This sounds more like a rationale for not pursuing the JDmassappeal wrote:I know people at my job working for the federal government as GS-10 grade levels or higher with solely a bachelor's degree, if I maintain my job while continuing my education in pursuit of a JD there is no reason why I couldn't reach that pinnacle or higher with a decent pay check and full government benefits.
New England law schools Forum
- Clemenceau
- Posts: 940
- Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2014 11:33 am
Re: (3.4/149) NEW ENGLAND LAW SCHOOLS
- pancakes3
- Posts: 6619
- Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2014 2:49 pm
Re: (3.4/149) NEW ENGLAND LAW SCHOOLS
can't use logic to reason with someone who cops a 149?
- cavalier1138
- Posts: 8007
- Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2016 8:01 pm
Re: (3.4/149) NEW ENGLAND LAW SCHOOLS
Well, this was a delightful read.
Best of luck with that chipper attitude, OP. Tell us all how it goes when you graduate from your "non-elite" law school.
Best of luck with that chipper attitude, OP. Tell us all how it goes when you graduate from your "non-elite" law school.
-
- Posts: 346
- Joined: Sun May 15, 2016 11:40 pm
Re: (3.4/149) NEW ENGLAND LAW SCHOOLS
lol, the savagery that is TLS.
-
- Posts: 116
- Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2016 3:57 pm
Re: (3.4/149) NEW ENGLAND LAW SCHOOLS
Op came on tls looking for advice and then summarily rejected most if not all of it... I'd leave him/her to their own devices. Who knows, maybe op maxed out his LSAT potential. It appears that way from the arguments posted at least.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- UVA2B
- Posts: 3570
- Joined: Sun May 22, 2016 10:48 pm
Re: (3.4/149) NEW ENGLAND LAW SCHOOLS
This is flame, nothing to see here folks. They hit on nearly every mantra TLSers love to rail against. New account created today, combined with the inanity of it all, no need to let it get you in a tizzy.
- studyingeveryday
- Posts: 545
- Joined: Thu Nov 26, 2015 10:19 pm
Re: (3.4/149) NEW ENGLAND LAW SCHOOLS
(assuming you're not trolling)
You already have a stable job going on. That is more than a sufficient reason for waiting out a year to retake. If you had already taken it twice, or three times, after months of studying and working your way up from a 130, well, that's different (though you still shouldn't apply with a 149). But it sounds like you barely studied and this is your first take, and you are being inconsiderate to say the least to take on law school without giving yourself the best chances you can by getting a better score and then getting into a better school.
You already have a stable job going on. That is more than a sufficient reason for waiting out a year to retake. If you had already taken it twice, or three times, after months of studying and working your way up from a 130, well, that's different (though you still shouldn't apply with a 149). But it sounds like you barely studied and this is your first take, and you are being inconsiderate to say the least to take on law school without giving yourself the best chances you can by getting a better score and then getting into a better school.