3.1/175 Forum
-
- Posts: 16
- Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2010 12:06 am
3.1/175
I have a 3.1 gpa and hope to get a 175 lsat score (consistently scoring on old tests). Do I have a shot at any of the t14 schools? If so, which ones seem to fit my severe splitter status the best?
- dpk711
- Posts: 1241
- Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2010 5:24 pm
Re: 3.1/175
Of the lower T14, GULC is your best bet. You can ED to UVA as well. Also, come back with a real score.
-
- Posts: 849
- Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2007 8:08 pm
Re: 3.1/175
Definite shot at schools like Gtown and Cornell. Possibly Northwestern, depending on your WE. HYSCCN and I suspect MVP are probably out (maybe UVA with ED and a targetted PS)jkupps2415 wrote:I have a 3.1 gpa and hope to get a 175 lsat score (consistently scoring on old tests). Do I have a shot at any of the t14 schools? If so, which ones seem to fit my severe splitter status the best?
-
- Posts: 132
- Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2011 4:28 am
Re: 3.1/175
Boalt and Duke are out too. Realistically your best chances are Gtown, Cornell, and Northwestern. If you have work experience, Northwestern would almost be a lock with those stats.bhan87 wrote:Definite shot at schools like Gtown and Cornell. Possibly Northwestern, depending on your WE. HYSCCN and I suspect MVP are probably out (maybe UVA with ED and a targetted PS)jkupps2415 wrote:I have a 3.1 gpa and hope to get a 175 lsat score (consistently scoring on old tests). Do I have a shot at any of the t14 schools? If so, which ones seem to fit my severe splitter status the best?
-
- Posts: 973
- Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2011 6:06 pm
Re: 3.1/175
What BK187 said about a real score.
I don't know about Cornell. Their median GPA is lower so it makes sense to say them, but how many extreme splitters do you see there? I'd blanket the lower t-14, and ED to one of them (but don't waste your ED on Columbia or something as it ain't happening). I'd apply to all of them as you never know who will love your app. Personally, I'd ED to UVA in your situation.
I don't know about Cornell. Their median GPA is lower so it makes sense to say them, but how many extreme splitters do you see there? I'd blanket the lower t-14, and ED to one of them (but don't waste your ED on Columbia or something as it ain't happening). I'd apply to all of them as you never know who will love your app. Personally, I'd ED to UVA in your situation.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 973
- Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2011 6:06 pm
Re: 3.1/175
I don't think those stats are ever a lock for a t-14.stylishlaw wrote:Boalt and Duke are out too. Realistically your best chances are Gtown, Cornell, and Northwestern. If you have work experience, Northwestern would almost be a lock with those stats.bhan87 wrote:Definite shot at schools like Gtown and Cornell. Possibly Northwestern, depending on your WE. HYSCCN and I suspect MVP are probably out (maybe UVA with ED and a targetted PS)jkupps2415 wrote:I have a 3.1 gpa and hope to get a 175 lsat score (consistently scoring on old tests). Do I have a shot at any of the t14 schools? If so, which ones seem to fit my severe splitter status the best?
- dpk711
- Posts: 1241
- Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2010 5:24 pm
Re: 3.1/175
Cornell seems to have a soft 3.3 floor. OP will most likely get WL.
-
- Posts: 132
- Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2011 4:28 am
Re: 3.1/175
Make sure you apply to UCLA/USC/Vandy/Texas/WUSTL/GW
You're unlikely to get UCLA, USC, Vandy, or Texas since they really like GPA. But WUSTL will throw TONS of money at you.
You're unlikely to get UCLA, USC, Vandy, or Texas since they really like GPA. But WUSTL will throw TONS of money at you.
-
- Posts: 973
- Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2011 6:06 pm
Re: 3.1/175
as will almost every law school in the midwest.stylishlaw wrote:Make sure you apply to UCLA/USC/Vandy/Texas/WUSTL/GW
You're unlikely to get UCLA, USC, Vandy, or Texas since they really like GPA. But WUSTL will throw TONS of money at you.
