You could get 180 on June 8, 2009, without any more practice. But not very likely.tj1320 wrote: I started out with a 140 on the December '08 test. I recently scored a 144 on the February '93 test (PT #7). Given enough time (maybe a year or two of dedicated 3-4 hour per day studying) I think I could get a 180 or very close to it.
How I got a perfect score on the LSAT. Forum
- chewdak
- Posts: 106
- Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2009 5:54 pm
Re: How I got a perfect score on the LSAT.
- RVP11
- Posts: 2774
- Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2007 6:32 pm
Re: How I got a perfect score on the LSAT.
Sorry, but that's just delusional. The test is a lot harder than that.tj1320 wrote:I started out with a 140 on the December '08 test. I recently scored a 144 on the February '93 test (PT #7). Given enough time (maybe a year or two of dedicated 3-4 hour per day studying) I think I could get a 180 or very close to it
-
- Posts: 39
- Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2009 3:53 pm
Re: How I got a perfect score on the LSAT.
I think at some point you get diminishing returns. Like, just because you study for 10 years for example, doesn't mean you will get a 180. LSAT study is not about how long you study, but how effective your studying is.JSUVA2012 wrote:Sorry, but that's just delusional. The test is a lot harder than that.tj1320 wrote:I started out with a 140 on the December '08 test. I recently scored a 144 on the February '93 test (PT #7). Given enough time (maybe a year or two of dedicated 3-4 hour per day studying) I think I could get a 180 or very close to it
-
- Posts: 39
- Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 10:30 pm
Re: How I got a perfect score on the LSAT.
this is a great thread. i would love to hear from anyone else who made a 175+ (as obviously there's few 180's out there).
-
- Posts: 84
- Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2009 7:30 pm
Re: How I got a perfect score on the LSAT.
Does anyone else feel that there is an innate score cap that you can get on this test? Like if you start at 140, you probably wont get much higher than a 160. If you start at 165, 175+ could be possible.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- IHaveDietMoxie
- Posts: 137
- Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 3:54 am
Re: How I got a perfect score on the LSAT.
No, I think different types of intelligence can yield equally poor scores, especially at the start. Some people, me for instance, can start in the 150s (I never took it timed when I was so dismal at it, but I imagine this is where I was) and progress via smart and hard work to the 170's. The scoring system of the lsat is not in any way a true measure of intelligence....it merely charts a very narrow range of specific skills that may or may not be possible to develop in any given person. To arbitrarily say that someone can't gain a certain number of points is ridiculous. It really depends on why you're scoring so low; people take the scores they get to heart way too easily, especially at the beginning. If you think about it, the reality is that in any given poor score, its merely a few problems that you simply weren't equipped to handle. For some people, these skills may be developed, for others their intelligence/study habits preclude it. But saying that nobody can expect a big change in their score is simply not true. I do agree, however, that studying for X amount of months is meaningless unless you are studying with purpose...if you're just chomping through tests without analysis for 12 months, you would have been better off studying for a month with serious consideration, obviously.
-
- Posts: 33
- Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2008 6:01 pm
Re: How I got a perfect score on the LSAT.
This. Though I do think, based on my own experience, that it's easier to practice up logic games than it is reading comprehension/logical reasoning. I was terrible at logic games when I first started studying, but used the LG Bible and went through old practice tests like a mad thing for a month or so, and got them all right on test day. Reading comp/logical reasoning, on the other hand, really does seem (at least in my limited sample of people I know who've taken the LSAT) to take a lot longer to work up. Ideal really would be the OP's suggestion of reading dense, difficult material on a regular basis, and starting 6 months to a year before the exam.IHaveDietMoxie wrote:I think different types of intelligence can yield equally poor scores, especially at the start. Some people, me for instance, can start in the 150s (I never took it timed when I was so dismal at it, but I imagine this is where I was) and progress via smart and hard work to the 170's. The scoring system of the lsat is not in any way a true measure of intelligence....it merely charts a very narrow range of specific skills that may or may not be possible to develop in any given person.
