PT 49:sec 2 Q15 (lr)

Prepare for the LSAT or discuss it with others in this forum.
User avatar

Posts: 65
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2011 10:15 pm

PT 49:sec 2 Q15 (lr)

Postby cany » Tue Aug 30, 2011 1:21 pm

Pls help me understand how C is the TCR when the stimulus is talking about the a product being used more 'regularly" to be tested over less frequently used product.

I think D is analogous because it prefers testing the frequently used medication over the other one.

Also,I eliminated E because of the word non-medical.Are we not assuming that non-medical is pertaining to cleaning stuff..

Pls help


Posts: 417
Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 8:05 pm

Re: PT 49:sec 2 Q15 (lr)

Postby LockBox » Wed Aug 31, 2011 6:34 pm

The question stem is asking which principle, if valid, justifies the conclusion.

The stimulus is dealing with a the relative importance of testing of a product which is being used by a greater number of people. (D) can be eliminated because it only deals with dosage, not the number of people who take the medication indicated. (E) simply deals with risk factors associated said products, not the proportion of people who use these products.

(C) if applied neatly justifies the conclusion.


Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum�

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests