Thanks JMJ.JamMasterJ wrote:meaning that if people are still above the gpa median, there is less competition for reverse splitter "spots" than there was before, al least hypothetically.Perdevise wrote:I meant that the GPA scores skyrocketed while LSAT sat at the same place. My LSAT is below median but my GPA still holds up.MiamiOxford wrote:Do explain... Reverse splitters looked at more favorably now possibly? That would be sweet.Perdevise wrote:Submitted a while ago (Oct. 15) but wanted to share. Chicago is still my top choice. The new GPA data makes me feel a bit better about my reverse-splitter status.
This would be easier to determine if it was the LSAT score that we were talking about b/c it's easier to predict how my traditional splitters will exist at each value, but yes, it does probably bode well for you guys
Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle) Forum
- Perdevise
- Posts: 367
- Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2011 7:45 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Last edited by Perdevise on Wed Nov 02, 2011 5:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Dany
- Posts: 11559
- Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 3:00 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Yeah I'd come after Jan. 3. You'll want to sit in on a class and see what the law school is like with actual students there. I actually visited on the first day of a quarter.JamMasterJ wrote:Hey, current students: If I end up getting accepted ED, I want to come up over my fiancee's Christmas (basically Dec 20 - Jan 10 or so). It looks like you get back for winter quarter on Jan 3. Would that be a good time to come up?

- JamMasterJ
- Posts: 6649
- Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 7:17 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Not that I'd have any choice by that point...Dany wrote:Yeah I'd come after Jan. 3. You'll want to sit in on a class and see what the law school is like with actual students there. I actually visited on the first day of a quarter.JamMasterJ wrote:Hey, current students: If I end up getting accepted ED, I want to come up over my fiancee's Christmas (basically Dec 20 - Jan 10 or so). It looks like you get back for winter quarter on Jan 3. Would that be a good time to come up?

Thanks Dany
- Xifeng
- Posts: 2553
- Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2011 3:59 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Yeah, definitely come at the beginning of the quarter! And there are tours and things that won't be in session while we're all gone.
- JamMasterJ
- Posts: 6649
- Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 7:17 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Sweet!! Well, hopefully I'll see you guys thenXifeng wrote:Yeah, definitely come at the beginning of the quarter! And there are tours and things that won't be in session while we're all gone.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- sandwiches5000
- Posts: 412
- Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 11:54 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Complete and it says this at the bottom:
Class Deposit 0.00 .00
Does this mean anything? (probably not.) Just thought it was weird.
Class Deposit 0.00 .00
Does this mean anything? (probably not.) Just thought it was weird.
-
- Posts: 804
- Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2011 7:55 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Not wierd. It means you haven't paid a deposit yet.sandwiches5000 wrote:Complete and it says this at the bottom: Class Deposit 0.00 .00 Does this mean anything? (probably not.) Just thought it was weird.
- Bildungsroman
- Posts: 5529
- Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2010 2:42 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
And it doesn't indicate that you have been accepted and owe a deposit, either. The class deposit line showed up for all of last year's applicants almost immediately, regardless of whether they'd be accepted or rejected.jim-green wrote:Not wierd. It means you haven't paid a deposit yet.sandwiches5000 wrote:Complete and it says this at the bottom: Class Deposit 0.00 .00 Does this mean anything? (probably not.) Just thought it was weird.
-
- Posts: 804
- Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2011 7:55 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
It's only 11/3...too early to be accepted by Chi yet.Bildungsroman wrote:And it doesn't indicate that you have been accepted and owe a deposit, either. The class deposit line showed up for all of last year's applicants almost immediately, regardless of whether they'd be accepted or rejected.jim-green wrote:Not wierd. It means you haven't paid a deposit yet.sandwiches5000 wrote:Complete and it says this at the bottom: Class Deposit 0.00 .00 Does this mean anything? (probably not.) Just thought it was weird.
- Danny Mothers
- Posts: 129
- Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2011 1:25 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Just sent in my ED app... I'm relieved that it's out of my hands now
- euskadi
- Posts: 158
- Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2009 12:02 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Complete as of today! Looking forward to riding this one out with you all.
- Justdoingmybest
- Posts: 172
- Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2011 10:58 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Just went complete. Submitted 10/30
-
- Posts: 58
- Joined: Mon May 30, 2011 5:00 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Anyone know why Chicago asks what other schools you are applying to. Is there any reason not to answer this?
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- JamMasterJ
- Posts: 6649
- Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 7:17 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
they all do. IDK why Chicago would since YP isn't an issue for the T6kitkat450 wrote:Anyone know why Chicago asks what other schools you are applying to. Is there any reason not to answer this?
- Bildungsroman
- Posts: 5529
- Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2010 2:42 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
The occurrence of yield-protect in the T13 has been grossly overstated anyway. Literally the only T13 school I've seen demonstrating anything that looks like YP is UVA. But people still claim YP to pad their egos.JamMasterJ wrote:they all do. IDK why Chicago would since YP isn't an issue for the T6kitkat450 wrote:Anyone know why Chicago asks what other schools you are applying to. Is there any reason not to answer this?