I think part of the reason I scored as well as I did (179) was because reading comp and logical reasoning were already strengths for me (I read a lot, and I read quickly), and my weakness was a section that I could improve upon with a month or two of concentrated work.
-
- Posts: 84
- Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2009 7:30 pm
Re: How I got a perfect score on the LSAT.
I think the LG Bible is great, but I know many people who also feel that this is not enough in order to improve.shuchong wrote:This. Though I do think, based on my own experience, that it's easier to practice up logic games than it is reading comprehension/logical reasoning. I was terrible at logic games when I first started studying, but used the LG Bible and went through old practice tests like a mad thing for a month or so, and got them all right on test day. Reading comp/logical reasoning, on the other hand, really does seem (at least in my limited sample of people I know who've taken the LSAT) to take a lot longer to work up. Ideal really would be the OP's suggestion of reading dense, difficult material on a regular basis, and starting 6 months to a year before the exam.IHaveDietMoxie wrote:I think different types of intelligence can yield equally poor scores, especially at the start. Some people, me for instance, can start in the 150s (I never took it timed when I was so dismal at it, but I imagine this is where I was) and progress via smart and hard work to the 170's. The scoring system of the lsat is not in any way a true measure of intelligence....it merely charts a very narrow range of specific skills that may or may not be possible to develop in any given person.
I think part of the reason I scored as well as I did (179) was because reading comp and logical reasoning were already strengths for me (I read a lot, and I read quickly), and my weakness was a section that I could improve upon with a month or two of concentrated work.
-
- Posts: 33
- Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2008 6:01 pm
Re: How I got a perfect score on the LSAT.
Yeah... maybe I didn't put enough emphasis on the whole going through PTs like a mad thing. I ended up photocopying the LG sections of almost every practice test I had (30 or so... I kept a few untouched so that I'd have full, new PTs for diagnostics), putting them all in a binder, and just working through them, then going back to see what I got wrong and why. I used scratch paper instead of writing on the photocopies, which was key, because it meant that once I'd worked my way through the binder, I could start again at the beginning. (Yay for having a terrible memory! Since games don't stick in my head, it was almost like having an unlimited supply of questions.)allison34363 wrote:I think the LG Bible is great, but I know many people who also feel that this is not enough in order to improve.
-
- Posts: 84
- Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2009 7:30 pm
Re: How I got a perfect score on the LSAT.
That is a good idea, to redo the same questions that give you trouble, but dont you remember the key inferences and deductions and thus it establishes a false sense of confidence?shuchong wrote:Yeah... maybe I didn't put enough emphasis on the whole going through PTs like a mad thing. I ended up photocopying the LG sections of almost every practice test I had (30 or so... I kept a few untouched so that I'd have full, new PTs for diagnostics), putting them all in a binder, and just working through them, then going back to see what I got wrong and why. I used scratch paper instead of writing on the photocopies, which was key, because it meant that once I'd worked my way through the binder, I could start again at the beginning. (Yay for having a terrible memory! Since games don't stick in my head, it was almost like having an unlimited supply of questions.)allison34363 wrote:I think the LG Bible is great, but I know many people who also feel that this is not enough in order to improve.
-
- Posts: 33
- Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2008 6:01 pm
Re: How I got a perfect score on the LSAT.
It could be that I'm just especially forgetful, but I felt like I had enough practice tests that by the time I got to the end of my binder-o-games, I really had forgotten what was at the beginning of it.allison34363 wrote:That is a good idea, to redo the same questions that give you trouble, but dont you remember the key inferences and deductions and thus it establishes a false sense of confidence?
