170 2.9 LSDAS Fordham? Forum

ODBCP · Post by **ODBCP** » Thu Jan 07, 2010 7:50 pm

Hey all,

Completed my FT Fordham app, came in with a 170 and a 2.9 LSDAS(3.0 UG) with a decent upward trend and a good addendum. Good softs but nothing breathtaking. Wondering how I stand? I'm assuming I'll be WL'd but what are my chances of getting off it? Should I write them a note and just go for PT? How have they treated splitters historically? LawSchoolPredictor has me at consider for FT and admit for PT.

SAE · Post by **SAE** » Thu Jan 07, 2010 7:53 pm

http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 1&t=102454

This guy was waitlisted with a 3.4/169, so I'd say a WL is likely.

ODBCP · Post by **ODBCP** » Thu Jan 07, 2010 8:00 pm

Yeah but my grades suck b/c of a few semesters traveling trying to be a pro skier. It's not even a good excuse!

Do they just YP/WL all splitters or high LSATs?

Richie Tenenbaum · Post by **Richie Tenenbaum** » Thu Jan 07, 2010 8:01 pm

Not looking so hot:

http://www.hourumd.com/?school=Fordham% ... at=168-172

Three people show as being accepted. One of them was a WL->acceptance. Two of them were electrical engineering majors and the other was a double major in math and physics from a top 30 private.

Prepare for a waitlist and then doing all you can do to get accepted off the W/L.

Also, throw an app at Northwestern, Georgetown, and WUSTL if you haven't yet.

Richie Tenenbaum · Post by **Richie Tenenbaum** » Thu Jan 07, 2010 8:04 pm

ODBCP wrote:Yeah but my grades suck b/c of a few semesters traveling trying to be a pro skier. It's not even a good excuse!

Do they just YP/WL all splitters or high LSATs?

Fordham doesn't seem to YP that much (http://fordham.lawschoolnumbers.com/sta ... Cycle=0910 ). They just seem to be not as splitter friendly as other schools. Maybe they'll be more splitter friendly to help maintain/increase their LSAT numbers when taking part-time numbers into account. Not sure that's all too likely though.

MC Southstar · Post by **MC Southstar** » Thu Jan 07, 2010 8:09 pm

They waitlisted me early and my numbers are both better than yours.

ODBCP · Post by **ODBCP** » Thu Jan 07, 2010 8:10 pm

True, a bunch of the people that were rejected on that list ended up at GULC, NW and the like. I didn't apply to NW because I didn't think I'd get in(heard they like lots of WE, which I only have a year). Much too late to try?

Space_Cowboy · Post by **Space_Cowboy** » Thu Jan 07, 2010 8:11 pm

A 170 is a terrible thing to waste on Fordham.

ODBCP · Post by **ODBCP** » Thu Jan 07, 2010 8:15 pm

Space_Cowboy wrote:A 170 is a terrible thing to waste on Fordham.

Haha what makes you say that?

170 2.9 LSDAS Fordham? Forum

170 2.9 LSDAS Fordham?

Re: 170 2.9 LSDAS Fordham?

Re: 170 2.9 LSDAS Fordham?

Re: 170 2.9 LSDAS Fordham?

Re: 170 2.9 LSDAS Fordham?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Re: 170 2.9 LSDAS Fordham?

Re: 170 2.9 LSDAS Fordham?

Re: 170 2.9 LSDAS Fordham?

Re: 170 2.9 LSDAS Fordham?

Register for access!