Page 1 of 1
Lower T14 -> Harvard (Rank?)
Posted: Sun Mar 13, 2016 6:24 pm
by Anonymous User
Any idea what GPA/Rank = >50% chance at H?
Also, do 1L SAs at competitive firms (top firm in non-NY Major Market) increase your chance or are they irrelevant from a transfer perspective?
Re: Lower T14 -> Harvard (Rank?)
Posted: Mon Mar 14, 2016 2:03 am
by lavarman84
Hard to say for sure but I'd say top 15%, you're looking at an above 50% chance. Top 10%, you're in.
Re: Lower T14 -> Harvard (Rank?)
Posted: Mon Mar 14, 2016 10:55 am
by Nebby
lawman84 wrote:Hard to say for sure but I'd say top 15%, you're looking at an above 50% chance. Top 10%, you're in.
Probably top 10% for a >50% chance. HLS gets lots of applicants from the lower-T14.
Re: Lower T14 -> Harvard (Rank?)
Posted: Mon Mar 14, 2016 10:56 am
by Nebby
Anonymous User wrote:Also, do 1L SAs at competitive firms (top firm in non-NY Major Market) increase your chance or are they irrelevant from a transfer perspective?
This will give you a boost in exactly zero situations. Not even during 2L OCI will your screener care too much about it, let alone a law school who has no reason to accept you but for dat tuition $$$
Re: Lower T14 -> Harvard (Rank?)
Posted: Mon Mar 14, 2016 6:47 pm
by Anonymous User
Nebby wrote:Anonymous User wrote:Also, do 1L SAs at competitive firms (top firm in non-NY Major Market) increase your chance or are they irrelevant from a transfer perspective?
This will give you a boost in exactly zero situations. Not even during 2L OCI will your screener care too much about it, let alone a law school who has no reason to accept you but for dat tuition $$$
That's strange. I assumed that in accepting transfer students, law schools care about what your future prospects are and how you will reflect on the school in the future. Since someone with a non-diversity 1L SA at a top firm in a major market is essentially a shoe-in for BigLaw, law schools would be more inclined to accept him since they will have an almost guaranteed placement at a top firm in a major market. From a transfer perspective, #1 at X school who doesn't get BigLaw is worst than #50 at X school who does.
Re: Lower T14 -> Harvard (Rank?)
Posted: Mon Mar 14, 2016 7:05 pm
by Nebby
Anonymous User wrote:Nebby wrote:Anonymous User wrote:Also, do 1L SAs at competitive firms (top firm in non-NY Major Market) increase your chance or are they irrelevant from a transfer perspective?
This will give you a boost in exactly zero situations. Not even during 2L OCI will your screener care too much about it, let alone a law school who has no reason to accept you but for dat tuition $$$
That's strange. I assumed that in accepting transfer students, law schools care about what your future prospects are and how you will reflect on the school in the future. Since someone with a non-diversity 1L SA at a top firm in a major market is essentially a shoe-in for BigLaw, law schools would be more inclined to accept him since they will have an almost guaranteed placement at a top firm in a major market. From a transfer perspective, #1 at X school who doesn't get BigLaw is worst than #50 at X school who does.
You assumed incorrectly
Re: Lower T14 -> Harvard (Rank?)
Posted: Mon Mar 14, 2016 7:14 pm
by Anonymous User
Nebby wrote:Anonymous User wrote:Nebby wrote:Anonymous User wrote:Also, do 1L SAs at competitive firms (top firm in non-NY Major Market) increase your chance or are they irrelevant from a transfer perspective?
This will give you a boost in exactly zero situations. Not even during 2L OCI will your screener care too much about it, let alone a law school who has no reason to accept you but for dat tuition $$$
That's strange. I assumed that in accepting transfer students, law schools care about what your future prospects are and how you will reflect on the school in the future. Since someone with a non-diversity 1L SA at a top firm in a major market is essentially a shoe-in for BigLaw, law schools would be more inclined to accept him since they will have an almost guaranteed placement at a top firm in a major market. From a transfer perspective, #1 at X school who doesn't get BigLaw is worst than #50 at X school who does.
You assumed incorrectly
What exactly do they care about then? I can't imagine it being grades since they are irrelevant from a ranking perspective... As for money, all transfers pay the same thing (unless they get need-based aid, which I won't). There has to be some objective
Re: Lower T14 -> Harvard (Rank?)
Posted: Mon Mar 14, 2016 7:26 pm
by Nebby
They care about a candidates ability to compete in coursework, contribute a unique perspective, and make the law school community a more well-rounded place. These things are gleaned through 1L grades, unique experiences on a resume, and the personal statement. A law firm is the least unique thing you can have when you're applying to a place like HLS, who literally hundreds of students pursuing the same path already.
Re: Lower T14 -> Harvard (Rank?)
Posted: Mon Mar 14, 2016 7:30 pm
by Anonymous User
Nebby wrote:They care about a candidates ability to compete in coursework, contribute a unique perspective, and make the law school community a more well-rounded place. These things are gleaned through 1L grades, unique experiences on a resume, and the personal statement. A law firm is the least unique thing you can have when you're applying to a place like HLS, who literally hundreds of students pursuing the same path already.
Thanks for all the insight! I really appreciate it!