Wake 2011 Forum
- jdemmitt
- Posts: 697
- Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2010 4:52 pm
Re: Wake 2011
Driving back to Raleigh now. Fly out Sunday. Woo
- wileyman02
- Posts: 30
- Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2010 11:55 pm
Re: Wake 2011
Moral_Midgetry wrote:Obviously, I am aware that Wisconsin and Wake are not bottom T1 schools. I was referring to you gloating about your acceptance at Tulane - like it matters to anyone. 150/3.92 - you'd almost definitely be paying sticker there or anywhere else decent.mss455 wrote:Dumbass syndrome afflictee - I got in Wisconsin, which is not a bottom T1 school like you're claiming - I wish you the best to get in at your WAKE !!!Moral_Midgetry wrote:In other words: I don't really care, yet I do really care.mss455 wrote:Errr I don't care what you all say --- p.s. ADD Tulane to my List of Acceptances - Thanks.
If it would make you feel BETTER if I said my life has NO meaning anymore because I did not get into Wake - here it goes: I am completely so awfully disappointed I did not get In Wake.
This ladies and gentlemen is why people go to law school, pay t14 prices for bottom end tier 1 schools, and end up hating their careers as indentured servants. In short, dumbass syndrome.
You are going to be a fantastic lawyer.
Dude, you sure talk a lot of shit for someone who needed two mulligans to get past the LSAT...
- charlesxavier
- Posts: 445
- Joined: Sun Aug 02, 2009 10:51 pm
Re: Wake 2011
Let's keep golf out of this.wileyman02 wrote:Dude, you sure talk a lot of shit for someone who needed two mulligans to get past the LSAT...
- jdemmitt
- Posts: 697
- Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2010 4:52 pm
Re: Wake 2011
+1charlesxavier wrote:Let's keep golf out of this.wileyman02 wrote:Dude, you sure talk a lot of shit for someone who needed two mulligans to get past the LSAT...
-
- Posts: 87
- Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2011 9:37 pm
Re: Wake 2011
I love it when there is a logical explanation for things. Thanks for letting me know that, now I don't have to spend all weekend trying to figure out why I didn't hear anything.jdemmitt wrote:The dean of admissions is sick right now, so that could be a reason.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- leidice
- Posts: 241
- Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 11:05 am
Re: Wake 2011
How do you get to know this secret information!?richis7 wrote:I love it when there is a logical explanation for things. Thanks for letting me know that, now I don't have to spend all weekend trying to figure out why I didn't hear anything.jdemmitt wrote:The dean of admissions is sick right now, so that could be a reason.
- AfroThunder1212
- Posts: 75
- Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2010 11:51 am
Re: Wake 2011
They told us at the scholarship open house yesterdayleidice wrote:How do you get to know this secret information!?richis7 wrote:I love it when there is a logical explanation for things. Thanks for letting me know that, now I don't have to spend all weekend trying to figure out why I didn't hear anything.jdemmitt wrote:The dean of admissions is sick right now, so that could be a reason.
- leidice
- Posts: 241
- Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 11:05 am
Re: Wake 2011
OH. hahaha. I thought he'd been keeping tabs on the deans of admission for law schools. That would have been BA.AfroThunder1212 wrote:They told us at the scholarship open house yesterdayleidice wrote:How do you get to know this secret information!?richis7 wrote:I love it when there is a logical explanation for things. Thanks for letting me know that, now I don't have to spend all weekend trying to figure out why I didn't hear anything.jdemmitt wrote:The dean of admissions is sick right now, so that could be a reason.
- moandersen
- Posts: 819
- Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2008 1:31 pm
Re: Wake 2011
just a fyi for those of you who come for open house.....
when observing a class, please resist the urge to raise your hand to answer a profs question because:
1. you dont know what you are talking about for two reasons
(a) you did not read the case
(b) you dont know the topic being covered
2. you make people think 'who the f is this guy, and why is he not letting us answer the question?'
