Share Your Experiences, Read About Other Experiences. Please keep posts organized by school and expected year of graduation.
-
tocheer67
- Posts: 36
- Joined: Wed Mar 13, 2013 11:46 pm
Post
by tocheer67 » Mon Mar 18, 2013 5:32 pm
mcs268 wrote:I have 3.56/166. I believe i saw tocheer had 3.2/167. I don't think the fact we're going at the same time means much though, since tocheer has actually hit a median (unlike me).
I'm worried because my GPA is SO low. I'm hoping my strong PS saves me.
Still no movement on my status since 3/13
-
maxiguess
- Posts: 166
- Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2012 12:04 am
Post
by maxiguess » Mon Mar 18, 2013 6:01 pm
tocheer67 wrote:mcs268 wrote:I have 3.56/166. I believe i saw tocheer had 3.2/167. I don't think the fact we're going at the same time means much though, since tocheer has actually hit a median (unlike me).
I'm worried because my GPA is SO low. I'm hoping my strong PS saves me.
Still no movement on my status since 3/13
I'm 3.1/168
Here's to hoping!
-
Gene Parmesan
- Posts: 35
- Joined: Mon Mar 04, 2013 10:36 pm
Post
by Gene Parmesan » Mon Mar 18, 2013 6:02 pm
went CR1 on 3/12 then CR2 on 3/13. Then when I checked on 3/14 the status got reversed to CR1 3/12. I know I'm not going crazy, but has anyone seen this before? Maybe user error on their part?
-
zz888
- Posts: 81
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2013 7:42 pm
Post
by zz888 » Mon Mar 18, 2013 6:34 pm
any consensus on how long of a wait from UR2 to final review/decision?
-
md22
- Posts: 345
- Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2012 6:02 pm
Post
by md22 » Mon Mar 18, 2013 6:48 pm
zz888 wrote:any consensus on how long of a wait from UR2 to final review/decision?
Not sure if there is one or not. I've been CR2 since 2/27. Hoping that this week might be my week!
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
mcs268
- Posts: 250
- Joined: Fri Dec 24, 2010 1:03 pm
Post
by mcs268 » Mon Mar 18, 2013 11:38 pm
maxiguess wrote:tocheer67 wrote:mcs268 wrote:I have 3.56/166. I believe i saw tocheer had 3.2/167. I don't think the fact we're going at the same time means much though, since tocheer has actually hit a median (unlike me).
I'm worried because my GPA is SO low. I'm hoping my strong PS saves me.
Still no movement on my status since 3/13
I'm 3.1/168
Here's to hoping!
I'd be surprised if you both are outright rejected. Above/at the LSAT median will probably mean WL or Accepted. For me, since I'm below both, it's either rejection or acceptance (by an act of god). There's absolutely no reason why they'd put a below median applicant on waitlist.
Starting to think I should just check USC at 9pmEST along with davis..checked probably 20 times today haha
-
TheThriller
- Posts: 2282
- Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2012 10:12 pm
Post
by TheThriller » Mon Mar 18, 2013 11:53 pm
Do we know if rejects are via snail mail? or WLs?
-
L-a-w
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2013 12:57 pm
Post
by L-a-w » Tue Mar 19, 2013 12:18 am
CR 1 1/23, Final review 3/18. No CR 2 or CR 3.
Definitely a rejection?....
-
Dmini7
- Posts: 724
- Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 2:20 pm
Post
by Dmini7 » Tue Mar 19, 2013 12:35 am
L-a-w wrote:CR 1 1/23, Final review 3/18. No CR 2 or CR 3.
Definitely a rejection?....
What are your numbers? CR 2 is not neccesary, some people never get it, and the school states it has no impact on your decision one way or the other.
On a side note, any current students want to create an ask a law students thread for those of us with questions? Or would they be willing to answer questions in here?
Want to continue reading?
Register for access!
Did I mention it was FREE ?
Already a member? Login
-
tocheer67
- Posts: 36
- Joined: Wed Mar 13, 2013 11:46 pm
Post
by tocheer67 » Tue Mar 19, 2013 2:03 am
mcs268 wrote:
I'd be surprised if you both are outright rejected. Above/at the LSAT median will probably mean WL or Accepted.
A random stranger on the Internet saying that I have a chance at USC has actually made me extremely happy. I'd upvote you if I could!
-
b123
- Posts: 183
- Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2012 2:32 pm
Post
by b123 » Tue Mar 19, 2013 2:22 am
tocheer67 wrote:mcs268 wrote:
I'd be surprised if you both are outright rejected. Above/at the LSAT median will probably mean WL or Accepted.
A random stranger on the Internet saying that I have a chance at USC has actually made me extremely happy. I'd upvote you if I could!
-
mcs268
- Posts: 250
- Joined: Fri Dec 24, 2010 1:03 pm
Post
by mcs268 » Tue Mar 19, 2013 8:32 am
Well I mean USC is pretty predictable this cycle when it comes to LSATs. I'm just being realistic, but I guess I'll take being nice haha.
-
romanticegotist
- Posts: 1773
- Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2013 4:15 pm
Post
by romanticegotist » Tue Mar 19, 2013 9:31 am
When Cornell moves faster than USC you know we've got a problem on our hands...
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
lambert8
- Posts: 102
- Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2011 7:02 pm
Post
by lambert8 » Tue Mar 19, 2013 3:01 pm
rejected today via snail mail....165/3.3. best of luck to those still waiting
-
maxiguess
- Posts: 166
- Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2012 12:04 am
Post
by maxiguess » Tue Mar 19, 2013 3:58 pm
Damn, sorry to hear that.
