LSAT CURVE OPINIONS

bodadeous
Posts: 2
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2006 6:41 pm

LSAT CURVE OPINIONS

Postby bodadeous » Sat Dec 02, 2006 9:04 pm

What do you guys predict the curve will be? the typical -10 = 170? A lot of people were put off by the first experimental, but maybe I am just making excuses since i was one of them and it won't lower the curve ... but i honestly think -11 to -12 will be 170

bodadeous
Posts: 2
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2006 6:41 pm

Postby bodadeous » Sat Dec 02, 2006 9:48 pm

COMMON PEOPLE SACK UP AND PUT WHAT YOU THINK

User avatar
LSATnooblet
Posts: 15
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 9:28 pm

Postby LSATnooblet » Sat Dec 02, 2006 9:53 pm

I think it'll either be a -9 or -10

dsin
Posts: 1
Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 9:24 pm

Postby dsin » Sat Dec 02, 2006 10:23 pm

What does -9 -10 etc.. mean?

The sept lsat admin a 150 was 59 questions correct, and a 160 was 75 or 77 questions correct.

zipfly
Posts: 1
Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 7:25 pm

Postby zipfly » Sat Dec 02, 2006 10:38 pm

dsin

just the number wrong for the curve....59 correct = -42/-41 etc. etc.

wallyw
Posts: 1
Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2006 7:17 pm

Postby wallyw » Sat Dec 02, 2006 10:47 pm

I'm gonna go out on a limb and say -12/-13=170 because that makes me feel better!

User avatar
Ribbit
Posts: 31
Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 8:25 pm

Postby Ribbit » Sat Dec 02, 2006 11:04 pm

I figure it will be a -10 = 170. We'll see. Hopefully I'm wrong.

spursfaninla
Posts: 7
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2006 4:10 pm

curve for today...

Postby spursfaninla » Sun Dec 03, 2006 12:18 am

here are the score needed to get a 170 going backwards from dec 05:
http://www.powerscore.com/lsat/help/cor ... rgeted.htm

d 05 d 99
93, 90, 90, 87, 90, 89, 91, 88, 88, 91, 89, 89, 88, 87, 87....
http://www.blueprintprep.com/resources2.php

Above are overlayed curves for each of 2005's released LSATs and the curve for the Dec. 2002 LSAT. One can see a clear progression, especially in the middle of the curves, where more correct answers are required to attain the same scaled score.

Whereas in the December 2002 LSAT, 72 right answers were required for a score of 160, in the December 2005 LSAT, 79 right answers were required. This means that test takers had to get 7 more questions right (out of 100) on the more recent test to get the same score. That's a massive variance compared with the 1 or 2 questions that LSATs have historically varied. Bottom line: The curve is getting more difficult. You need to get more questions right than previous test-takers to get the same score.

Eremite
Posts: 22
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 5:57 pm

Postby Eremite » Mon Dec 04, 2006 12:43 pm

True, however (and this is going to sound crazy) I think the LSAT is getting easier. When I take those steep-curved tests from the early aughts I usually miss more. I think that the later LSATs take a more even-keeled approach and aim for the -10=170 curve.

Fingersxed
Posts: 5
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 7:13 pm

Postby Fingersxed » Mon Dec 04, 2006 1:15 pm

sad
Last edited by Fingersxed on Wed May 02, 2007 2:29 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
the lsat hax0r
Posts: 31
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 1:17 am

Postby the lsat hax0r » Mon Dec 04, 2006 1:20 pm

http://www.princetonreview.com/law/test ... AT-REPORTS

Based on this, I would think a -10 = 170.

spursfaninla
Posts: 7
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2006 4:10 pm

Postby spursfaninla » Mon Dec 04, 2006 6:54 pm

Did anyone see Kaplan rate this LSAT? I didn't see anything from them. The Princeton one saying it was slightly harder than the others from this year was VERY reassuring...

Teflon1974
Posts: 79
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 2:02 am

Postby Teflon1974 » Mon Dec 04, 2006 7:57 pm

I wouldn't place too much stock in the Princeton Review Report.

