the spot!warrior23 wrote:Long time lurker but first post. I love UW, but was shocked by the nonexistent scholly offer. Anyone else disappointed with their scholarship offer/ had any luck negotiating?
I received nothing as well. It's laughable, really. The email itself was frustrating. Not only the portion about, "maybe we'll have more money later and give you something" but then the "we're still so affordable it doesn't matter!" No.Notorious BHG wrote:Sooo disappointed. I know my numbers aren't great, and I really didn't expect anything, but I was hoping that there was some small, token amount that they would send my way to say that they want me to go there. I'd be fine with no money if I were still in-state, but I'm not.
I (barely) avoided sending a drunken angry email in response. That would've been a poor negotiating tactic.



-
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2013 6:49 pm
Re: University of Washington c/o 2016
dproduct wrote:intlsplitr wrote:Yeah, definitely disappointed here as well. I got nothing. Zilch. Nada. I was seriously considering UW, but not at sticker. I'll be withdrawing shortly; I hope one of you get the spot!warrior23 wrote:Long time lurker but first post. I love UW, but was shocked by the nonexistent scholly offer. Anyone else disappointed with their scholarship offer/ had any luck negotiating?I received nothing as well. It's laughable, really. The email itself was frustrating. Not only the portion about, "maybe we'll have more money later and give you something" but then the "we're still so affordable it doesn't matter!" No.Notorious BHG wrote:Sooo disappointed. I know my numbers aren't great, and I really didn't expect anything, but I was hoping that there was some small, token amount that they would send my way to say that they want me to go there. I'd be fine with no money if I were still in-state, but I'm not.
I (barely) avoided sending a drunken angry email in response. That would've been a poor negotiating tactic.![]()
![]()
I know! I heard that they were stingy, but I had no idea that we would receive nothing. What are all of your thoughts about UW at sticker? I am not so sure they are worth their price tag.
- dproduct
- Posts: 4078
- Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2011 8:58 pm
Re: University of Washington c/o 2016
Me personally? It was an easy withdrawal. Normally I'd be upset, but at this point in the cycle, I need reasons to eliminate choices, so I'm not too disappointed. Good luck with your decision.warrior23 wrote:I know! I heard that they were stingy, but I had no idea that we would receive nothing. What are all of your thoughts about UW at sticker? I am not so sure they are worth their price tag.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- johnsbren
- Posts: 33
- Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2012 4:54 pm
Re: University of Washington c/o 2016
so everyone is posting about how they got nothing in offers, but how did you find out? Have people been receiving emails or is it snail mail? I applied the day I was able to access the admitted students site (i think towards the beginning of february) and still I've heard nothing. When have people been receiving them?
-
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2013 6:49 pm
Re: University of Washington c/o 2016
I received an email on Friday night saying that they were not going to extend a merit scholarship offer to me. I am not sure about others.johnsbren wrote:so everyone is posting about how they got nothing in offers, but how did you find out? Have people been receiving emails or is it snail mail? I applied the day I was able to access the admitted students site (i think towards the beginning of february) and still I've heard nothing. When have people been receiving them?
- intlsplitr
- Posts: 177
- Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2012 9:00 pm
Re: University of Washington c/o 2016
Via email on Friday.johnsbren wrote:so everyone is posting about how they got nothing in offers, but how did you find out? Have people been receiving emails or is it snail mail? I applied the day I was able to access the admitted students site (i think towards the beginning of february) and still I've heard nothing. When have people been receiving them?
- simplycatalina
- Posts: 935
- Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2012 7:41 pm
Re: University of Washington c/o 2016
Always a good reason.Notorious BHG wrote:I will be. It got me out of jury duty.cbarlow1016 wrote:Who's going to the ASW on April 5 and 6??
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 181
- Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2012 3:40 pm
Re: University of Washington c/o 2016
It seems to me that they will probably provide more scholarships later when some students commit? Like maybe they are targeting their median students before the 75th and above scorers because I can't imagine that some of you on here wouldn't receive any merit offer.
- b123
- Posts: 183
- Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2012 2:32 pm
Re: University of Washington c/o 2016
Has anyone attempted negotiations?
-
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Mon Mar 25, 2013 10:31 pm
Re: University of Washington c/o 2016
I got an email saying no aid. And like a previous applicant, the email included a self-congratulatory statement about how affordable UW is.johnsbren wrote:so everyone is posting about how they got nothing in offers, but how did you find out? Have people been receiving emails or is it snail mail? I applied the day I was able to access the admitted students site (i think towards the beginning of february) and still I've heard nothing. When have people been receiving them?
I didn't put this in withdrawal, but since it seems clear that the UW admissions people read the forums, I may as well put it here: Admissions staff, that's an insult, and that sentence should be removed from future financial aid emails. UW has every right in the world to charge $42K to out-of-state students. And UW is welcome to bar OOS students from residency as well, if that's what they want to do. But with their own calculations of living expenses--assuming they aren't overly conservative--that's nearly $200K for a three-year education at a regional school--a great one, but a regional school--in a tight legal market with no real LRAP. At sticker price, that's not affordable, and it's simply not a good deal compared with many similarly placed universities. If UW aspires to be, as it states, the best law school in the country, it should expect to be admitting people who aren't dumb enough to read a claim like that and find it offensively out of touch.
Nobody's entitled to aid, and I wouldn't disparage anyone who's able or willing to pay OOS tuition at sticker price--that's a great choice for many people, I'm sure. But a deal it is not.
UW was first choice, but I declined in favor of a comparably ranked school elsewhere that offered almost a free ride.
Good luck to all!
-
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2013 6:49 pm
Re: University of Washington c/o 2016
sunspot wrote:I got an email saying no aid. And like a previous applicant, the email included a self-congratulatory statement about how affordable UW is.johnsbren wrote:so everyone is posting about how they got nothing in offers, but how did you find out? Have people been receiving emails or is it snail mail? I applied the day I was able to access the admitted students site (i think towards the beginning of february) and still I've heard nothing. When have people been receiving them?
I didn't put this in withdrawal, but since it seems clear that the UW admissions people read the forums, I may as well put it here: Admissions staff, that's an insult, and that sentence should be removed from future financial aid emails. UW has every right in the world to charge $42K to out-of-state students. And UW is welcome to bar OOS students from residency as well, if that's what they want to do. But with their own calculations of living expenses--assuming they aren't overly conservative--that's nearly $200K for a three-year education at a regional school--a great one, but a regional school--in a tight legal market with no real LRAP. At sticker price, that's not affordable, and it's simply not a good deal compared with many similarly placed universities. If UW aspires to be, as it states, the best law school in the country, it should expect to be admitting people who aren't dumb enough to read a claim like that and find it offensively out of touch.
Nobody's entitled to aid, and I wouldn't disparage anyone who's able or willing to pay OOS tuition at sticker price--that's a great choice for many people, I'm sure. But a deal it is not.
UW was first choice, but I declined in favor of a comparably ranked school elsewhere that offered almost a free ride.
Good luck to all!
Best post. Couldn't agree more.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 79
- Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2011 5:24 pm
Re: University of Washington c/o 2016
I see where all of you are coming from, but the amount of entitlement for merit scharships that people on this forum have is ridiculous and kind of infuriating actually. One of you has a 160 LSAT. You should be happy to have been accepted at all! If you don't want to have debt, go to another school that does offer you money. Don't act as if you're just entitled to a full ride to your reach school and talk about how you are thinking of drunkenly emailing them about how you deserve aid because you've determined that's the case. Man, I'm sure no one will agree with ne, but this whole page really rubs me the wrong way.warrior23 wrote:dproduct wrote:intlsplitr wrote:Yeah, definitely disappointed here as well. I got nothing. Zilch. Nada. I was seriously considering UW, but not at sticker. I'll be withdrawing shortly; I hope one of you get the spot!warrior23 wrote:Long time lurker but first post. I love UW, but was shocked by the nonexistent scholly offer. Anyone else disappointed with their scholarship offer/ had any luck negotiating?I received nothing as well. It's laughable, really. The email itself was frustrating. Not only the portion about, "maybe we'll have more money later and give you something" but then the "we're still so affordable it doesn't matter!" No.Notorious BHG wrote:Sooo disappointed. I know my numbers aren't great, and I really didn't expect anything, but I was hoping that there was some small, token amount that they would send my way to say that they want me to go there. I'd be fine with no money if I were still in-state, but I'm not.
I (barely) avoided sending a drunken angry email in response. That would've been a poor negotiating tactic.![]()
![]()
I know! I heard that they were stingy, but I had no idea that we would receive nothing. What are all of your thoughts about UW at sticker? I am not so sure they are worth their price tag.
-
- Posts: 54
- Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2012 5:00 pm
Re: University of Washington c/o 2016
I see where all of you are coming from, but the amount of entitlement for merit scharships that people on this forum have is ridiculous and kind of infuriating actually. One of you has a 160 LSAT. You should be happy to have been accepted at all! If you don't want to have debt, go to another school that does offer you money. Don't act as if you're just entitled to a full ride to your reach school and talk about how you are thinking of drunkenly emailing them about how you deserve aid because you've determined that's the case. Man, I'm sure no one will agree with ne, but this whole page really rubs me the wrong way.[/quote]
Hey "Useless Knowledge", If a school accepts a student given the current economic climate and employment prospect, that school should be willing to accept some of the risk for its student. I have read MULTIPLE posts by lawyers who are struggling to pay their rent and eat while their alma mater is sitting fat happy.
Your use of the concept of "entitlement" is incorrect. What students have been upset about with respect to UW, is the fact that a STATE school receiving PUBLIC FUNDING from peoples taxes is not sharing the wealth. Instead, what UW has chosen to do is show a small piece of the DIRECT and INDIRECT opportunity costs related to attending UW Law School, and then stake a claim that its so cheap to attend that there is no need for tuition assistance. Not a good idea on UW's part, and may be a sign that their falling rankings (for 20 to 28) may only be the beginning of a more dramatic fall to come.
