PT16_S3_Q20 Maria vs James

Prepare for the LSAT or discuss it with others in this forum.

Posts: 20
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2017 10:55 am

PT16_S3_Q20 Maria vs James

Postby existence1943 » Wed Apr 04, 2018 10:26 pm


The correct answer for this question is D: 'disputing the conditions under which a key term of her argument can be appropriately applied'. But B is so hard for me to eliminate.

I think James counters Maria's argument by re-define the implication of totalitarian: 'the ambition of state' rather than 'the actual degree of control'. Thus, answer B is also acceptable, since it offers an alternative explanation for the situation Maria describes.

Is there detail I've missed here?


Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum�

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Exabot [Bot] and 8 guests