condtionality in assumption family questions

Prepare for the LSAT or discuss it with others in this forum.
User avatar

Posts: 717
Joined: Mon May 26, 2014 1:13 am

condtionality in assumption family questions

Postby ltowns1 » Thu Feb 26, 2015 2:35 pm

Hey guys, I have a question. When it comes to condtionality in stregthening, weakening, and flawed questions , what should I do first? So for example a question like #2 pt 24 section 3.. I got the logic, but I felt like I was lucky I got this answer. Where exactly did the weakeness of this argument come from, the suffucient condition, the premise above the conditional statement, or someplace else? On assumptions family questions that have conditionality in their PREMISES other than necessary/sufficient (ex:stregthening, weakening, flawed questions) what should I look to weaken?

Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum�

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests