They're serious about this btw. I know someone who called and asked if he could submit an update and they flat out told him no.UChicago wrote:After your online status checker indicates that your application is "complete", you may no longer submit any additional materials for your file unless (1) the Admissions Committee requests additional materials, (2) your update pertains to the Character and Fitness sections of the application, or (3) your update is necessary to ensure that the information you have provided in your application remains truthful and complete.
Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013) Forum
- Crowing
- Posts: 2631
- Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:20 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
- LSATSCORES2012
- Posts: 770
- Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2012 2:12 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I wonder if this includes GPA updates - do they just ignore them?Crowing wrote:They're serious about this btw. I know someone who called and asked if he could submit an update and they flat out told him no.UChicago wrote:After your online status checker indicates that your application is "complete", you may no longer submit any additional materials for your file unless (1) the Admissions Committee requests additional materials, (2) your update pertains to the Character and Fitness sections of the application, or (3) your update is necessary to ensure that the information you have provided in your application remains truthful and complete.
- 02889
- Posts: 479
- Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2011 12:21 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
No, I think updated GPA and LSAT are looked at favorably. I think they mean updates like I had intended, when I realized after submitting that I ignored their resume format instructions and planned to send a correct one.LSATSCORES2012 wrote:I wonder if this includes GPA updates - do they just ignore them?Crowing wrote:They're serious about this btw. I know someone who called and asked if he could submit an update and they flat out told him no.UChicago wrote:After your online status checker indicates that your application is "complete", you may no longer submit any additional materials for your file unless (1) the Admissions Committee requests additional materials, (2) your update pertains to the Character and Fitness sections of the application, or (3) your update is necessary to ensure that the information you have provided in your application remains truthful and complete.
- LSATSCORES2012
- Posts: 770
- Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2012 2:12 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Oh, okay, thanks.02889 wrote:No, I think updated GPA and LSAT are looked at favorably. I think they mean updates like I had intended, when I realized after submitting that I ignored their resume format instructions and planned to send a correct one.LSATSCORES2012 wrote:I wonder if this includes GPA updates - do they just ignore them?Crowing wrote:They're serious about this btw. I know someone who called and asked if he could submit an update and they flat out told him no.UChicago wrote:After your online status checker indicates that your application is "complete", you may no longer submit any additional materials for your file unless (1) the Admissions Committee requests additional materials, (2) your update pertains to the Character and Fitness sections of the application, or (3) your update is necessary to ensure that the information you have provided in your application remains truthful and complete.
FYI, I missed the part about including the hours worked on your resume, I'm below both medians, and I've been invited to interview... so it can't hurt too much I guess.
- Mr. Elshal
- Posts: 611
- Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2012 11:30 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I missed that too and I'm interviewing tomorrowLSATSCORES2012 wrote:Oh, okay, thanks.02889 wrote:No, I think updated GPA and LSAT are looked at favorably. I think they mean updates like I had intended, when I realized after submitting that I ignored their resume format instructions and planned to send a correct one.LSATSCORES2012 wrote:I wonder if this includes GPA updates - do they just ignore them?Crowing wrote:
They're serious about this btw. I know someone who called and asked if he could submit an update and they flat out told him no.
FYI, I missed the part about including the hours worked on your resume, I'm below both medians, and I've been invited to interview... so it can't hurt too much I guess.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 530
- Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2012 2:54 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Whether they want the update depends on the situation. While on the phone with the office, I explained specifically what non-gpa non-lsat update I wanted to provide, and they said they wanted it.
-
- Posts: 3070
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 12:17 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
.
Last edited by 20141023 on Mon Feb 16, 2015 3:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- LSATSCORES2012
- Posts: 770
- Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2012 2:12 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Regulus wrote:I included the hours on my resume.... that is probably the one redeeming factor that compensated for my otherwise lacking application. You might even call it a "soft."Mr. Elshal wrote:I missed that too and I'm interviewing tomorrowLSATSCORES2012 wrote:Oh, okay, thanks.
FYI, I missed the part about including the hours worked on your resume, I'm below both medians, and I've been invited to interview... so it can't hurt too much I guess.

- Crowing
- Posts: 2631
- Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:20 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I didn't put hours worked and skipped probably every optional question 

