Congrats!!! Dude... It's totally the taramonthofsundays wrote:Holy eff. My email went lowercase!
Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread Forum
- ManOfTheMinute
- Posts: 1557
- Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 12:54 am
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
- carboncopyx
- Posts: 565
- Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2012 10:30 am
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
!!!!!! Ready that phone.amonthofsundays wrote:Holy eff. My email went lowercase!
- ManOfTheMinute
- Posts: 1557
- Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 12:54 am
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
Carbon, is yours still uppercase?carboncopyx wrote:!!!!!! Ready that phone.amonthofsundays wrote:Holy eff. My email went lowercase!
-
- Posts: 106
- Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2013 8:21 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
So to clarify...all TLSers who have had email go to lowercase = acceptance? Anybody who got accepted without that happening?TripTrip wrote:Congrats!amonthofsundays wrote:Holy eff. My email went lowercase!
-
- Posts: 180
- Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2011 3:36 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
It changed sometime after I left work and before I got home lol
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 1403
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 4:57 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
NICE. SLS 16 for lifeamonthofsundays wrote:Holy eff. My email went lowercase!
-
- Posts: 180
- Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2011 3:36 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
Man if this is legit tomorrow is going to be an amazing day.
- carboncopyx
- Posts: 565
- Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2012 10:30 am
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
I hate to sound like a broken record, but... my status checker isn't working. XDManOfTheMinute wrote:Carbon, is yours still uppercase?
I don't expect anything from S, though. I have resigned myself to the thought of perhaps becoming the only Hamilton for whom the Hamilton was unnecessary as a lure away from YHS.
-
- Posts: 180
- Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2011 3:36 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
Relax you are getting into Harvard fosho. KB hasn't admitted anyone since January.carboncopyx wrote:I hate to sound like a broken record, but... my status checker isn't working. XDManOfTheMinute wrote:Carbon, is yours still uppercase?
I don't expect anything from S, though. I have resigned myself to the thought of perhaps becoming the only Hamilton for whom the Hamilton was unnecessary as a lure away from YHS.
- jselson
- Posts: 6337
- Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2013 3:51 am
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
Mine ain't neither :/carboncopyx wrote:I hate to sound like a broken record, but... my status checker isn't working. XDManOfTheMinute wrote:Carbon, is yours still uppercase?
I don't expect anything from S, though. I have resigned myself to the thought of perhaps becoming the only Hamilton for whom the Hamilton was unnecessary as a lure away from YHS.
- carboncopyx
- Posts: 565
- Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2012 10:30 am
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
It'd actually be a bit funny if there were just no KB admits for the entire month of February (since tomorrow is the last day, anyway). Also a bit sad. But a bit funny, definitely.amonthofsundays wrote:Relax you are getting into Harvard fosho. KB hasn't admitted anyone since January.
Aaaaand my status checker is back up! I have that weird address updated to the longest version possible thing, but e-mail is still lowercase. Better than DLS, though. Pretty excited to see the second test of uppercase-to-lowercase meaning acceptance for you tomorrow, amonthofsundays!!
- ManOfTheMinute
- Posts: 1557
- Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 12:54 am
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
Haha you're ridiculous. I expect both SLS and HLS for you, so when I see you at ASW you owe me a drinkcarboncopyx wrote:I hate to sound like a broken record, but... my status checker isn't working. XDManOfTheMinute wrote:Carbon, is yours still uppercase?
I don't expect anything from S, though. I have resigned myself to the thought of perhaps becoming the only Hamilton for whom the Hamilton was unnecessary as a lure away from YHS.
-
- Posts: 278
- Joined: Wed Jun 20, 2012 2:10 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
.
Last edited by one_by_one on Fri Jul 17, 2015 1:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 180
- Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2011 3:36 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
Thanks! I'm pretty damn excited too! And my Harvard comment didn't imply I think you're not going to get SLS. Here is to an awesome next couple weeks for both of us!carboncopyx wrote:It'd actually be a bit funny if there were just no KB admits for the entire month of February (since tomorrow is the last day, anyway). Also a bit sad. But a bit funny, definitely.amonthofsundays wrote:Relax you are getting into Harvard fosho. KB hasn't admitted anyone since January.
Aaaaand my status checker is back up! I have that weird address updated to the longest version possible thing, but e-mail is still lowercase. Better than DLS, though. Pretty excited to see the second test of uppercase-to-lowercase meaning acceptance for you tomorrow, amonthofsundays!!