-
- Posts: 16
- Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2010 12:06 am
Re: 3.1/175
In terms of work experience--does it have to be law related? I have worked multiple non-related internships, as well as part time jobs throughout my earlier college years. During my upper level years, I started my own business, raised capital, and helped it grow as it remains expanding today.stylishlaw wrote:Boalt and Duke are out too. Realistically your best chances are Gtown, Cornell, and Northwestern. If you have work experience, Northwestern would almost be a lock with those stats.bhan87 wrote:Definite shot at schools like Gtown and Cornell. Possibly Northwestern, depending on your WE. HYSCCN and I suspect MVP are probably out (maybe UVA with ED and a targetted PS)jkupps2415 wrote:I have a 3.1 gpa and hope to get a 175 lsat score (consistently scoring on old tests). Do I have a shot at any of the t14 schools? If so, which ones seem to fit my severe splitter status the best?
Does any of this experience help my chances? If so--how much?
-
- Posts: 132
- Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2011 4:28 am
Re: 3.1/175
I apologize since I didn't make it very clear in my earlier post. You're not an "auto-lock" anywhere since splitter cycles are very hard to predict. Also you need an actual LSAT score since thinking about where you can get in with practice test scores is akin to thinking about what houses you can buy with monopoly money.
I can say that with Northwestern they really like people with 1) >=170 LSAT and 2) prestigious or significant work experience
They are known to ignore GPA and let in people with 2.XX GPA who meet those requirements. For that reason, they will be your best chance of getting into a T14 school. Make sure you do their admissions interview and do it well. Write targeted essays too.
Hope that helps.
I can say that with Northwestern they really like people with 1) >=170 LSAT and 2) prestigious or significant work experience
They are known to ignore GPA and let in people with 2.XX GPA who meet those requirements. For that reason, they will be your best chance of getting into a T14 school. Make sure you do their admissions interview and do it well. Write targeted essays too.
Hope that helps.
- IAFG
- Posts: 6641
- Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 1:26 pm
Re: 3.1/175
with WE and ED i think OP's an auto-admit for NU.flexityflex86 wrote: I don't think those stats are ever a lock for a t-14.
edit: and, y'know, an ACTUAL score.
-
- Posts: 16
- Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2010 12:06 am
Re: 3.1/175
Haha yes I understand everyone. An ACTUAL score. Just have been putting in a lot of work towards this and wanted to get a little taste of possibilities for my future--even if it is a bit premature.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 16
- Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2010 12:06 am
Re: 3.1/175
No apology necessary and thanks for the input. In terms of "prestigious or significant work experience," do you think my entrepreneurial experiences listed earlier would qualify? Or is this reserved for big name businesses and whatnot?stylishlaw wrote:I apologize since I didn't make it very clear in my earlier post. You're not an "auto-lock" anywhere since splitter cycles are very hard to predict. Also you need an actual LSAT score since thinking about where you can get in with practice test scores is akin to thinking about what houses you can buy with monopoly money.
I can say that with Northwestern they really like people with 1) >=170 LSAT and 2) prestigious or significant work experience
They are known to ignore GPA and let in people with 2.XX GPA who meet those requirements. For that reason, they will be your best chance of getting into a T14 school. Make sure you do their admissions interview and do it well. Write targeted essays too.
Hope that helps.
- dpk711
- Posts: 1241
- Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2010 5:24 pm
Re: 3.1/175
Any post-undergraduate full-time WE is counted for NU.jkupps2415 wrote:No apology necessary and thanks for the input. In terms of "prestigious or significant work experience," do you think my entrepreneurial experiences listed earlier would qualify? Or is this reserved for big name businesses and whatnot?stylishlaw wrote:I apologize since I didn't make it very clear in my earlier post. You're not an "auto-lock" anywhere since splitter cycles are very hard to predict. Also you need an actual LSAT score since thinking about where you can get in with practice test scores is akin to thinking about what houses you can buy with monopoly money.
I can say that with Northwestern they really like people with 1) >=170 LSAT and 2) prestigious or significant work experience
They are known to ignore GPA and let in people with 2.XX GPA who meet those requirements. For that reason, they will be your best chance of getting into a T14 school. Make sure you do their admissions interview and do it well. Write targeted essays too.
Hope that helps.
- IAFG
- Posts: 6641
- Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 1:26 pm
Re: 3.1/175
i think waiting table counts.jkupps2415 wrote:
No apology necessary and thanks for the input. In terms of "prestigious or significant work experience," do you think my entrepreneurial experiences listed earlier would qualify? Or is this reserved for big name businesses and whatnot?
in fact, i know it does.