I can see how familiarity with key inferences would be a problem for some people. I could never have studied for RC this way because I remember what I read. My brain is just not wired for logic games though: I tend to forget the specifics pretty quickly, though thankfully overall strategies stuck with me

I also set aside a few practice exams (as in, I didn't photocopy the games sections and put them in my binder), so that I had complete never-before-seen exams to take as the actual LSAT neared. Taking those in the two weeks or so leading up to test day helped reassure me that I actually had learned games strategy instead of just having memorized the games in my binder.
-
- Posts: 39
- Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2009 3:53 pm
Re: How I got a perfect score on the LSAT.
I really like that idea of photocopying the problems. Will prob help you resell it too after you are all done with the LSAT.shuchong wrote:It could be that I'm just especially forgetful, but I felt like I had enough practice tests that by the time I got to the end of my binder-o-games, I really had forgotten what was at the beginning of it.allison34363 wrote:That is a good idea, to redo the same questions that give you trouble, but dont you remember the key inferences and deductions and thus it establishes a false sense of confidence?
I can see how familiarity with key inferences would be a problem for some people. I could never have studied for RC this way because I remember what I read. My brain is just not wired for logic games though: I tend to forget the specifics pretty quickly, though thankfully overall strategies stuck with me![]()
I also set aside a few practice exams (as in, I didn't photocopy the games sections and put them in my binder), so that I had complete never-before-seen exams to take as the actual LSAT neared. Taking those in the two weeks or so leading up to test day helped reassure me that I actually had learned games strategy instead of just having memorized the games in my binder.
-
- Posts: 84
- Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2009 7:30 pm
Re: How I got a perfect score on the LSAT.
What was the name of the general logic tutorial book again that was recommended?
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Pankun
- Posts: 76
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 2:18 pm
Re: How I got a perfect score on the LSAT.
Yeah but some games are complete repeats with names/symbols changed. For example: PT13, Gm 3 and PT 32, Gm 1. Its so blatantly similar that the makers clearly got lazy, took an old test, and made a few minimal changes.allison34363 wrote:That is a good idea, to redo the same questions that give you trouble, but dont you remember the key inferences and deductions and thus it establishes a false sense of confidence?shuchong wrote:Yeah... maybe I didn't put enough emphasis on the whole going through PTs like a mad thing. I ended up photocopying the LG sections of almost every practice test I had (30 or so... I kept a few untouched so that I'd have full, new PTs for diagnostics), putting them all in a binder, and just working through them, then going back to see what I got wrong and why. I used scratch paper instead of writing on the photocopies, which was key, because it meant that once I'd worked my way through the binder, I could start again at the beginning. (Yay for having a terrible memory! Since games don't stick in my head, it was almost like having an unlimited supply of questions.)allison34363 wrote:I think the LG Bible is great, but I know many people who also feel that this is not enough in order to improve.
- Hook 'Em
- Posts: 152
- Joined: Fri Dec 26, 2008 1:00 pm
Re: How I got a perfect score on the LSAT.
Future gunner?Pankun wrote:Yeah but some games are complete repeats with names/symbols changed. For example: PT13, Gm 3 and PT 32, Gm 1. Its so blatantly similar that the makers clearly got lazy, took an old test, and made a few minimal changes.allison34363 wrote:That is a good idea, to redo the same questions that give you trouble, but dont you remember the key inferences and deductions and thus it establishes a false sense of confidence?shuchong wrote:Yeah... maybe I didn't put enough emphasis on the whole going through PTs like a mad thing. I ended up photocopying the LG sections of almost every practice test I had (30 or so... I kept a few untouched so that I'd have full, new PTs for diagnostics), putting them all in a binder, and just working through them, then going back to see what I got wrong and why. I used scratch paper instead of writing on the photocopies, which was key, because it meant that once I'd worked my way through the binder, I could start again at the beginning. (Yay for having a terrible memory! Since games don't stick in my head, it was almost like having an unlimited supply of questions.)allison34363 wrote:I think the LG Bible is great, but I know many people who also feel that this is not enough in order to improve.

-
- Posts: 67
- Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2008 3:33 am
Re: How I got a perfect score on the LSAT.
