Feb Waiters: is TODAY the DAY? [New Poll] Forum
- dusters
- Posts: 168
- Joined: Wed Jun 20, 2012 8:12 pm
Re: Feb Waiters
I also had lr rc lr lr lg. Thought section 3 was the easiest and 4 the toughest. If I had to guess a curve it would be 9 or 10. For some reason the last logic game tripped me up
- LSLovely173
- Posts: 33
- Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2012 5:35 pm
Re: Feb Waiters
Curves and percentiles aren't broadcasted to us for the Feb test, right?ws81086n wrote:Are the people voting -7 serious or just being assholes? I'll be the first to say I think we're looking at a tight curve, but -7 is an absurd projection. Range is definitely -9 to -12, 10 and 11 being the most likely, with 10 more likely than 11.
-
- Posts: 313
- Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2012 9:47 pm
Re: Feb Waiters
Correct. But we can still speculate about it, and I would add that..... Reasonable Speculation---->Not thinking the curve is -7, Thinking the Curve is -7---->Unreasonable SpeculationLSLovely173 wrote:Curves and percentiles aren't broadcasted to us for the Feb test, right?ws81086n wrote:Are the people voting -7 serious or just being assholes? I'll be the first to say I think we're looking at a tight curve, but -7 is an absurd projection. Range is definitely -9 to -12, 10 and 11 being the most likely, with 10 more likely than 11.
- seahawk32
- Posts: 294
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2011 3:19 pm
Re: Feb Waiters
Can someone explain to me the significance of the curve?
- finnandjake2
- Posts: 170
- Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2012 1:41 am
Re: Feb Waiters
The number of questions you would have to get wrong to get a 170.seahawk32 wrote:Can someone explain to me the significance of the curve?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Jcastro1
- Posts: 119
- Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2012 6:45 pm
Re: Feb Waiters
no one else with LG-RC-LR-LR-RC?!
- finnandjake2
- Posts: 170
- Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2012 1:41 am
Re: Feb Waiters
RC-LR-RC-LG-LR
I can't remember if the bebop was 1st or 3rd for me... could someone who didn't have experimental RC say in a word the topics of the other RC passages. Was there a land rights comparative question?
My guess is -10 curve. LG was pretty straightforward and LR was moderately difficult.
I can't remember if the bebop was 1st or 3rd for me... could someone who didn't have experimental RC say in a word the topics of the other RC passages. Was there a land rights comparative question?
My guess is -10 curve. LG was pretty straightforward and LR was moderately difficult.
-
- Posts: 78
- Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2012 2:41 pm
Re: Feb Waiters
I had LR (26) RC (27) LR (25) LR (26) LG (23).....if you had that order im positive the experiential was either the 1st or 4th section, hoping its the 1st cuz i found it somewhat difficult and odd...
- eav1277
- Posts: 378
- Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2012 9:58 am
Re: Feb Waiters
I agree with the thriller here.TheThriller wrote:shut your mouth.ws81086n wrote:LR-RC-LR-LR-LG here. Felt fantastic about LR 1 (26), thought RC was a bit of a challenge, felt solid but not as good about the remaining LR, and thought LG was quite manageable, though I was absolutely exhausted throughout. I think the curve will be tight....
Last edited by eav1277 on Sat Feb 09, 2013 7:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- eav1277
- Posts: 378
- Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2012 9:58 am
Re: Feb Waiters
You're right (because someone with only two lr's had a 26 and a 25 section)JDot wrote:I had LR (26) RC (27) LR (25) LR (26) LG (23).....if you had that order im positive the experiential was either the 1st or 4th section, hoping its the 1st cuz i found it somewhat difficult and odd...
- 2x2Matrix
- Posts: 119
- Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2012 11:37 am
Re: Feb Waiters
I thought we still get percentiles?ws81086n wrote:Correct. But we can still speculate about it, and I would add that..... Reasonable Speculation---->Not thinking the curve is -7, Thinking the Curve is -7---->Unreasonable SpeculationLSLovely173 wrote:Curves and percentiles aren't broadcasted to us for the Feb test, right?ws81086n wrote:Are the people voting -7 serious or just being assholes? I'll be the first to say I think we're looking at a tight curve, but -7 is an absurd projection. Range is definitely -9 to -12, 10 and 11 being the most likely, with 10 more likely than 11.
-
- Posts: 4155
- Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2011 6:24 am
Re: Feb Waiters
Last edited by rebexness on Mon Feb 09, 2015 6:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- TheThriller
- Posts: 2282
- Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2012 10:12 pm
Re: Feb Waiters
ight thanksrebexness wrote:Thriller, i think the chat-ban is in effect for waiters also.
Probably wanna edit and do that shit by PM.
-
- Posts: 313
- Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2012 9:47 pm
Re: Feb Waiters
Not me...I was LR-RC-LR-LR-LG. Hadn't seen anyone else mention the form you had either. Probs cuz you took it across the Atlantic, ya tommyJcastro1 wrote:no one else with LG-RC-LR-LR-RC?!
-
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Sat Feb 09, 2013 5:56 pm
Re: Feb Waiters
I had lr-Rc-lr-lr-lg.
Mod edit
Can someone comment on which was experimental from that info?
Mod edit
Can someone comment on which was experimental from that info?
-
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2012 7:15 pm
Re: Feb Waiters
Do we get any of the lsat documents and if not do the icons turn grey when they start releasing scores like the other tests?
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- eav1277
- Posts: 378
- Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2012 9:58 am
Re: Feb Waiters
Seems like a lot of ppl had LR-RC-LR-LR-LGws81086n wrote:Not me...I was LR-RC-LR-LR-LG. Hadn't seen anyone else mention the form you had either. Probs cuz you took it across the Atlantic, ya tommyJcastro1 wrote:no one else with LG-RC-LR-LR-RC?!
- eav1277
- Posts: 378
- Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2012 9:58 am
Re: Feb Waiters
So drinking, bonfire, target practice, sleeping? What does everyone have planned?
-
- Posts: 313
- Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2012 9:47 pm
Re: Feb Waiters
TLS'ing for a couple more hours, after which it becomes beer:30eav1277 wrote:So drinking, bonfire, target practice, sleeping? What does everyone have planned?
- eav1277
- Posts: 378
- Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2012 9:58 am
Re: Feb Waiters
Beer not hard liquor? The hard liquor will help you forget quicker.ws81086n wrote:TLS'ing for a couple more hours, after which it becomes beer:30eav1277 wrote:So drinking, bonfire, target practice, sleeping? What does everyone have planned?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 313
- Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2012 9:47 pm
Re: Feb Waiters
Haha, I'm in no need of forgetting. Def wish I felt a bit better, but all-in-all I'm satisfied. As for liquor, I don't really wanna have a crazy night or anything, just kick back a bunch of beers.eav1277 wrote:Beer not hard liquor? The hard liquor will help you forget quicker.ws81086n wrote:TLS'ing for a couple more hours, after which it becomes beer:30eav1277 wrote:So drinking, bonfire, target practice, sleeping? What does everyone have planned?
-
- Posts: 56
- Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2012 8:10 am
Re: Feb Waiters
LR-RC-LR-LR-LG
LR-breeze
RC-fine but I know at the v end I changed a right answer to a wrong answer. Stupid, stupid, stupid. Thinking back now it seems incredible I didn't trust my original logic
LR-okay
LR-not great
LG-seemed fine but I was so out of it. I'd assumed that section four couldn't be an experimental so it counted and I was really disheartened... now I come on here and find out it was?? And maybe I had a shot at a really high score?? I have a bad feeling I was too unfocused and made stupid errors in what should be my best section, my guaranteed -0
My third LR... it had weird shit about Bronze Age animals, and dingos in some other question... this is experimental?
LR-breeze
RC-fine but I know at the v end I changed a right answer to a wrong answer. Stupid, stupid, stupid. Thinking back now it seems incredible I didn't trust my original logic
LR-okay
LR-not great
LG-seemed fine but I was so out of it. I'd assumed that section four couldn't be an experimental so it counted and I was really disheartened... now I come on here and find out it was?? And maybe I had a shot at a really high score?? I have a bad feeling I was too unfocused and made stupid errors in what should be my best section, my guaranteed -0
My third LR... it had weird shit about Bronze Age animals, and dingos in some other question... this is experimental?
-
- Posts: 16
- Joined: Sat Feb 09, 2013 5:04 pm
Re: Feb Waiters
KFV, do you remember which sections had 25 or 26 questions?
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login