Re: 3.1/175
You know better than I, but I was under the impression that for NU, there was a difference between work experience and substantive work experience (waiting tables vs consulting for a firm).IAFG wrote:i think waiting table counts.jkupps2415 wrote:
No apology necessary and thanks for the input. In terms of "prestigious or significant work experience," do you think my entrepreneurial experiences listed earlier would qualify? Or is this reserved for big name businesses and whatnot?
in fact, i know it does.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- IAFG
- Posts: 6641
- Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 1:26 pm
Re: 3.1/175
yeah, that's in an ideal world, but DVZ admitted to me privately that in practice they make a lot of "compromises" to meet their goals. think about it: if you're being really successful in a non-law job... why are you coming to law school? also, for some reason i don't understand, the original vision was to avoid paralegals.Curry wrote:You know better than I, but I was under the impression that for NU, there was a difference between work experience and substantive work experience (waiting tables vs consulting for a firm).IAFG wrote:i think waiting table counts.jkupps2415 wrote:
No apology necessary and thanks for the input. In terms of "prestigious or significant work experience," do you think my entrepreneurial experiences listed earlier would qualify? Or is this reserved for big name businesses and whatnot?
in fact, i know it does.
-
- Posts: 132
- Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2011 4:28 am
Re: 3.1/175
I think your work experience would be looked at favorably by the admissions officers. Northwestern also gives ample opportunity to spin your experience however you want it through their essays and interviews so any kind of work experience is likely beneficial since it gives you something to talk about. Evaluating WE is kind of a black box. I think someone who did some time at Goldman is going to get a bump up in admissions but outside of that we can only really speculate. I'd worry more about the LSAT though. Like my pre-law advisor told me, don't tell yourself where you can't go... make THEM tell you that you can't go.
Re: 3.1/175
Fair enough. Thanks for the info.IAFG wrote:yeah, that's in an ideal world, but DVZ admitted to me privately that in practice they make a lot of "compromises" to meet their goals. think about it: if you're being really successful in a non-law job... why are you coming to law school? also, for some reason i don't understand, the original vision was to avoid paralegals.Curry wrote:You know better than I, but I was under the impression that for NU, there was a difference between work experience and substantive work experience (waiting tables vs consulting for a firm).IAFG wrote:i think waiting table counts.jkupps2415 wrote:
No apology necessary and thanks for the input. In terms of "prestigious or significant work experience," do you think my entrepreneurial experiences listed earlier would qualify? Or is this reserved for big name businesses and whatnot?
in fact, i know it does.
-
- Posts: 18203
- Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:47 pm
Re: 3.1/175
At NU, WE Years is a just another number. Quality of WE is a huge soft.
3.1/175 might need the soft factor bump, it might not.
The paralegal thing makes no sense. I assume it is lawyer prestige whoring.
3.1/175 might need the soft factor bump, it might not.
The paralegal thing makes no sense. I assume it is lawyer prestige whoring.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- IAFG
- Posts: 6641
- Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 1:26 pm
Re: 3.1/175
i dunno about that. tho at OCI, it's the biggest soft (after diversity).Desert Fox wrote:At NU, WE Years is a just another number. Quality of WE is a huge soft.
3.1/175 might need the soft factor bump, it might not.
The paralegal thing makes no sense. I assume it is lawyer prestige whoring.
Re: 3.1/175
Do you think thats mainly the case at NU because of its work experience requirement or do you think thats something that affects everyone at all the top law schools?IAFG wrote:i dunno about that. tho at OCI, it's the biggest soft (after diversity).Desert Fox wrote:At NU, WE Years is a just another number. Quality of WE is a huge soft.
3.1/175 might need the soft factor bump, it might not.
The paralegal thing makes no sense. I assume it is lawyer prestige whoring.
- IAFG
- Posts: 6641
- Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 1:26 pm
Re: 3.1/175
you'd have to ask someone at other LSs, i have no idea if NU is skewing my own perspective.Curry wrote: Do you think thats mainly the case at NU because of its work experience requirement or do you think thats something that affects everyone at all the top law schools?
Re: 3.1/175
Hm alright. Thanks.IAFG wrote:you'd have to ask someone at other LSs, i have no idea if NU is skewing my own perspective.Curry wrote: Do you think thats mainly the case at NU because of its work experience requirement or do you think thats something that affects everyone at all the top law schools?
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login