Tulane vs. Richmond vs. George Mason Forum
- TheFailboat
- Posts: 76
- Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2012 2:46 pm
Tulane vs. Richmond vs. George Mason
I got into Tulane with a $25k scholarship and Richmond with a $20k scholarship. Richmond's tuition is cheaper than Tulane's ($32,450 vs. $43,684), but Tulane seems to have a broader alumni network and better job placement. Plus, they're ranked higher, though apparently that doesn't make much difference out of the T14. I also got into George Mason with in-state tuition (around the range of $24,000), but the high COL in the DC area worries me--plus, there's the competitive pecking order in DC.
I don't intend on staying in Richmond in the long run, and that's where Richmond seems to do most of their placement - should I spring for Tulane, suck it up and take the better deal in Richmond, or battle it out on DC?
I don't intend on staying in Richmond in the long run, and that's where Richmond seems to do most of their placement - should I spring for Tulane, suck it up and take the better deal in Richmond, or battle it out on DC?
- TheFailboat
- Posts: 76
- Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2012 2:46 pm
Re: Tulane vs. Richmond vs. George Mason
I guess I should also mention that I plan on focusing on intellectual property, just in case that makes a difference.
- Doorkeeper
- Posts: 4869
- Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2012 11:25 pm
Re: Tulane vs. Richmond vs. George Mason
None of these are very good options, but all things considered Tulane seems the best option. Are you ok with living in the deep South after finishing? Also, try to negotiate with Tulane if at all possible.
-
- Posts: 105
- Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2011 1:45 pm
Re: Tulane vs. Richmond vs. George Mason
I voted for Tulane, as it seems to be your best option. DC market is extremely competitive, and there is no reason to attend UR unless you'd want to stay in Richmond.
- TheFailboat
- Posts: 76
- Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2012 2:46 pm
Re: Tulane vs. Richmond vs. George Mason
Unfortunately they're the best I can do with my stats, I think. I actually hope to live further South than VA in the long run. The bad thing is that Tulane states pretty clearly that they don't budge with scholarships (though I'm not sure what they actually do when it comes down to it). I also got into Brooklyn Law with $$ and I'm waiting to hear back from Cardozo, but I've basically ruled out NYC (too much competition for where I'd be, too expensive, etc.)Doorkeeper wrote:None of these are very good options, but all things considered Tulane seems the best option. Are you ok with living in the deep South after finishing? Also, try to negotiate with Tulane if at all possible.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 105
- Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2011 1:45 pm
Re: Tulane vs. Richmond vs. George Mason
You should have applied to Wake and UGA.
-
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2012 6:14 pm
Re: Tulane vs. Richmond vs. George Mason
I vote Tulane if you're ok staying in that general area when you graduate. Tulane is the better law school in New Orleans so that helps with competition, cost of living is going to be lower than DC, and it's just a great city all around. Tulane also carries a good reputation in the surrounding states so that could allow for more job options after graduation.
If I had gotten in to Tulane, I would have gone without hesitation. Good luck!
If I had gotten in to Tulane, I would have gone without hesitation. Good luck!
- TheFailboat
- Posts: 76
- Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2012 2:46 pm
Re: Tulane vs. Richmond vs. George Mason
Thanks! Do you happen to know if they budge with scholarships at all? I know they say it's non-negotiable, but you never know...MsWoo401 wrote:I vote Tulane if you're ok staying in that general area when you graduate. Tulane is the better law school in New Orleans so that helps with competition, cost of living is going to be lower than DC, and it's just a great city all around. Tulane also carries a good reputation in the surrounding states so that could allow for more job options after graduation.
If I had gotten in to Tulane, I would have gone without hesitation. Good luck!