From the September 2006 Report:
As always, test forms for the September 2006 LSAT included an experimental (unscored) section. On most test forms, the experimental section appeared in Section 2. Be aware, however, that LSAC often administers a few selected forms with identical scored sections, but with their experimental sections in a different location. Ratings of this administration placed its difficulty slightly above that of other recent exams. Princeton Review students report being pleased with their overall performance.

From the December 2006 Report:
As always, test forms for the December 2006 LSAT included an experimental (unscored) section. On most test forms, the experimental section appeared in Section 1. Be aware, however, that LSAC often administers a few selected forms with identical scored sections, but with their experimental sections in a different location. Ratings of this administration placed its difficulty slightly above that of other recent exams. Princeton Review students report being pleased with their overall performance.

They played the same song for June, although they did say that February's was slightly easier. These reports are too generalized and non-specific to have much meaning.

rsuelzer
Posts: 22
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2010 5:10 am

Re: LSAT CURVE OPINIONS

Postby rsuelzer » Mon Apr 26, 2010 4:56 am

I thought that LSAT curve was based upon the results over the last three years. So it is possible for everyone to get a 180, but it makes the curve harder for the following year.

User avatar
Mr. Smith
Posts: 63
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 2:51 pm

Re: LSAT CURVE OPINIONS

Postby Mr. Smith » Mon Apr 26, 2010 6:02 am

I believe that the curve is getting looser, but that's just as good of a guess as anyone's.

I think it has to do with the pool of unprepared/ill-prepared test-takers increasing exponentially in response to the recession.

User avatar
tartugas
Posts: 51
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 10:43 pm

Re: LSAT CURVE OPINIONS

Postby tartugas » Mon Apr 26, 2010 7:33 am

Why even worry about the curve? It's out of your control. If you ask me (and you sorta did by posting this q), I think it's a waste of energy to even think about the curve. Spend your time studying and aggressively attack the areas you feel weak in. If you walk in confident that you can get 10 wrong and still be ok then you're walking in with the wrong attitude.

IMHO, of course.

tomwatts
Posts: 1551
Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2009 12:01 am

Re: LSAT CURVE OPINIONS

Postby tomwatts » Mon Apr 26, 2010 3:03 pm

rsuelzer wrote:I thought that LSAT curve was based upon the results over the last three years. So it is possible for everyone to get a 180, but it makes the curve harder for the following year.

No, it's based on results over the last 19 years. The test is still equated by the same standards as it was back in 1991, when the current LSAT debuted, and it's never needed to be recentered, nor have scores drifted. (This is, by the way, astonishing when compared with other major standardized admissions tests.)

Basically, they take a bunch of experimental sections and slap them together to make an LSAT. Those experimental sections could be from 1992. They could be from 2009. They could be a mishmash of different years. But the scoring grid is based on historical student performance (whenever it happened) on those sections.

They do talk about percentiles from the last three years. I don't think that figures into the equating process, though.

vivalalsat
Posts: 16
Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 3:10 pm

Re: LSAT CURVE OPINIONS

Postby vivalalsat » Mon Apr 26, 2010 7:23 pm

Why do people worry about and analyze the curve so much? You can't control it. Do something more productive please.

User avatar
kaydish21
Posts: 300
Joined: Thu Feb 18, 2010 3:51 pm

Re: LSAT CURVE OPINIONS

Postby kaydish21 » Mon Apr 26, 2010 7:38 pm

tomwatts wrote:
rsuelzer wrote:I thought that LSAT curve was based upon the results over the last three years. So it is possible for everyone to get a 180, but it makes the curve harder for the following year.

No, it's based on results over the last 19 years. The test is still equated by the same standards as it was back in 1991, when the current LSAT debuted, and it's never needed to be recentered, nor have scores drifted. (This is, by the way, astonishing when compared with other major standardized admissions tests.)

Basically, they take a bunch of experimental sections and slap them together to make an LSAT. Those experimental sections could be from 1992. They could be from 2009. They could be a mishmash of different years. But the scoring grid is based on historical student performance (whenever it happened) on those sections.

They do talk about percentiles from the last three years. I don't think that figures into the equating process, though.


This is the right idea, but it goes too far and is a bit too strong. They do not replicate entire experimental sections on future tests and the types of questions have evolved quite a bit since 1991. Experimental sections test specific questions on LR, and specific puzzles and passages on these respective sections. It does not make sense for LSAC to throw a whole off the wall experimental section in a test as experienced testers will quickly see this and it would be harder to interpret the results as their would be less validity in the section's scores. The way experimental works is they look at a specific question or a new twist on an existing question type and see if the test takers still get it correct at the same rate as other sections. They then have a huge database of experimentals they can use and future experimentals are used to keep up the variety of question types in this database. There is some repetition among experimentals the same way there is some repetition among non experimentals.

Sorry if this is all a bit convoluted, my head is pounding from allergies or something. Hope the brief overview helps.

JurisDoctorate
Posts: 224
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 5:22 am

Re: LSAT CURVE OPINIONS

Postby JurisDoctorate » Sun Oct 10, 2010 10:06 am

Mr. Smith wrote:I believe that the curve is getting looser, but that's just as good of a guess as anyone's.

I think it has to do with the pool of unprepared/ill-prepared test-takers increasing exponentially in response to the recession.


This is my sense. I don't feel that the curve is set a priori, I feel it is made after the look at the distributions of correct answers. Since law school applications are up a bunch, and those who come late to the party are less likely to be well-prepared, the curve is getting more generous. Why else do you think the curve is getting looser and looser?

A lot of people say it's because those tests were hard; however, they are saying this after the fact. A lot of sage members are saying that people actually thought those tests were easy, at the time, and were predicting -10 and -11.

My belief is the curve will only get looser and looser; get ready for a -15 on this test.
Last edited by JurisDoctorate on Sun Oct 10, 2010 10:13 am, edited 1 time in total.

littlepixie11
Posts: 58
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 5:05 pm

Re: LSAT CURVE OPINIONS

Postby littlepixie11 » Sun Oct 10, 2010 10:11 am

JurisDoctorate wrote:
Mr. Smith wrote:I believe that the curve is getting looser, but that's just as good of a guess as anyone's.

I think it has to do with the pool of unprepared/ill-prepared test-takers increasing exponentially in response to the recession.


This is my sense. I don't feel that the curve is set a priori, I feel it is made after the look at the distributions of correct answers. Since law school applications are up a bunch, and those who come late to the party are less likely to be well-prepared, the curve is getting more generous. Why else do you think the curve is getting looser and looser?

A lot of people say it's because those tests were hard; however, they are saying this after the fact. A lot of sage members are saying that people actually thought those tests were easy, at the time, and were predicting -10 and -11.

My belief is the curve will only get looser and looser; get ready for a -15 on this test.

Hm Im not too sure about that. Dec 09 gave a good curve, and June had a smaller curve. Going by that Id say its going to be -12 or -11, and probably -11. Definitely not -9 or whatever.

User avatar
DrackedaryMaster
Posts: 181
Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2010 5:11 pm

Re: LSAT CURVE OPINIONS

Postby DrackedaryMaster » Sun Oct 10, 2010 10:17 am

I was leaning at -11 yesterday but now more leaning towards -12.

Go look up the Oct 2008 TLS threads and read for yourself what those testers who had our RC as their experimental. Check the profiles/statistics of those who thought it was hard and compare to what they announced in the score release. Indications are that they struggled with it, which is surprising.

Do the same thing in the Feb 2009 threads that had our LG as experimental. They can't help us determine a curve, but many of those people were relieved it was an experimental and the "easier" LG counted.

Do the same same in the Dec 2009 in regards to the LR experimental containing the Journalist Q. Those people didn't like that LR section and it didn't make matters all that great for them considering that test as a whole was a beast.

So I'm leaning much more now that 89/90 will be 170.

JurisDoctorate
Posts: 224
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 5:22 am

Re: LSAT CURVE OPINIONS

Postby JurisDoctorate » Sun Oct 10, 2010 10:22 am

Here's the thing, I think the unprepared students are less likely to take the June test. They just finished their undergrad, they are still on their "well-deserved" vacations and they don't start thinking about their future until the fall.

Mark my words, the curve is going to be huge. And, as one poster dreaded, it'll be -20 in no time. However, you'll then need like a minimum of 175 to get into CCN.

Times are a changin'




Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: 34iplaw and 6 guests