3. you are observing a class, which emphasis on observe.
sorry for the numbers and subsections - i just finished outlining for a brief and for my property midterm. but in all sincerity, for the sake of those of us paying tuition, hold off on gunning until you are enrolled.
i know this may make me come off as a dick, any really im not. And I know most (all?) of you would never do this. I (as well as my other classmates) were just stunned and confused as to what happened.
when observing a class, please resist the urge to raise your hand to answer a profs question because:
1. you dont know what you are talking about for two reasons
(a) you did not read the case
(b) you dont know the topic being covered
2. you make people think 'who the f is this guy, and why is he not letting us answer the question?'
3. you are observing a class, which emphasis on observe.
sorry for the numbers and subsections - i just finished outlining for a brief and for my property midterm. but in all sincerity, for the sake of those of us paying tuition, hold off on gunning until you are enrolled.
i know this may make me come off as a dick, any really im not. And I know most (all?) of you would never do this. I (as well as my other classmates) were just stunned and confused as to what happened.
- Stonewall
- Posts: 392
- Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2011 1:19 am
Re: Wake 2011
that is absolutely hilarious. 0L ultra-gunner strikes againmoandersen wrote:just a fyi for those of you who come for open house.....
when observing a class, please resist the urge to raise your hand to answer a profs question because:
1. you dont know what you are talking about for two reasons
(a) you did not read the case
(b) you dont know the topic being covered
2. you make people think 'who the f is this guy, and why is he not letting us answer the question?'
3. you are observing a class, which emphasis on observe.
sorry for the numbers and subsections - i just finished outlining for a brief and for my property midterm. but in all sincerity, for the sake of those of us paying tuition, hold off on gunning until you are enrolled.
i know this may make me come off as a dick, any really im not. And I know most (all?) of you would never do this. I (as well as my other classmates) were just stunned and confused as to what happened.
- BlueDevil2007
- Posts: 32
- Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2010 1:46 am
Re: Wake 2011
moandersen wrote:just a fyi for those of you who come for open house.....
when observing a class, please resist the urge to raise your hand to answer a profs question because:
1. you dont know what you are talking about for two reasons
(a) you did not read the case
(b) you dont know the topic being covered
2. you make people think 'who the f is this guy, and why is he not letting us answer the question?'
3. you are observing a class, which emphasis on observe.
sorry for the numbers and subsections - i just finished outlining for a brief and for my property midterm. but in all sincerity, for the sake of those of us paying tuition, hold off on gunning until you are enrolled.
i know this may make me come off as a dick, any really im not. And I know most (all?) of you would never do this. I (as well as my other classmates) were just stunned and confused as to what happened.
It amazes me that anyone would do that. I think my goal as a 0L would be to NOT draw attention to myself while observing a class.
- Stonewall
- Posts: 392
- Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2011 1:19 am
Re: Wake 2011
^ you would think. And I really don't want that kid to possibly be in my class next year
- charlesxavier
- Posts: 445
- Joined: Sun Aug 02, 2009 10:51 pm
Re: Wake 2011
I observed a class last week and that seems to be a pretty accurate description of a few current students as well. There were no gunners but there were quite a few runners. Nobody wanted to answer the questions. It was a bit awkward.moandersen wrote: 1. you dont know what you are talking about for two reasons
(a) you did not read the case
(b) you dont know the topic being covered
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- jdemmitt
- Posts: 697
- Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2010 4:52 pm
Re: Wake 2011
Damn, gave away my secret.AfroThunder1212 wrote:They told us at the scholarship open house yesterdayleidice wrote:How do you get to know this secret information!?richis7 wrote:I love it when there is a logical explanation for things. Thanks for letting me know that, now I don't have to spend all weekend trying to figure out why I didn't hear anything.jdemmitt wrote:The dean of admissions is sick right now, so that could be a reason.
- edgarfigaro
- Posts: 244
- Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2010 4:53 pm
Re: Wake 2011
+1Stonewall wrote:^ you would think. And I really don't want that kid to possibly be in my class next year
- Relientkate
- Posts: 118
- Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 6:42 pm
Re: Wake 2011
My online status checker still says "electronic application received" after two weeks... is this normal?