- abbottsbar
- Posts: 191
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2011 12:43 pm
Re: Tulane vs. Richmond vs. George Mason
Don't know if it makes a difference, but Richmond went up to $36,850 for next year (just got my seat deposit form). Also, if you're not planning on staying in the Richmond area, I'd be leaning towards Tulane. As far as GMU goes, I'm wary. You're definitely competing with GW and GULC in the DC market.TheFailboat wrote:I got into Tulane with a $25k scholarship and Richmond with a $20k scholarship. Richmond's tuition is cheaper than Tulane's ($32,450 vs. $43,684), but Tulane seems to have a broader alumni network and better job placement. Plus, they're ranked higher, though apparently that doesn't make much difference out of the T14. I also got into George Mason with in-state tuition (around the range of $24,000), but the high COL in the DC area worries me--plus, there's the competitive pecking order in DC.
I don't intend on staying in Richmond in the long run, and that's where Richmond seems to do most of their placement - should I spring for Tulane, suck it up and take the better deal in Richmond, or battle it out on DC?
-
- Posts: 655
- Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2011 1:15 am
Re: Tulane vs. Richmond vs. George Mason
And Yale, Harvard, Columbia, Chicago, etc.abbottsbar wrote:You're definitely competing with GW and GULC in the DC market.
- abbottsbar
- Posts: 191
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2011 12:43 pm
Re: Tulane vs. Richmond vs. George Mason
TITCR. All things considered, if I were in your shoes I'd be gearing up for Bourbon Street.tennisking88 wrote:And Yale, Harvard, Columbia, Chicago, etc.abbottsbar wrote:You're definitely competing with GW and GULC in the DC market.
- romothesavior
- Posts: 14692
- Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 4:29 pm
Re: Tulane vs. Richmond vs. George Mason
None of these are all that great, but Tulane is clearly better than the other two.
Do you have an engineering/hard sciences background?
Do you have an engineering/hard sciences background?
- TheFailboat
- Posts: 76
- Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2012 2:46 pm
Re: Tulane vs. Richmond vs. George Mason
I have a weird background - I was an Art History major with a computer science minor. I have some freelance experience with web stuff, but far more experience in the arts and media world, so I was planning on focusing on copyrights and trademarks. However, I've heard pretty much everywhere that patents are where all the IP law jobs are nowadays. Now I'm kind of considering deferring law school and going back for a B.S. in science things.romothesavior wrote:None of these are all that great, but Tulane is clearly better than the other two.
Do you have an engineering/hard sciences background?
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- romothesavior
- Posts: 14692
- Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 4:29 pm
Re: Tulane vs. Richmond vs. George Mason
I think deferring law school is probably a good move. You don't even necessarily have to go back to school, but you could work and study for the LSAT. Or if you do go back for a more "hard sciencey" background, it could help for IP stuff. Law school will always be there, and it is a massive investment. You should do everything you can to set yourself up for success. Good luck OP.TheFailboat wrote:I have a weird background - I was an Art History major with a computer science minor. I have some freelance experience with web stuff, but far more experience in the arts and media world, so I was planning on focusing on copyrights and trademarks. However, I've heard pretty much everywhere that patents are where all the IP law jobs are nowadays. Now I'm kind of considering deferring law school and going back for a B.S. in science things.romothesavior wrote:None of these are all that great, but Tulane is clearly better than the other two.
Do you have an engineering/hard sciences background?
- TheFailboat
- Posts: 76
- Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2012 2:46 pm
Re: Tulane vs. Richmond vs. George Mason
Just out of curiosity - you seem to be against going to a regional school that's far away from the applicant's native region (obsessive TLS lurker...I have no life anymore). Do you still think Tulane is a better choice than Richmond? I'm a Virginian.romothesavior wrote:I think deferring law school is probably a good move. You don't even necessarily have to go back to school, but you could work and study for the LSAT. Or if you do go back for a more "hard sciencey" background, it could help for IP stuff. Law school will always be there, and it is a massive investment. You should do everything you can to set yourself up for success. Good luck OP.TheFailboat wrote:I have a weird background - I was an Art History major with a computer science minor. I have some freelance experience with web stuff, but far more experience in the arts and media world, so I was planning on focusing on copyrights and trademarks. However, I've heard pretty much everywhere that patents are where all the IP law jobs are nowadays. Now I'm kind of considering deferring law school and going back for a B.S. in science things.romothesavior wrote:None of these are all that great, but Tulane is clearly better than the other two.
