How did you read my mind? Creeping me out that you feel exactly the same as I do.bbkk wrote:Fianna13 wrote:Would it be a bad idea if I focused on Retake and review for the next 3 days? :/
I don't know about other people but that's what I'm going to do. Just casually do 2 PTs and drill some difficult LR questions.
It feels a bit weird this time. The week before Oct test I felt a mix of anxiety and confidence, and a lot of excitement. This time...nothing. The numbness is a bit scary though, and sad. I have lost my passion for the test.
Post removed. Forum
- bombaysippin
- Posts: 1977
- Joined: Fri Mar 22, 2013 3:11 pm
Re: December 2013 Retakers
-
- Posts: 1846
- Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2008 2:11 pm
Re: December 2013 Retakers
.
Last edited by 062914123 on Thu Jul 03, 2014 7:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Otunga
- Posts: 1317
- Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2013 7:56 pm
Re: December 2013 Retakers
Just a whole section.bee wrote:UUUUGGGGHHH im going to have to find some time to sneak in more rc. i have literally only done rc as a part of pts EVER, and i am now seeing the effects, lol. how do you guys drill rc? do you time yourself per passage like game drills or do you time a whole section like lr drills?Otunga wrote:Definitely! I was only doing RC while PTing for the most part, which hasn't been too too frequent, and I was getting rusty for sure. But a couple sections later and I'm back to my average.bee wrote:just did pt 52 rc as an untimed section and holy crap missed two anyway lowest rc score ive gotten in ages and ages
thats what i get for slacking on rc, i guess gotta tighten up, without a good rc score im done for
Apparently I can only reliably finish a LR section if it's a modern one (50s/60s/pt70). Anything older than that and it's a struggle. It's nothing new though. I just stopped doing older sections the last couple months before October and forgot it was a thing for me.
Last edited by Otunga on Tue Dec 03, 2013 7:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 784
- Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 12:50 am
Re: December 2013 Retakers
.
Last edited by dosto on Fri Sep 04, 2015 3:30 am, edited 1 time in total.
- Otunga
- Posts: 1317
- Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2013 7:56 pm
Re: December 2013 Retakers
We know our habits are largely entrenched at this point, and that we can't improve much, if at all. But at the same time, the chances are good we'll get improvement simply because we scored at the lower end of our averages (assuming that since we're retaking). Combine all that and it makes sense.dosto wrote:On the RARE occasion that I drill RC, I just do sections back to back; if I'm too lazy then I do 1.5 sections in 45 minutes.bee wrote:UUUUGGGGHHH im going to have to find some time to sneak in more rc. i have literally only done rc as a part of pts EVER, and i am now seeing the effects, lol. how do you guys drill rc? do you time yourself per passage like game drills or do you time a whole section like lr drills?Otunga wrote:Definitely! I was only doing RC while PTing for the most part, which hasn't been too too frequent, and I was getting rusty for sure. But a couple sections later and I'm back to my average.bee wrote:just did pt 52 rc as an untimed section and holy crap missed two anyway lowest rc score ive gotten in ages and ages
thats what i get for slacking on rc, i guess gotta tighten up, without a good rc score im done for
Next three days for me are going to be hour of LG, light LR drills, and one RC section. Really symbolic because at this point I just don't care
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 101
- Joined: Wed Oct 30, 2013 12:50 pm
Re: December 2013 Retakers
This week is less about making significant strides than about staying fresh, and not becoming rusty.
-
- Posts: 551
- Joined: Tue Jul 02, 2013 5:07 am
Re: December 2013 Retakers
so i just took a timed RC section and missed 16 questions
RC has been really shaky for me and i feel really dissapointed right now.
i would love some suggestions about how to approach RC. i don't know, i feel like i'm doing something wrong
RC has been really shaky for me and i feel really dissapointed right now.
i would love some suggestions about how to approach RC. i don't know, i feel like i'm doing something wrong
- Otunga
- Posts: 1317
- Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2013 7:56 pm
Re: December 2013 Retakers
What'd you score in Oct? Have you read Manhattan and/or The Trainer?chizzy wrote:so i just took a timed RC section and missed 16 questions
RC has been really shaky for me and i feel really dissapointed right now.
i would love some suggestions about how to approach RC. i don't know, i feel like i'm doing something wrong
-
- Posts: 297
- Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2011 1:05 am
Re: December 2013 Retakers
IF this is an outlier, then I wouldn't be too worry about it, you might just be burned out. How are your other time RC sections? If you are consistently missing more than 6-7 ish, then you are either not reading the passage correctly or you are taking too much logical leaps when you are choosing answers.chizzy wrote:so i just took a timed RC section and missed 16 questions
RC has been really shaky for me and i feel really dissapointed right now.