- HankBashir
- Posts: 536
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2013 3:01 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
+1Crowing wrote:I didn't put hours worked and skipped probably every optional question
- twinkletoes16
- Posts: 1317
- Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2012 11:14 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Crowing wrote:I didn't put hours worked and skipped probably every optional question
I did EVERYTHING minus the "tell us what other schools you're applying to" and I've heard nothing. I wish there was a "thumbs down" emoticon on TLS
- Crowing
- Posts: 2631
- Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:20 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
im sure youll be fine. im pretty sure they havent gotten to december submits yet.twinkletoes16 wrote:Crowing wrote:I didn't put hours worked and skipped probably every optional question
I did EVERYTHING minus the "tell us what other schools you're applying to" and I've heard nothing. I wish there was a "thumbs down" emoticon on TLS
- twinkletoes16
- Posts: 1317
- Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2012 11:14 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Crowing wrote:im sure youll be fine. im pretty sure they havent gotten to december submits yet.twinkletoes16 wrote:Crowing wrote:I didn't put hours worked and skipped probably every optional question
I did EVERYTHING minus the "tell us what other schools you're applying to" and I've heard nothing. I wish there was a "thumbs down" emoticon on TLS
damn, really? they're slow
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Crowing
- Posts: 2631
- Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:20 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
process seems to be ur -> interview invite -> interview -> back to ur -> decision
last i saw they were still inviting late oct submits to interview
last i saw they were still inviting late oct submits to interview
- JXander
- Posts: 966
- Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2012 10:23 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
How is this pertinent to whether one is admitted or not? Just curious.twinkletoes16 wrote:I did EVERYTHING minus the "tell us what other schools you're applying to" and I've heard nothing.
- twinkletoes16
- Posts: 1317
- Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2012 11:14 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
JXander wrote:How is this pertinent to whether one is admitted or not? Just curious.twinkletoes16 wrote:I did EVERYTHING minus the "tell us what other schools you're applying to" and I've heard nothing.
It's not; we're just speculating and grasping for patterns that aren't there.
- JXander
- Posts: 966
- Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2012 10:23 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Ah. What else is new?twinkletoes16 wrote:JXander wrote:How is this pertinent to whether one is admitted or not? Just curious.twinkletoes16 wrote:I did EVERYTHING minus the "tell us what other schools you're applying to" and I've heard nothing.
It's not; we're just speculating and grasping for patterns that aren't there.

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- UtilityMonster
- Posts: 315
- Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2011 3:16 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
How does Chicago typically communicate scholarship info to applicants? After getting shafted from Columbia today I am looking to Chicago for $$$.
- 2014
- Posts: 6028
- Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 3:53 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
By email in March I want to say, but it could be February.UtilityMonster wrote:How does Chicago typically communicate scholarship info to applicants? After getting shafted from Columbia today I am looking to Chicago for $$$.
-
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 1:28 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
how long did it take for people to get their decisions after the interviews?
- Crowing
- Posts: 2631
- Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:20 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
well there has only been one decision day so far, 1/23. i interviewed on 1/12, but some of the 1/23 admits interviewed back in december.oneshot_90 wrote:how long did it take for people to get their decisions after the interviews?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- elterrible78
- Posts: 1120
- Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2012 3:09 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Hey guys.
Some of you may have seen some stats-based stuff I have been posting in other forums. I have been working a lot on it, trying to kill time while application decisions trickle in. Most of the stuff I did over the last couple days was based on the last cycle, or the last two cycles. I've started to put together individual school analysis based on ALL the available data on LSN now, so I'll post them to the corresponding school's threads. This would probably have been more useful/interesting for people a few months ago, but what the heck.

This table is based on logistical regression analysis of data from Law School Numbers. It includes all accepted and rejected applicants from the 2003/4 cycle up until the present (2012/2013) cycle. It does not include waitlisted applicants (unless they indicated that they had been ultimately accepted or rejected). Please keep in mind the nature of the data when interpreting these results.
Also, keep in mind that this analysis is based only on the outcomes for the indicated school’s applicant pool compared to each other, and does not necessarily mean that “numbers aren’t important” to any particular school.
Eventually, once I've slogged through everything, I'll compile lists and, where they'd be helpful, charts comparing data across schools. I'm no stats expert, but I picked up some stuff in grad school, and I enjoy it.
Some of you may have seen some stats-based stuff I have been posting in other forums. I have been working a lot on it, trying to kill time while application decisions trickle in. Most of the stuff I did over the last couple days was based on the last cycle, or the last two cycles. I've started to put together individual school analysis based on ALL the available data on LSN now, so I'll post them to the corresponding school's threads. This would probably have been more useful/interesting for people a few months ago, but what the heck.

This table is based on logistical regression analysis of data from Law School Numbers. It includes all accepted and rejected applicants from the 2003/4 cycle up until the present (2012/2013) cycle. It does not include waitlisted applicants (unless they indicated that they had been ultimately accepted or rejected). Please keep in mind the nature of the data when interpreting these results.
Also, keep in mind that this analysis is based only on the outcomes for the indicated school’s applicant pool compared to each other, and does not necessarily mean that “numbers aren’t important” to any particular school.
Eventually, once I've slogged through everything, I'll compile lists and, where they'd be helpful, charts comparing data across schools. I'm no stats expert, but I picked up some stuff in grad school, and I enjoy it.
Last edited by elterrible78 on Tue Jan 29, 2013 5:23 am, edited 1 time in total.
- jselson
- Posts: 6337
- Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2013 3:51 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I know it'll take months for them to get to my app, but expecting a WL: no "Why Chicago," nothing Chicago specific in PS, no ties, and I put that I was applying to all the T14 in the box.
-
- Posts: 3070
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 12:17 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
.
Last edited by 20141023 on Mon Feb 16, 2015 3:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- reallysearch
- Posts: 106
- Joined: Sat Jun 23, 2012 1:57 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Thanks elterrible78, I love people who run logistic regression to kill time (because I am one of them!)elterrible78 wrote:Hey guys.
I have been working a lot on it, trying to kill time while application decisions trickle in.
This table is based on logistical regression analysis of data from Law School Numbers.

Just to share some of my results (I only used data from last cycle, and fitted a simple logit model with 2 variables, LSAT and GPA)


vertical axis represents probability of being accepted
conclusion: high GPA will boost your chance at Chicago, whereas high LSAT may be more useful in schools like NYU
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login