Do you have an engineering/hard sciences background?
- romothesavior
- Posts: 14692
- Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 4:29 pm
Re: Tulane vs. Richmond vs. George Mason
In that case, I'd lean more towards Richmond. But again, I don't think either one is a good choice at that price, and I think you could put yourself in a better position for a successful career by waiting and looking elsewhere. What are your numbers?TheFailboat wrote:Just out of curiosity - you seem to be against going to a regional school that's far away from the applicant's native region (obsessive TLS lurker...I have no life anymore). Do you still think Tulane is a better choice than Richmond? I'm a Virginian.
ETA: Never mind, I just looked. Your numbers are solid, but a few more LSAT points (the 167-170 range) could honestly change your entire career and life. I can attest to that because it happened to me with a retake.
- abbottsbar
- Posts: 191
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2011 12:43 pm
Re: Tulane vs. Richmond vs. George Mason
"I'm Ron Burgandy??"romothesavior wrote:In that case, I'd lean more towards Richmond. But again, I don't think either one is a good choice at that price, and I think you could put yourself in a better position for a successful career by waiting and looking elsewhere. What are your numbers?TheFailboat wrote:Just out of curiosity - you seem to be against going to a regional school that's far away from the applicant's native region (obsessive TLS lurker...I have no life anymore). Do you still think Tulane is a better choice than Richmond? I'm a Virginian.
ETA: Never mind, I just looked. Your numbers are solid, but a few more LSAT points (the 167-170 range) could honestly change your entire career and life. I can attest to that because it happened to me with a retake.
I would agree with you in regards to Richmond, but OP has stated that they do not want to practice in Richmond after graduation and actually wants to venture south. It was with those paramaters in mind that I suggested Tulane over Richmond. If he/she wanted to stay in the Richmond region I would have suggeted staying close to home. .
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- TheFailboat
- Posts: 76
- Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2012 2:46 pm
Re: Tulane vs. Richmond vs. George Mason
"Danjaaa zooone."abbottsbar wrote:"I'm Ron Burgandy??"romothesavior wrote:In that case, I'd lean more towards Richmond. But again, I don't think either one is a good choice at that price, and I think you could put yourself in a better position for a successful career by waiting and looking elsewhere. What are your numbers?TheFailboat wrote:Just out of curiosity - you seem to be against going to a regional school that's far away from the applicant's native region (obsessive TLS lurker...I have no life anymore). Do you still think Tulane is a better choice than Richmond? I'm a Virginian.
ETA: Never mind, I just looked. Your numbers are solid, but a few more LSAT points (the 167-170 range) could honestly change your entire career and life. I can attest to that because it happened to me with a retake.
I would agree with you in regards to Richmond, but OP has stated that they do not want to practice in Richmond after graduation and actually wants to venture south. It was with those paramaters in mind that I suggested Tulane over Richmond. If he/she wanted to stay in the Richmond region I would have suggeted staying close to home. .
You're correct - I've been in Richmond for years and I'm hoping to move farther south. Maybe I should have applied to more places down south...
- Aberzombie1892
- Posts: 1908
- Joined: Sun Mar 29, 2009 10:56 am
Re: Tulane vs. Richmond vs. George Mason
Assuming you are going to law school in the fall, Tulane is indeed clearly the best option.
PM me if you have any questions about it.
PM me if you have any questions about it.
- TheFailboat
- Posts: 76
- Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2012 2:46 pm
Re: Tulane vs. Richmond vs. George Mason
PM'd!Aberzombie1892 wrote:Assuming you are going to law school in the fall, Tulane is indeed clearly the best option.
PM me if you have any questions about it.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login