i would love some suggestions about how to approach RC. i don't know, i feel like i'm doing something wrong
-
- Posts: 46
- Joined: Thu Apr 18, 2013 4:34 pm
Re: December 2013 Retakers
whats up everybody
im retaking a 167 from october
last 4 pts have been 171,175,170,171 so im hoping to at at least beat my october score
currently averaging around
minus 0 to 2 AR
minus 0 to 2 per LR section
minus 5-9ish RC
so gonna be drilling RC hard the next couple days and hoping i can limit rc errors to 4/5 or so on test day
im retaking a 167 from october
last 4 pts have been 171,175,170,171 so im hoping to at at least beat my october score
currently averaging around
minus 0 to 2 AR
minus 0 to 2 per LR section
minus 5-9ish RC
so gonna be drilling RC hard the next couple days and hoping i can limit rc errors to 4/5 or so on test day
-
- Posts: 1957
- Joined: Sat Jun 15, 2013 4:16 pm
Re: December 2013 Retakers
Haven't dropped by here in a while, but I'm glad to see the October waiter-retakers dominating in this final week. Keep it up guys. I'm feeling really fresh and focused; I guess all my November slacking is paying off.
- retaking23
- Posts: 452
- Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 10:34 pm
Re: December 2013 Retakers
I was supposed to do my last two PTs today but was so lazy that I just barely forced myself to do one.
PT 67
Score: 178
RC:-1
LR:-1
LG:-0
LR:-1
If only I could've gotten this as my official score last year. Sigh.
Second LR was noticeably harder than first one. RC was quite easy (did not think I would be writing this as often as I have been). The !Kung passage was structured in a very simple manner and it made absorbing the info a lot easier. Mike Kim wrote this in the Trainer and I now do have to admit, LSAT passages are written very clearly and are examples of excellent writing in general. LG, which killed me last year, was also very easy. I would love an LG and an RC similar to 67's on 71. Weird sections over difficult ones (e.g. mauve dinosaurs pt 57) any day.
Curve for 67 seems a lot more palatable now.
Will take 70 tomorrow to wrap up PTing. Take it easy people.
PT 67
Score: 178
RC:-1
LR:-1
LG:-0
LR:-1
If only I could've gotten this as my official score last year. Sigh.
Second LR was noticeably harder than first one. RC was quite easy (did not think I would be writing this as often as I have been). The !Kung passage was structured in a very simple manner and it made absorbing the info a lot easier. Mike Kim wrote this in the Trainer and I now do have to admit, LSAT passages are written very clearly and are examples of excellent writing in general. LG, which killed me last year, was also very easy. I would love an LG and an RC similar to 67's on 71. Weird sections over difficult ones (e.g. mauve dinosaurs pt 57) any day.
Curve for 67 seems a lot more palatable now.
Will take 70 tomorrow to wrap up PTing. Take it easy people.
-
- Posts: 101
- Joined: Wed Oct 30, 2013 12:50 pm
Re: December 2013 Retakers
PT 54.
RC: -1
LR1: -1
Exp (PT 50 RC): -3
LG: -0
LR 2: -0
99/101, 180.
First 180, I'm pumped. Partial retake, I'd seen the games and parts of the LR but not the entire sections. Games I finished with 9 minutes left, the 1 question in LR 1 I got wrong was such an annoying question. #18 if u want to check it out. I get it looking back, but chose A over C when deciding btwn the 2. Damn sucker choices. RC my scores still vary. If I go -1 on test day I'm jumping through the roof. My average is still 3-5 wrong per.
4 days LFG
RC: -1
LR1: -1
Exp (PT 50 RC): -3
LG: -0
LR 2: -0
99/101, 180.
First 180, I'm pumped. Partial retake, I'd seen the games and parts of the LR but not the entire sections. Games I finished with 9 minutes left, the 1 question in LR 1 I got wrong was such an annoying question. #18 if u want to check it out. I get it looking back, but chose A over C when deciding btwn the 2. Damn sucker choices. RC my scores still vary. If I go -1 on test day I'm jumping through the roof. My average is still 3-5 wrong per.
4 days LFG
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- John_rizzy_rawls
- Posts: 3468
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2012 2:44 pm
Re: December 2013 Retakers
PT53, LR1, Q8
Why does D weaken the argument more than E?
