172/3.63 Non URM Female... T14 Chances??

[Cerberus12]

172 LSAT, 3.63 Classics Major. Average softs (undergrad moot court, leadership positions in honor societies). What are my chances at T14s?

[Mullens]

Should track pretty closely to this. You can move the numbers around to increase the sample size or decrease it closer to your GPA.

[scoobysnax]

Have almost identical numbers to you and mylsn was pretty spot on, except for Berkeley (I was rejected).

[thestatusguo]

My SO got into SLS with those numbers, but he was also STEM. Good luck!

[Ti Malice]

For some reason myLSN is not picking up all of the data from LSN. That table definitely overstates OP's chances at SLS.

[Cerberus12]

For some reason myLSN is not picking up all of the data from LSN. That table definitely overstates OP's chances at SLS.

Can someone explain how all these calculators work? Blueprint will say high 80s for duke but LSAC says like 25 and then this says 91...

[03152016]

i eliminated 2011-2012 cycle, fixed gpa range, used lsat range 171-172
looking good from ccn down
congrats, i predict a great cycle

[03152016]

For some reason myLSN is not picking up all of the data from LSN. That table definitely overstates OP's chances at SLS.

Can someone explain how all these calculators work? Blueprint will say high 80s for duke but LSAC says like 25 and then this says 91...

the lsac calculator is a joke
at least it was when i used it back in 2011
mylsn uses data from lawschoolnumbers
which aggregates real stats entered by actual ls applicants
it's the best tool i know of
no idea about blueprint

[03152016]

of course you have a solid lsat
but if for some reason you underperformed and want to give it another stab
that could be worth some major moolah...

[Crowing]

For some reason myLSN is not picking up all of the data from LSN. That table definitely overstates OP's chances at SLS.

Can someone explain how all these calculators work? Blueprint will say high 80s for duke but LSAC says like 25 and then this says 91...

MyLSN isn't a "calculator." Calculators blow. You're better off looking at the real data.