NY Firms No-Offering Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2018 2:13 pm
Re: NY Firms No-Offering
Back to K&E. At a minimum, I don’t buy the post about the affirmative action comment - there’s got to be only 1 or 2 black partners at K&E NY, if that.
Last edited by cavalier1138 on Sat Jul 23, 2022 1:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Outed for anon abuse.
Reason: Outed for anon abuse.
-
- Posts: 432633
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NY Firms No-Offering
Associate here. I could definitely imagine a degree of casual friendship that is inappropriate, but making friends with the partners in a professional “work friend” way is not only acceptable, but desirable. I have an excellent reputation with most of the partners in my office, including many that I’ve never worked with. I credit this in part to befriending them all socially (the other part is doing good quality work for the partners I do actually work with, which the other partners eventually hear about). This has afforded me a bunch of opportunities so far and I’m definitely treated as a “favorite” even by people I’ve never worked for directly.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Fri Jul 22, 2022 2:00 pmA few things that I've seen -Anonymous User wrote: ↑Fri Jul 22, 2022 1:36 pmWhat are some examples of cluelessness about professional norms y'all are seeing? Not talking about racist, sexist etc. types of egregious comments and behavior.
Treating partners like they are friends. TBF, partners foster this but hoo boy they are in for a rude awakening once they start as associates.
When the partnership vote happens eventually, obviously the economic case comes first (including circumstance of the market and your practice at that time). But it is also largely a popularity contest, and as long as the key partners in your specific group support your case economically, it’s easy to get all the other partners on board if you’ve spent a decade making friends with them.
-
- Posts: 276
- Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2019 12:34 pm
Re: NY Firms No-Offering
I'm guessing what they meant was being "too" friendly or casual with the partners. As a summer, you have to understand the power balance and that partners are often being extra friendly because they're equally trying to sell you on the firm so you come back and work for them in a year. SAs that assume they are actually friends with certain partners after a couple social functions and then making jokes that are actually insults (and that would be totally appropriate with your close friends) are not appropriate to a partner who you haven't known very long. Senior associates that have worked for these partners closely for 5+ years may be able to get away with this because they are probably actually friends and when you're in the trenches with people long enough some light hearted ribbing can occur in both directions but it feels uncomfortable watching SAs be too chummy with seniors and partners when you can see those people are clearly just laughing along to not make it even more awkward.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Sat Jul 23, 2022 1:28 pmAssociate here. I could definitely imagine a degree of casual friendship that is inappropriate, but making friends with the partners in a professional “work friend” way is not only acceptable, but desirable. I have an excellent reputation with most of the partners in my office, including many that I’ve never worked with. I credit this in part to befriending them all socially (the other part is doing good quality work for the partners I do actually work with, which the other partners eventually hear about). This has afforded me a bunch of opportunities so far and I’m definitely treated as a “favorite” even by people I’ve never worked for directly.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Fri Jul 22, 2022 2:00 pmA few things that I've seen -Anonymous User wrote: ↑Fri Jul 22, 2022 1:36 pmWhat are some examples of cluelessness about professional norms y'all are seeing? Not talking about racist, sexist etc. types of egregious comments and behavior.
Treating partners like they are friends. TBF, partners foster this but hoo boy they are in for a rude awakening once they start as associates.
When the partnership vote happens eventually, obviously the economic case comes first (including circumstance of the market and your practice at that time). But it is also largely a popularity contest, and as long as the key partners in your specific group support your case economically, it’s easy to get all the other partners on board if you’ve spent a decade making friends with them.
-
- Posts: 432633
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NY Firms No-Offering
Were these just rumors then?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 432633
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NY Firms No-Offering
I think so. Everyone in the chicago office received offers today during a reception. No one has heard about these NY cold offers outside of from tls.
Master troll, whoever started this rumor.
-
- Posts: 432633
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NY Firms No-Offering
Someone posted about this earlier in the thread, but one KE NY summer did get fired during the last week (rather than no-offered) for celebrating Dobbs openly and harassing personal assistants. KE fired him so they could still report 100% return offers.
-
- Posts: 432633
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NY Firms No-Offering
Reportedly from K&E the summer prancing around about Dobbs was fired and there is a note at the security desk to not let them in
-
- Posts: 489
- Joined: Thu Aug 08, 2019 7:07 pm
Re: NY Firms No-Offering
Is it confirmed that he pranced? Was there clearly a vertical, bouncy movement atypical to a normal gait?Anonymous User wrote: ↑Fri Jul 29, 2022 11:28 amReportedly from K&E the summer prancing around about Dobbs was fired and there is a note at the security desk to not let them in
-
- Posts: 432633
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NY Firms No-Offering
Anyone know which schools this Dobbs guys was from.
- Wild Card
- Posts: 1014
- Joined: Fri Jan 17, 2014 6:48 pm
Re: NY Firms No-Offering
It is my understanding based on my personal knowedge or lack thereof, that the Dobbs bro was promoted to full share partner--not even fake partner.
-
- Posts: 432633
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
-
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Sun Aug 24, 2014 2:12 pm
Re: NY Firms No-Offering
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=eCLp7zodUiIRes Ipsa Loquitter wrote: ↑Fri Jul 29, 2022 12:01 pmIs it confirmed that he pranced? Was there clearly a vertical, bouncy movement atypical to a normal gait?Anonymous User wrote: ↑Fri Jul 29, 2022 11:28 amReportedly from K&E the summer prancing around about Dobbs was fired and there is a note at the security desk to not let them in
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 432633
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NY Firms No-Offering
Confirmed. I saw a picture of the note (which I found very amusing).Anonymous User wrote: ↑Fri Jul 29, 2022 11:28 amReportedly from K&E the summer prancing around about Dobbs was fired and there is a note at the security desk to not let them in
-
- Posts: 432633
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NY Firms No-Offering
How is going to HYS relevant at all to this? Also it’s YSC anyways.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Fri Jul 22, 2022 2:21 pmThe thing is, college environments --and especially top colleges that most biglaw SA's went to-- are much more sensitive about this type of thing than many work environments. As someone who worked office jobs in Texas for many years, and then went to HYS much later in life (and recently), congratulating women about Dobbs and asking someone if they are a diversity hire is something that I would expect out of a Texas office much moreso than a top university campus. So I dont think the "i didnt know work culture thing" really tracks. Wearing sundresses or whatever, yeah i guess, but i think the young people just dont care rather than dont know.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Thu Jul 21, 2022 2:19 pmKids who never were in a normal work environment sometimes lack the awareness of what's not OK at work. Also the 100% offer rate + common online refrain that you need to sexually harass someone to lose your offer has I think shifted the way people act. Maybe this will make me sound like a boomer but I've seen a lot of summers behave inappropriately for a work environment. I guess they'll eventually grow up and once the workload hits they won't have time to act up. But maybe scaring summers isn't so bad.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Thu Jul 21, 2022 2:08 pmI always wonder how people like this managed to make it through college and a (presumably) good law school without realizing how bad this activity isAnonymous User wrote: ↑Thu Jul 21, 2022 1:48 pm
One of them went around saying congratulations to female SA's post Dobbs and the other asked a black share partner if he was a diversity hire.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login