Why does D weaken the argument more than E?
-
- Posts: 1846
- Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2008 2:11 pm
Re: December 2013 Retakers
.
Last edited by 062914123 on Thu Jul 03, 2014 7:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- John_rizzy_rawls
- Posts: 3468
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2012 2:44 pm
Re: December 2013 Retakers
Ty tybee wrote:e is very weak. it talks about a single other study involving a small number of children, only several of which were near sighted. we dont know if the study was a good study, and for all we know, the children were near sighted because its genetic or something and they would have been near sighted no matter what.John_rizzy_rawls wrote:PT53, LR1, Q8
Why does D weakest the argument more than E?
d, on the other hand, totally destroys the stim. if the last two studies are invalid, as they would be according to d, then theres nothing to compare the first study to. and if we have nothing to compare the first study to, how can we draw the conclusion in the stim?
- cheme2014
- Posts: 214
- Joined: Wed Oct 16, 2013 9:10 pm
Re: December 2013 Retakers
Same here, except for the "fresh and focused" part haha...snagglepuss wrote:Haven't dropped by here in a while, but I'm glad to see the October waiter-retakers dominating in this final week. Keep it up guys. I'm feeling really fresh and focused; I guess all my November slacking is paying off.
Good luck to everyone this week!
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- AAJD2B
- Posts: 871
- Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2012 12:37 am
Re: December 2013 Retakers
+1. I haven't done too much either, and realize I am scoring better when I do take timed PTs. It also helps that I have some acceptances from decent schools already. I am going in on Saturday with a relaxed and stress-free demeanor.snagglepuss wrote:Haven't dropped by here in a while, but I'm glad to see the October waiter-retakers dominating in this final week. Keep it up guys. I'm feeling really fresh and focused; I guess all my November slacking is paying off.
-
- Posts: 313
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 11:04 pm
Re: December 2013 Retakers
Final PT today! PT 68, fresh.
-
- Posts: 6874
- Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2012 8:32 am
Post removed.
Post removed.
Last edited by PourMeTea on Fri May 08, 2015 12:17 am, edited 1 time in total.
- mhaas
- Posts: 206
- Joined: Fri Jul 26, 2013 10:53 am
Re: December 2013 Retakers
Good luck to you as well!PourMeTea wrote:GL all
I'm going over the questions I missed on PT 36, and I am still having trouble with the set-up for game 3. I'm usually rock solid on games, but this game is giving me all kinds of problems. Does anybody have any insight on how they'd tackle it?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- bbkk
- Posts: 728
- Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2012 4:28 pm
Re: December 2013 Retakers
retaking23 wrote: Score: 178
Good job guys!Thorcogan wrote: 99/101, 180.
I didn't find any key inference for this game and my set up is nothing fancy, just the same as the one described in below link. HTHmhaas wrote: I'm going over the questions I missed on PT 36, and I am still having trouble with the set-up for game 3. I'm usually rock solid on games, but this game is giving me all kinds of problems. Does anybody have any insight on how they'd tackle it?
http://www.manhattanlsat.com/forums/diagram-t284.html
-
- Posts: 551
- Joined: Tue Jul 02, 2013 5:07 am
Re: December 2013 Retakers
yeah. i think i'm reading too fast. and i just started doing more of the RC's in the 60's tooFianna13 wrote:IF this is an outlier, then I wouldn't be too worry about it, you might just be burned out. How are your other time RC sections? If you are consistently missing more than 6-7 ish, then you are either not reading the passage correctly or you are taking too much logical leaps when you are choosing answers.chizzy wrote:so i just took a timed RC section and missed 16 questions
RC has been really shaky for me and i feel really dissapointed right now.
i would love some suggestions about how to approach RC. i don't know, i feel like i'm doing something wrong
-
- Posts: 551
- Joined: Tue Jul 02, 2013 5:07 am
Re: December 2013 Retakers
i recently read the trainer, and changed my strategy. i think its because i changed my strategy so late.Otunga wrote:What'd you score in Oct? Have you read Manhattan and/or The Trainer?chizzy wrote:so i just took a timed RC section and missed 16 questions
RC has been really shaky for me and i feel really dissapointed right now.
i would love some suggestions about how to approach RC. i don't know, i feel like i'm doing something wrong
- retaking23
- Posts: 452
- Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 10:34 pm
Re: December 2013 Retakers
Woke up a little early early albeit with only 4 hours of sleep. Feeling all sorts of groggy and don't wanna do any LSAT. This is probably what Saturday will feel like. FML
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login