
Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle) Forum
- curiouscat
- Posts: 315
- Joined: Wed May 04, 2011 9:57 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Hmm... from the sounds of that, she's only starting to look at most of the applications. We might have a bit of a wait ahead of us. Hope I'm wrong. 

- soj
- Posts: 7888
- Joined: Sat Jan 16, 2010 11:10 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Maybe she makes acceptance calls on the off-days after reading marathons!
- Tom in Ohio
- Posts: 45
- Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2011 5:38 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Thanks for posting the blog entry. This is really what I'm banking on. I'm right at the median with my LSAT and my GPA sits at the 25th percentile. I have twenty years work experience, though, and I really tried to put together a coherent theme throughout my application. Numbers-wise, I'm a long shot, but maybe (fingers crossed) the totality of my application will be enough for her to slide my application into the "accept" pile.spek wrote:New blog post! Nothing about when decisions will start coming though.
http://blogs.law.stanford.edu/admissions/
-
- Posts: 379
- Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2011 3:53 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Anyone else think we'll start seeing decisions today? Looks like they admitted a bunch of people on 12/8 last year, but didn't begin rejections until after the new year.
-
- Posts: 178
- Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 1:10 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I'd guess today or tomorrow, but that's cause I'm impatient for something to come out from Stanford, even if it's good news for someone else.splbagel wrote:Anyone else think we'll start seeing decisions today? Looks like they admitted a bunch of people on 12/8 last year, but didn't begin rejections until after the new year.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 952
- Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2011 7:54 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Crap I hadn't even thought of Stanford AT ALL since I turned in my apptamereth wrote:I'd guess today or tomorrow, but that's cause I'm impatient for something to come out from Stanford, even if it's good news for someone else.splbagel wrote:Anyone else think we'll start seeing decisions today? Looks like they admitted a bunch of people on 12/8 last year, but didn't begin rejections until after the new year.

-
- Posts: 76
- Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2011 9:37 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
My status checker says that my LSAT is missing. Which is weird since I definitely have an LSAT score and haven't run into this problem at any other school.
Did this happen to anyone else? I will call in the morning but would like some reassurance in the meantime.
Did this happen to anyone else? I will call in the morning but would like some reassurance in the meantime.
-
- Posts: 58
- Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2010 7:55 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Check out my comment/FD's response on her last blog post: --LinkRemoved--
Synopsis: she's going to start making calls this week.
Synopsis: she's going to start making calls this week.
-
- Posts: 301
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2011 12:23 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
And so it begins...txl wrote:Check out my comment/FD's response on her last blog post: --LinkRemoved--
Synopsis: she's going to start making calls this week.
- soj
- Posts: 7888
- Joined: Sat Jan 16, 2010 11:10 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Good catch. I usually turn my phone on silent after 6pm EST, but now I'll have to leave the ringer on till later.txl wrote:Check out my comment/FD's response on her last blog post: --LinkRemoved--
Synopsis: she's going to start making calls this week.

- vincanity1
- Posts: 544
- Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 1:40 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Oh, what I would give to spend the next 3 years of my life in Palo Alto...please call me, Mrs. Deal :>
-
- Posts: 385
- Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2010 4:40 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Thanks for asking! I was debating doing so myselftxl wrote:Check out my comment/FD's response on her last blog post: --LinkRemoved--
Synopsis: she's going to start making calls this week.

-
- Posts: 178
- Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 1:10 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
+1spek wrote:Thanks for asking! I was debating doing so myselftxl wrote:Check out my comment/FD's response on her last blog post: --LinkRemoved--
Synopsis: she's going to start making calls this week.. It's nice to know that people will start hearing soon (hope we'll be among those people!)
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- AmandaPB
- Posts: 430
- Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2011 1:37 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Thanks! So. Excited.txl wrote:Check out my comment/FD's response on her last blog post: --LinkRemoved--
Synopsis: she's going to start making calls this week.
-
- Posts: 291
- Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2011 1:06 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
So we know it is this week, any guesses on which day? Approx. how many will hear back? Their UR dates?
I feel like we're at a sports game, and if we make enough noise on this thread, Dean Deal will shoot us an acceptance via t-shirt gun.
I feel like we're at a sports game, and if we make enough noise on this thread, Dean Deal will shoot us an acceptance via t-shirt gun.
-
- Posts: 379
- Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2011 3:53 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I say it starts tomorrow. If it's anything like last year, only September / early October submitters will hear before the new year, and those of us who submitted in late Oct / early Nov won't hear until February / March.
- amc987
- Posts: 568
- Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2009 10:58 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I think on LSN there were a few people who submitted in November who were accepted on 12/16, so I don't think that's outside the realm of possibility for this year. http://stanford.lawschoolnumbers.com/ap ... r=desc&p=2 Although Dean Deal's recent blog post makes me doubt whether she's gotten through many applications at all, so you could be right. I'm guessing Thursday and Friday will be the first round of calls. I'm not sure if SLS's admissions office is in next week or not...splbagel wrote:I say it starts tomorrow. If it's anything like last year, only September / early October submitters will hear before the new year, and those of us who submitted in late Oct / early Nov won't hear until February / March.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 178
- Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 1:10 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Sorted by submit date to view when relative decision dates were. The number of rejections/waitlists is incredibly depressing.amc987 wrote:I think on LSN there were a few people who submitted in November who were accepted on 12/16, so I don't think that's outside the realm of possibility for this year. http://stanford.lawschoolnumbers.com/ap ... r=desc&p=2 Although Dean Deal's recent blog post makes me doubt whether she's gotten through many applications at all, so you could be right. I'm guessing Thursday and Friday will be the first round of calls. I'm not sure if SLS's admissions office is in next week or not...splbagel wrote:I say it starts tomorrow. If it's anything like last year, only September / early October submitters will hear before the new year, and those of us who submitted in late Oct / early Nov won't hear until February / March.
Edit: To be fair, a lot of the rejections are ones with low numbers.
-
- Posts: 379
- Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2011 3:53 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
...and lots of them plenty higher than mine!tamereth wrote:Sorted by submit date to view when relative decision dates were. The number of rejections/waitlists is incredibly depressing.amc987 wrote:I think on LSN there were a few people who submitted in November who were accepted on 12/16, so I don't think that's outside the realm of possibility for this year. http://stanford.lawschoolnumbers.com/ap ... r=desc&p=2 Although Dean Deal's recent blog post makes me doubt whether she's gotten through many applications at all, so you could be right. I'm guessing Thursday and Friday will be the first round of calls. I'm not sure if SLS's admissions office is in next week or not...splbagel wrote:I say it starts tomorrow. If it's anything like last year, only September / early October submitters will hear before the new year, and those of us who submitted in late Oct / early Nov won't hear until February / March.
Edit: To be fair, a lot of the rejections are ones with low numbers.

-
- Posts: 178
- Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 1:10 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Then there's the 3.9+/170+s that were waitlisted/rejected.... I wish I knew why. Stanford admissions seems like such a mysterysplbagel wrote:...and lots of them plenty higher than mine!tamereth wrote:Sorted by submit date to view when relative decision dates were. The number of rejections/waitlists is incredibly depressing.amc987 wrote:I think on LSN there were a few people who submitted in November who were accepted on 12/16, so I don't think that's outside the realm of possibility for this year. http://stanford.lawschoolnumbers.com/ap ... r=desc&p=2 Although Dean Deal's recent blog post makes me doubt whether she's gotten through many applications at all, so you could be right. I'm guessing Thursday and Friday will be the first round of calls. I'm not sure if SLS's admissions office is in next week or not...splbagel wrote:I say it starts tomorrow. If it's anything like last year, only September / early October submitters will hear before the new year, and those of us who submitted in late Oct / early Nov won't hear until February / March.
Edit: To be fair, a lot of the rejections are ones with low numbers.

- MissElphaba
- Posts: 58
- Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2011 10:59 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Finally submitted for review today. I'm not going to hear back for months
Darn my dean for taking weeks with that form...

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- wendys27
- Posts: 76
- Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2011 6:26 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Not hearing for a while either. I submitted my application on 11/7. Gave my Dean's form in on 10/31. Went submitted for review on 12/7. Could not understand why it took so long for them to fill out the formMissElphaba wrote:Finally submitted for review today. I'm not going to hear back for monthsDarn my dean for taking weeks with that form...
-
- Posts: 479
- Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2011 11:01 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Man, I knew Stanford is sort of a GPA queen, but according to LSN, only 5 people were admitted last year with < 3.8
I should probably have just saved the $116
I should probably have just saved the $116

-
- Posts: 952
- Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2011 7:54 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I think in general, every person on LSN = about 10 admits (judging from Harvard, which had about 80-90 profiles on LSN last year). That means there are at least 50 people with <3.8...which of course is true according to the definition of the medians.addy11 wrote:Man, I knew Stanford is sort of a GPA queen, but according to LSN, only 5 people were admitted last year with < 3.8
I should probably have just saved the $116
Fret not!
-
- Posts: 379
- Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2011 3:53 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Two things to keep in mind:
--LSN isn't necessarily a representative sample of applicants.
--Of the 8 <3.8 admits on LSN last year, 5 were URM.
--LSN isn't necessarily a representative sample of applicants.
--Of the 8 <3.8 admits on LSN last year, 5 were URM.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login