- leidice
- Posts: 241
- Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 11:05 am
Re: Wake 2011
+1edgarfigaro wrote:+1Stonewall wrote:^ you would think. And I really don't want that kid to possibly be in my class next year
This person irritates me already.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- NCtoDC
- Posts: 542
- Joined: Sun Aug 01, 2010 11:48 pm
Re: Wake 2011
Well, since you submitted so late, it may not be too abnormal, as it is the peak application season...Relientkate wrote:My online status checker still says "electronic application received" after two weeks... is this normal?
I know mine didn't take that long though. The admissions office is super nice. If you drop them an email to inquire I'm sure they can let you know if everything is good to go.
-
- Posts: 30
- Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2011 12:59 pm
Re: Wake 2011
How long did it take you guys to find out about scholarships? I was admitted 1/31, and I haven't gotten an email from them yet. Should I be worried? None of the other people on LSN who were admitted on the same date have listed scholarship info.
-
- Posts: 72
- Joined: Sun Oct 31, 2010 5:01 pm
Re: Wake 2011
ladybuglove wrote:How long did it take you guys to find out about scholarships? I was admitted 1/31, and I haven't gotten an email from them yet. Should I be worried? None of the other people on LSN who were admitted on the same date have listed scholarship info.
I was notified within a week of admission. Granted, I was admitted about a week before the first (and IIRC thus far only) wave of scholarship offers were sent out. I'm sure Wake will send another wave of offers out eventually so I wouldn't be too worried. If you're really concerned you could call admissions and ask.
On a sidenote, anyone mind informing the rest of us what question the 0L tried to answer in class?
- NCtoDC
- Posts: 542
- Joined: Sun Aug 01, 2010 11:48 pm
Re: Wake 2011
As far as contacting admissions regarding scholarships....I have done this and received no response...as has another poster on here. I was also admitted 1/31.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 87
- Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2011 9:37 pm
Re: Wake 2011
I don't think it is abnormal. They wait until they have received a paper copy from LSAC to put you in review, so I assume that takes at least a week. Plus with the volume of apps they are getting, plus apparently being short staffed for part of last week, I don't think you should worry. For what it is worth i applied back in december (the 15th) got the status checker shortly after (2-3 days) and it took till january 1 for me to go in review (where I still am).Relientkate wrote:My online status checker still says "electronic application received" after two weeks... is this normal?
Best of luck!
- akili
- Posts: 1950
- Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 9:21 pm
Re: Wake 2011
I would wait before getting too anxious. I was admitted 12/10 and received scholarship info on 1/24.NCtoDC wrote:As far as contacting admissions regarding scholarships....I have done this and received no response...as has another poster on here. I was also admitted 1/31.
- jdemmitt
- Posts: 697
- Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2010 4:52 pm
Re: Wake 2011
One student asked about negotiating scholarships and they said they had no money until students started refusing offers. Maybe they were exaggerating.
- nicole88
- Posts: 118
- Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2010 7:50 pm
Re: Wake 2011
Yeah, you definitely just sound like a dick, and I'm sure Wake Fores would not appreciate you going on to a blog of perspective students and letting them get to know the douchebags that await at WF.moandersen wrote:just a fyi for those of you who come for open house.....
when observing a class, please resist the urge to raise your hand to answer a profs question because:
1. you dont know what you are talking about for two reasons
(a) you did not read the case
(b) you dont know the topic being covered
2. you make people think 'who the f is this guy, and why is he not letting us answer the question?'
3. you are observing a class, which emphasis on observe.
sorry for the numbers and subsections - i just finished outlining for a brief and for my property midterm. but in all sincerity, for the sake of those of us paying tuition, hold off on gunning until you are enrolled.
i know this may make me come off as a dick, any really im not. And I know most (all?) of you would never do this. I (as well as my other classmates) were just stunned and confused as to what happened.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login