The correct answer for this question is D: 'disputing the conditions under which a key term of her argument can be appropriately applied'. But B is so hard for me to eliminate.
I think James counters Maria's argument by re-define the implication of totalitarian: 'the ambition of state' rather than 'the actual degree of control'. Thus, answer B is also acceptable, since it offers an alternative explanation for the situation Maria describes.
Is there detail I've missed here?
Prepare for the LSAT or discuss it with others in this forum.
1 post • Page 1 of 1
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: HYPSM and 10 guests