-
Dream Weave
- Posts: 268
- Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2012 2:31 pm
Post
by Dream Weave » Tue Mar 19, 2013 4:08 pm
mcs268 wrote:maxiguess wrote:tocheer67 wrote:mcs268 wrote:I have 3.56/166. I believe i saw tocheer had 3.2/167. I don't think the fact we're going at the same time means much though, since tocheer has actually hit a median (unlike me).
I'm worried because my GPA is SO low. I'm hoping my strong PS saves me.
Still no movement on my status since 3/13
I'm 3.1/168
Here's to hoping!
I'd be surprised if you both are outright rejected. Above/at the LSAT median will probably mean WL or Accepted. For me, since I'm below both, it's either rejection or acceptance (by an act of god). There's absolutely no reason why they'd put a below median applicant on waitlist.
Starting to think I should just check USC at 9pmEST along with davis..checked probably 20 times today haha
I was actually waitlisted at three schools where I was below both medians. It's much more likely you are waitlisted/rejected than accepted.
-
mcs268
- Posts: 250
- Joined: Fri Dec 24, 2010 1:03 pm
Post
by mcs268 » Tue Mar 19, 2013 4:50 pm
Ok, well then I guess there's no reason why they would take me off the waitlist then. Id be fine with that though, since its pretty much loyola or usc at this point and theyre in the same vicinity so no living arrangement changes to worry about.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
anteater1
- Posts: 608
- Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2010 1:37 am
Post
by anteater1 » Tue Mar 19, 2013 4:55 pm
Fwiw very few people are in the admissions office today, although they're still up and running a good amount of the staff and deans are out of state.
-
Dream Weave
- Posts: 268
- Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2012 2:31 pm
Post
by Dream Weave » Tue Mar 19, 2013 4:57 pm
mcs268 wrote:Ok, well then I guess there's no reason why they would take me off the waitlist then. Id be fine with that though, since its pretty much loyola or usc at this point and theyre in the same vicinity so no living arrangement changes to worry about.
Going off this. Why do schools waitlist when you are clearly below both medians? What do they get out of having to deal with your for sometimes as much as 6-7 more months when they know you aren't above either number and you are not a URM?
-
andy261
- Posts: 405
- Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2012 5:50 pm
Post
by andy261 » Tue Mar 19, 2013 5:20 pm
Dream Weave wrote:mcs268 wrote:Ok, well then I guess there's no reason why they would take me off the waitlist then. Id be fine with that though, since its pretty much loyola or usc at this point and theyre in the same vicinity so no living arrangement changes to worry about.
Going off this. Why do schools waitlist when you are clearly below both medians? What do they get out of having to deal with your for sometimes as much as 6-7 more months when they know you aren't above either number and you are not a URM?
Medians could drop which they wouldn't have a good idea of until after deposit deadlines, below both medians applicant paying sticker could balance out a big scholly to an above both medians applicant, maybe they just liked you as a person...
-
BigZuck
- Posts: 11730
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am
Post
by BigZuck » Tue Mar 19, 2013 5:30 pm
andy261 wrote:Dream Weave wrote:mcs268 wrote:Ok, well then I guess there's no reason why they would take me off the waitlist then. Id be fine with that though, since its pretty much loyola or usc at this point and theyre in the same vicinity so no living arrangement changes to worry about.
Going off this. Why do schools waitlist when you are clearly below both medians? What do they get out of having to deal with your for sometimes as much as 6-7 more months when they know you aren't above either number and you are not a URM?
Medians could drop which they wouldn't have a good idea of until after deposit deadlines, below both medians applicant paying sticker could balance out a big scholly to an above both medians applicant, maybe they just liked you as a person...
If the last thing you said is true then more schools need to adopt the "If you love someone then you've got to let them go" approach.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
-
BigZuck
- Posts: 11730
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am
Post
by BigZuck » Tue Mar 19, 2013 5:37 pm
I think schools waitlist people they will never actually accept for the same reason that applicants apply to "safety" schools that they will never actually attend. It's comforting to have a safety net if things don't work out the way you want them to even if all logic dictates that it will.
-
andy261
- Posts: 405
- Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2012 5:50 pm
Post
by andy261 » Tue Mar 19, 2013 5:40 pm
BigZuck wrote:I think schools waitlist people they will never actually accept for the same reason that applicants apply to "safety" schools that they will never actually attend. It's comforting to have a safety net if things don't work out the way you want them to even if all logic dictates that it will.
Nicely said.
-
Dream Weave
- Posts: 268
- Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2012 2:31 pm
Post
by Dream Weave » Tue Mar 19, 2013 5:53 pm
andy261 wrote:BigZuck wrote:I think schools waitlist people they will never actually accept for the same reason that applicants apply to "safety" schools that they will never actually attend. It's comforting to have a safety net if things don't work out the way you want them to even if all logic dictates that it will.
Nicely said.
Unfortunately this makes complete sense from a neutral prospective.
I was really hoping that it meant I AM the special snowflake.
-
luxurylawyer
- Posts: 213
- Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2013 4:17 pm
Post
by luxurylawyer » Tue Mar 19, 2013 5:53 pm
BigZuck wrote:I think schools waitlist people they will never actually accept for the same reason that applicants apply to "safety" schools that they will never actually attend. It's comforting to have a safety net if things don't work out the way you want them to even if all logic dictates that it will.
Interesting perspective. It makes sense, however disheartening it may be.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login