3.0 undegrad gpa 168 LSAT score (automatically rejected ?) Forum
- pad
- Posts: 16
- Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2008 6:30 pm
3.0 undegrad gpa 168 LSAT score (automatically rejected ?)
I had a 3.0 undegrad gpa about a year ago and a 168 LSAT score,
but im looking to apply to University of California Law schools where the lowest admitted Gpa is nowhere underneath a 3.41?
does that mean that these schools automatically reject me because of my low gpa?
110 U. of California (Hastings) 3.41 3.74 159 164 26.8% 18.9 71.8% 96.3% CA 84.1% 62% +22.1%
111 U. of California-Berkeley 3.65 3.89 163 169 11% 12 97.2% 98.4% CA 87% 62% +25%
112 U. of California-Davis 3.35 3.73 160 164 28.1% 13.9 78.7% 93.3% CA 72.2% 62% +10.2%
113 U. of California-Los Angeles 3.44 3.8 162 169 18.9% 12.5 96.8% 99.7% CA 87.8% 62% +25.8%
but im looking to apply to University of California Law schools where the lowest admitted Gpa is nowhere underneath a 3.41?
does that mean that these schools automatically reject me because of my low gpa?
110 U. of California (Hastings) 3.41 3.74 159 164 26.8% 18.9 71.8% 96.3% CA 84.1% 62% +22.1%
111 U. of California-Berkeley 3.65 3.89 163 169 11% 12 97.2% 98.4% CA 87% 62% +25%
112 U. of California-Davis 3.35 3.73 160 164 28.1% 13.9 78.7% 93.3% CA 72.2% 62% +10.2%
113 U. of California-Los Angeles 3.44 3.8 162 169 18.9% 12.5 96.8% 99.7% CA 87.8% 62% +25.8%
- USC2009
- Posts: 199
- Joined: Tue May 20, 2008 6:37 pm
Re: 3.0 undegrad gpa 168 LSAT score (automatically rejected ?)
Based on LSN, it seems like you're kind of in the grey zone between accepted and rejected at Davis and Hastings. I would apply. UCLA and Berkeley - not so much.
- koggit
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Sat May 24, 2008 11:50 pm
Re: 3.0 undegrad gpa 168 LSAT score (automatically rejected ?)
This is jibberish to me.pad wrote:110 U. of California (Hastings) 3.41 3.74 159 164 26.8% 18.9 71.8% 96.3% CA 84.1% 62% +22.1%
111 U. of California-Berkeley 3.65 3.89 163 169 11% 12 97.2% 98.4% CA 87% 62% +25%
112 U. of California-Davis 3.35 3.73 160 164 28.1% 13.9 78.7% 93.3% CA 72.2% 62% +10.2%
113 U. of California-Los Angeles 3.44 3.8 162 169 18.9% 12.5 96.8% 99.7% CA 87.8% 62% +25.8%
-
- Posts: 41
- Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 10:52 pm
Re: 3.0 undegrad gpa 168 LSAT score (automatically rejected ?)
That's not the lowest admitted GPA. I assume it's the 25th percentile, although for Boalt and UCLA, at least, the numbers aren't current.
That said, yeah, Boalt in particular is going to be rough. They're very particular about GPA.
That said, yeah, Boalt in particular is going to be rough. They're very particular about GPA.
- worldtraveler
- Posts: 8676
- Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2007 4:47 am
Re: 3.0 undegrad gpa 168 LSAT score (automatically rejected ?)
Those stats are really hard to understand. Post them so they're clearer.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- playhero
- Posts: 66
- Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2007 6:04 pm
Re: 3.0 undegrad gpa 168 LSAT score (automatically rejected ?)
No they will not automatically reject you. However all the UC's like GPA more than lsat, so you picked the wrong schools to apply to =/.
- mikehoe
- Posts: 36
- Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2010 1:34 pm
Re: 3.0 undegrad gpa 168 LSAT score (automatically rejected ?)
I remember I went to a panel that answered questions for prospective students at UC Davis Law and one of the students enrolled and on the panel mentioned that she got in to UCD Law with a 3.0 gpa, Although she never mentioned her LSAT score.
-
- Posts: 328
- Joined: Mon Dec 15, 2008 12:46 am
Re: 3.0 undegrad gpa 168 LSAT score (automatically rejected ?)
Berkeley: OUT
UCLA: OUT
Hastings: WL/OUT
Davis: WL/IN
UCLA: OUT
Hastings: WL/OUT
Davis: WL/IN
-
- Posts: 908
- Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2010 1:57 pm
Re: 3.0 undegrad gpa 168 LSAT score (automatically rejected ?)
Since the OP was almost 2 years ago, you should compare your predictions...Action Jackson wrote:Berkeley: OUT
UCLA: OUT
Hastings: WL/OUT
Davis: WL/IN
-
- Posts: 328
- Joined: Mon Dec 15, 2008 12:46 am
Re: 3.0 undegrad gpa 168 LSAT score (automatically rejected ?)
Wow. I didn't even think to check the date. Who digs this shit up?rando wrote:Since the OP was almost 2 years ago, you should compare your predictions...Action Jackson wrote:Berkeley: OUT
UCLA: OUT
Hastings: WL/OUT
Davis: WL/IN