Imagine what would happen if aspiring law students came together and vetoed UW's current attitude by simply NOT attending! Once you attend its over....they have you. You have acquired a sunk cost that you can never get back....So BEFORE you attend any law school, please make sure that you are getting the best deal YOU know is right....NOT the deal that the school is claiming is right for you! Buyer PLEASE BEWARE!
Hey "Useless Knowledge", If a school accepts a student given the current economic climate and employment prospect, that school should be willing to accept some of the risk for its student. I have read MULTIPLE posts by lawyers who are struggling to pay their rent and eat while their alma mater is sitting fat happy.
Your use of the concept of "entitlement" is incorrect. What students have been upset about with respect to UW, is the fact that a STATE school receiving PUBLIC FUNDING from peoples taxes is not sharing the wealth. Instead, what UW has chosen to do is show a small piece of the DIRECT and INDIRECT opportunity costs related to attending UW Law School, and then stake a claim that its so cheap to attend that there is no need for tuition assistance. Not a good idea on UW's part, and may be a sign that their falling rankings (for 20 to 28) may only be the beginning of a more dramatic fall to come.
Imagine what would happen if aspiring law students came together and vetoed UW's current attitude by simply NOT attending! Once you attend its over....they have you. You have acquired a sunk cost that you can never get back....So BEFORE you attend any law school, please make sure that you are getting the best deal YOU know is right....NOT the deal that the school is claiming is right for you! Buyer PLEASE BEWARE!
-
- Posts: 54
- Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2012 5:00 pm
Re: University of Washington c/o 2016
Hey "Useless Knowledge", If a school accepts a student given the current economic climate and employment prospect, that school should be willing to accept some of the risk for its student. I have read MULTIPLE posts by lawyers who are struggling to pay their rent and eat while their alma mater is sitting fat happy.
Your use of the concept of "entitlement" is incorrect. What students have been upset about with respect to UW, is the fact that a STATE school receiving PUBLIC FUNDING from peoples taxes is not sharing the wealth. Instead, what UW has chosen to do is show a small piece of the DIRECT and INDIRECT opportunity costs related to attending UW Law School, and then stake a claim that its so cheap to attend that there is no need for tuition assistance. Not a good idea on UW's part, and may be a sign that their falling rankings (for 20 to 28) may only be the beginning of a more dramatic fall to come.
Imagine what would happen if aspiring law students came together and vetoed UW's current attitude by simply NOT attending! Once you attend its over....they have you. You have acquired a sunk cost that you can never get back....So BEFORE you attend any law school, please make sure that you are getting the best deal YOU know is right....NOT the deal that the school is claiming is right for you! Buyer PLEASE BEWARE!
Your use of the concept of "entitlement" is incorrect. What students have been upset about with respect to UW, is the fact that a STATE school receiving PUBLIC FUNDING from peoples taxes is not sharing the wealth. Instead, what UW has chosen to do is show a small piece of the DIRECT and INDIRECT opportunity costs related to attending UW Law School, and then stake a claim that its so cheap to attend that there is no need for tuition assistance. Not a good idea on UW's part, and may be a sign that their falling rankings (for 20 to 28) may only be the beginning of a more dramatic fall to come.
Imagine what would happen if aspiring law students came together and vetoed UW's current attitude by simply NOT attending! Once you attend its over....they have you. You have acquired a sunk cost that you can never get back....So BEFORE you attend any law school, please make sure that you are getting the best deal YOU know is right....NOT the deal that the school is claiming is right for you! Buyer PLEASE BEWARE!
-
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2013 6:44 pm
Re: University of Washington c/o 2016
Notorious BHG wrote:Sooo disappointed. I know my numbers aren't great, and I really didn't expect anything, but I was hoping that there was some small, token amount that they would send my way to say that they want me to go there. I'd be fine with no money if I were still in-state, but I'm not.
I (barely) avoided sending a drunken angry email in response. That would've been a poor negotiating tactic.
Perhaps you missed the part where I acknowledged that, because of my less-than-stellar numbers, I didn't expect to receive any money. Perhaps you also missed the part where I said that a small amount of money (not a full ride) would've been a nice gesture. You know how your grandma would send you a card on Valentine's Day with $5 tucked inside? That's what I was hoping for, though I was absolutely happy to be receiving the card.UselessKnowledge wrote:I see where all of you are coming from, but the amount of entitlement for merit scharships that people on this forum have is ridiculous and kind of infuriating actually. One of you has a 160 LSAT. You should be happy to have been accepted at all! If you don't want to have debt, go to another school that does offer you money. Don't act as if you're just entitled to a full ride to your reach school and talk about how you are thinking of drunkenly emailing them about how you deserve aid because you've determined that's the case. Man, I'm sure no one will agree with ne, but this whole page really rubs me the wrong way.
P.S. The drunken email was tongue in cheek.
(Edited to clean up quotes.)
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login