- soj
- Posts: 7888
- Joined: Sat Jan 16, 2010 11:10 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Ego protection is definitely a huge part of it. The lack of a clear definition for yield protection complicates the issue, too.Bildungsroman wrote:The occurrence of yield-protect in the T13 has been grossly overstated anyway. Literally the only T13 school I've seen demonstrating anything that looks like YP is UVA. But people still claim YP to pad their egos.JamMasterJ wrote:they all do. IDK why Chicago would since YP isn't an issue for the T6kitkat450 wrote:Anyone know why Chicago asks what other schools you are applying to. Is there any reason not to answer this?
It's all very nebulous, of course, because we'll never know why rejected applicants were rejected. I think several T-13 schools yield protect, but couch yield protection in more PR-friendly vocabulary (e.g. "wanting to attend the school," softs). The degree of YP is definitely overstated on TLS, though. Some people don't want to accept that they were rejected not because their numbers are too high, but because they suck.
Last edited by soj on Sat Nov 05, 2011 6:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Hawkeye Pierce
- Posts: 1261
- Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2010 12:18 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
When Yale rejects me, it will almost assuredly be because of yield protection.Bildungsroman wrote:The occurrence of yield-protect in the T13 has been grossly overstated anyway. Literally the only T13 school I've seen demonstrating anything that looks like YP is UVA. But people still claim YP to pad their egos.JamMasterJ wrote:they all do. IDK why Chicago would since YP isn't an issue for the T6kitkat450 wrote:Anyone know why Chicago asks what other schools you are applying to. Is there any reason not to answer this?
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 307
- Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2011 4:19 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I know for a fact that Duke yield protects; was told by someone in the admissions office. It does happen.
- 80eight
- Posts: 170
- Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2011 10:18 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Tag! I applied at the beginning of October.
- Bildungsroman
- Posts: 5529
- Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2010 2:42 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I think the bolded is a big problem. Is it YP to reject someone who has numbers at or above the general admission threshold when it's clear by a lack of effort in their app that they have no interest in attending? I prefer that the use of the term "YP" be limited to egregious, American University-Style situations (check their LSN graph to see what I mean: http://american.lawschoolnumbers.com/stats/0910/ ).soj wrote:Ego protection is definitely a huge part of it. The lack of a clear definition for yield protection complicates the issue, too.Bildungsroman wrote:The occurrence of yield-protect in the T13 has been grossly overstated anyway. Literally the only T13 school I've seen demonstrating anything that looks like YP is UVA. But people still claim YP to pad their egos.JamMasterJ wrote:they all do. IDK why Chicago would since YP isn't an issue for the T6kitkat450 wrote:Anyone know why Chicago asks what other schools you are applying to. Is there any reason not to answer this?
It's all very nebulous, of course, because we'll never know why rejected applicants were rejected. I think several T-13 schools yield protect, but couch yield protection in more PR-friendly vocabulary (e.g. "wanting to attend the school," softs). The degree of YP is definitely overstated on TLS, though. Some people don't want to accept that they were rejected not because their numbers are too high, but because they suck.
- JamMasterJ
- Posts: 6649
- Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 7:17 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Yeah, I didn't mean that the rest of the T13 YPs to a great extent, but that the T6 almost definitely don't.Bildungsroman wrote:The occurrence of yield-protect in the T13 has been grossly overstated anyway. Literally the only T13 school I've seen demonstrating anything that looks like YP is UVA. But people still claim YP to pad their egos.JamMasterJ wrote:they all do. IDK why Chicago would since YP isn't an issue for the T6kitkat450 wrote:Anyone know why Chicago asks what other schools you are applying to. Is there any reason not to answer this?
Also:
that's messed upBildungsroman wrote: http://american.lawschoolnumbers.com/stats/0910/ ).
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 232
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2010 2:17 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
The weirdest thing about that level of yield protection is it seems like you're dooming your medians to never increase, so you're knocking yourself out of any competition in the rankins...in which case, why yield protect?
- Hopefully2012
- Posts: 464
- Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2011 5:22 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
They must have a bean counter who figured out that their medians wouldn't move much anyways so they're trying to regulate the admitted/matriculate rate to claim the rankings that way (the law school's % admitted out of the total applicants is also factored into a law school's ranking).Nobody wrote:The weirdest thing about that level of yield protection is it seems like you're dooming your medians to never increase, so you're knocking yourself out of any competition in the rankins...in which case, why yield protect?
They are not giving up on climbing the rankings.
-
- Posts: 70
- Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2011 2:43 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Do you guys know how to change Chicago RD application to an ED one. I could not find where to change it on LSAC website... Does that mean once I initiate an RD app, I cannot change?
-
- Posts: 386
- Joined: Tue May 31, 2011 8:08 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
You can't change it on LSAC once you start, but I think you can email the AdComm and they'll give you a form to fill out, sign, and fax over.jasonxu89 wrote:Do you guys know how to change Chicago RD application to an ED one. I could not find where to change it on LSAC website... Does that mean once I initiate an RD app, I cannot change?
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login