- carboncopyx
- Posts: 565
- Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2012 10:30 am
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
If we actually wind up at the ASWs for the same schools, I would be more than happy to buy you a drink! Everyone, rounds on me!ManOfTheMinute wrote:Haha you're ridiculous. I expect both SLS and HLS for you, so when I see you at ASW you owe me a drink
- ManOfTheMinute
- Posts: 1557
- Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 12:54 am
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
Yeah, everyone lets get drunk on carbon's dime! Yayyycarboncopyx wrote:If we actually wind up at the ASWs for the same schools, I would be more than happy to buy you a drink! Everyone, rounds on me!ManOfTheMinute wrote:Haha you're ridiculous. I expect both SLS and HLS for you, so when I see you at ASW you owe me a drink
-
- Posts: 171
- Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2012 10:51 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
I'm still stuck on late November complete with the status being "Your file has been submitted for review." I'm guessing it was an auto-reject but someone forgot to inform me?
EDIT: In the words of Jonah Hill, "fuck me, right?"
EDIT: In the words of Jonah Hill, "fuck me, right?"
Last edited by WalkingPlato on Wed Feb 27, 2013 11:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- carboncopyx
- Posts: 565
- Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2012 10:30 am
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
http://thoughtcatalog.com/2012/11-bad-h ... ople-have/ManOfTheMinute wrote:Yeah, everyone lets get drunk on carbon's dime! Yayyy
I am guilty of #1 so much, it's embarrassing. But great for everyone else!
Nah, they've already rejected people, so under review is still a good sign, as far as I am aware.WalkingPlato wrote:I'm still stuck on late November complete with the status being "Your file has been submitted for review." I'm guessing it was an auto-reject but someone forgot to inform me?
- ManOfTheMinute
- Posts: 1557
- Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 12:54 am
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
Hahah me too... Especially in Vegas. But I'm pretty sure it's better than #11carboncopyx wrote:http://thoughtcatalog.com/2012/11-bad-h ... ople-have/ManOfTheMinute wrote:Yeah, everyone lets get drunk on carbon's dime! Yayyy
I am guilty of #1 so much, it's embarrassing. But great for everyone else!
- Audeamus
- Posts: 430
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 10:28 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
i am guilty of #8ManOfTheMinute wrote:Hahah me too... Especially in Vegas. But I'm pretty sure it's better than #11carboncopyx wrote:http://thoughtcatalog.com/2012/11-bad-h ... ople-have/ManOfTheMinute wrote:Yeah, everyone lets get drunk on carbon's dime! Yayyy
I am guilty of #1 so much, it's embarrassing. But great for everyone else!
-
- Posts: 106
- Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2013 8:21 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
Looking through LSN, this year there are 42 acceptances reported, last year there was 65 total reported, and the year before 53 total reported. With those figures it suggests that this year we are at about 72% of admits - putting about 28% offers of admission still coming. According to TLS profile for stanford it appears they give out about 354 acceptances each year meaning about 99 acceptances remaining, plus a ton of dings & waitlists. I know this is rough figures, but probably a decent ball park estimate.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- HankBashir
- Posts: 536
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2013 3:01 am
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
#8 and #9, represent! My drunk tweets are unfortunately a thing of legend.ManOfTheMinute wrote:Hahah me too... Especially in Vegas. But I'm pretty sure it's better than #11carboncopyx wrote:http://thoughtcatalog.com/2012/11-bad-h ... ople-have/ManOfTheMinute wrote:Yeah, everyone lets get drunk on carbon's dime! Yayyy
I am guilty of #1 so much, it's embarrassing. But great for everyone else!
- carboncopyx
- Posts: 565
- Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2012 10:30 am
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
Hahahahahaha. Now I really want to just get all of you guys drunk at ASW (maybe for Stanford??) so I can watch the bad habits abound!
-
- Posts: 1695
- Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 2:42 am
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
Um, I like to get drunk, but I probably won't get into Stanford. Would it be weird if I just showed up?carboncopyx wrote:Hahahahahaha. Now I really want to just get all of you guys drunk at ASW (maybe for Stanford??) so I can watch the bad habits abound!
- carboncopyx
- Posts: 565
- Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2012 10:30 am
Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread
ohpobrecito wrote:Um, I like to get drunk, but I probably won't get into Stanford. Would it be weird if I just showed up?
Mean Girls--I had to.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login