There's really only so many different LGs they can create. I mean they use the same types of setups and questions anyway. They just change the game to try and trick people from finding the underlying pattern. For example, one game is 8 lightbulbs, the next is 7 taxi cabs.Pankun wrote:Yeah but some games are complete repeats with names/symbols changed. For example: PT13, Gm 3 and PT 32, Gm 1. Its so blatantly similar that the makers clearly got lazy, took an old test, and made a few minimal changes.allison34363 wrote:That is a good idea, to redo the same questions that give you trouble, but dont you remember the key inferences and deductions and thus it establishes a false sense of confidence?shuchong wrote:Yeah... maybe I didn't put enough emphasis on the whole going through PTs like a mad thing. I ended up photocopying the LG sections of almost every practice test I had (30 or so... I kept a few untouched so that I'd have full, new PTs for diagnostics), putting them all in a binder, and just working through them, then going back to see what I got wrong and why. I used scratch paper instead of writing on the photocopies, which was key, because it meant that once I'd worked my way through the binder, I could start again at the beginning. (Yay for having a terrible memory! Since games don't stick in my head, it was almost like having an unlimited supply of questions.)allison34363 wrote:I think the LG Bible is great, but I know many people who also feel that this is not enough in order to improve.
-
- Posts: 84
- Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2009 7:30 pm
Re: How I got a perfect score on the LSAT.
I agree with you for ordering games, but for all other ones the possibilities are endless
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- bobkjohnson
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Mon May 11, 2009 2:48 am
Re: How I got a perfect score on the LSAT.
I haven't taken the LSAT yet, but I took a formal logic class and studied informal logic. For the most part the stuff that I learned in the class, albeit it was more so formulas, it helped in my studying. I understand the Logic sections so much more now then when i took a practice test Sophomore year of College.JDewey wrote: 2) Pick up a good book on INFORMAL logic. I hear people saying that formal logic important, believe me, for this test INFORMAL logic is actually what you want to study. I think people are confusing the two. I am particularly fond of "Informal Logic: A handbook for critical argument" by Douglas N. Walton.
-
- Posts: 84
- Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2009 7:30 pm
Re: How I got a perfect score on the LSAT.
The most logic used on the LSAT is contrapositives. Agree or disagree?bobkjohnson wrote:I haven't taken the LSAT yet, but I took a formal logic class and studied informal logic. For the most part the stuff that I learned in the class, albeit it was more so formulas, it helped in my studying. I understand the Logic sections so much more now then when i took a practice test Sophomore year of College.JDewey wrote: 2) Pick up a good book on INFORMAL logic. I hear people saying that formal logic important, believe me, for this test INFORMAL logic is actually what you want to study. I think people are confusing the two. I am particularly fond of "Informal Logic: A handbook for critical argument" by Douglas N. Walton.
- IWantUWO
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 12:21 am
Re: How I got a perfect score on the LSAT.
I would agree. I would also say they test you A LOT on necessary and sufficient conditions. Particularly, seeing you can distinguish mistaken negations or reversals and not make that error. I find the more I do games, the less I want to diagram and just work with the statements in my head. Games have moved from tons of diagramming to almost an exercise in short term memory.allison34363 wrote:The most logic used on the LSAT is contrapositives. Agree or disagree?bobkjohnson wrote:I haven't taken the LSAT yet, but I took a formal logic class and studied informal logic. For the most part the stuff that I learned in the class, albeit it was more so formulas, it helped in my studying. I understand the Logic sections so much more now then when i took a practice test Sophomore year of College.JDewey wrote: 2) Pick up a good book on INFORMAL logic. I hear people saying that formal logic important, believe me, for this test INFORMAL logic is actually what you want to study. I think people are confusing the two. I am particularly fond of "Informal Logic: A handbook for critical argument" by Douglas N. Walton.
- idiothek
- Posts: 45
- Joined: Fri Apr 10, 2009 4:18 pm
Re: How I got a perfect score on the LSAT.
disagree. it also uses material implications, hypothetical syllogisms, modus ponens, modus tollens, de morgan's, and disjunctinve syllogisms.allison34363 wrote: The most logic used on the LSAT is contrapositives. Agree or disagree?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 2:06 pm
Re: How I got a perfect score on the LSAT.
idiothek wrote:disagree. it also uses material implications, hypothetical syllogisms, modus ponens, modus tollens, de morgan's, and disjunctinve syllogisms.allison34363 wrote: The most logic used on the LSAT is contrapositives. Agree or disagree?
Might you be so kind as to elaborate on the following...
- idiothek
- Posts: 45
- Joined: Fri Apr 10, 2009 4:18 pm
Re: How I got a perfect score on the LSAT.
i've had to use these at some point or another.stare-decises wrote:idiothek wrote:disagree. it also uses material implications, hypothetical syllogisms, modus ponens, modus tollens, de morgan's, and disjunctinve syllogisms.allison34363 wrote: The most logic used on the LSAT is contrapositives. Agree or disagree?
Might you be so kind as to elaborate on the following...
/:. = 'therefore' or 'it is logically entailed that'
~ = not
v = or
& = and
x->y = if x, then y
material implication:
a -> b
/:. ~a v b
and
~a v b
/:. a->b
hypothetical syllogism:
a->b
b->c
/:. a->c
modus ponens:
a->b
a
/:. b
modus tollens:
a->b
~b
/:. ~a
de morgan's
~(a&b)
/:. ~a v ~b
and
~(a v b)
/:. ~a & ~b
dysjunctive syllogism
a v b
~a
/:. b
all of this stuff comes almost straight from copi's symbolic logic.
-
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2009 6:21 pm
Re: How I got a perfect score on the LSAT.
I took OP's advice and have been casually reading through this book. It's an excellent supplement to LSAT studying. The vast majority of it is directly relevant to LR questions on the LSAT; his breakdowns of each logical fallacy are detailed and step-by-step. His taxonomy actually *adds* to an understanding of how the fallacy works and is never employed excessively or without purpose (cough ... powerscore ... cough). He gives tons of examples that read very much like LR stimuli.JDewey wrote: 2) Pick up a good book on INFORMAL logic. I hear people saying that formal logic important, believe me, for this test INFORMAL logic is actually what you want to study. I think people are confusing the two. I am particularly fond of "Informal Logic: A handbook for critical argument" by Douglas N. Walton.
If you're looking supplemental materials for extra lsat prep, the 2 best sources I've seen are GetPrepped's Ace the Logic Games for LGs and Walton's handbook for LR.
-
- Posts: 39
- Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 10:30 pm
Re: How I got a perfect score on the LSAT.
im on page 80 so far, how about you? it's been very interesting so far jst because i enjoy reading about argumentation, but i haven't gotten anything so far that has been of use to me for LSAT purposes, but i think someone mentioned that stuff is later in the book.Sesame_Jesus wrote:I took OP's advice and have been casually reading through this book. It's an excellent supplement to LSAT studying. The vast majority of it is directly relevant to LR questions on the LSAT; his breakdowns of each logical fallacy are detailed and step-by-step. His taxonomy actually *adds* to an understanding of how the fallacy works and is never employed excessively or without purpose (cough ... powerscore ... cough). He gives tons of examples that read very much like LR stimuli.JDewey wrote: 2) Pick up a good book on INFORMAL logic. I hear people saying that formal logic important, believe me, for this test INFORMAL logic is actually what you want to study. I think people are confusing the two. I am particularly fond of "Informal Logic: A handbook for critical argument" by Douglas N. Walton.
If you're looking supplemental materials for extra lsat prep, the 2 best sources I've seen are GetPrepped's Ace the Logic Games for LGs and Walton's handbook for LR.
btw, can you expound about getprepped's ace the logic games? i've never heard of it.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login