Question about LSAT Score releases Forum

wdunn60958 · Post by **wdunn60958** » Mon Jun 13, 2011 3:39 pm

Hey guys, long time lurker here just have a quick question for anyone that would have an idea. I was wondering if LSAC holds the scores of the LSAT or they just release the scores as they come, thanks alot and I wish everybody the best of luck when the scores do come out

incompetentia · Post by **incompetentia** » Mon Jun 13, 2011 3:45 pm

The scores go out in batches, but they all go out within a 12-hour period.

You're not going to get your score this week or probably the beginning of next either.

wdunn60958 · Post by **wdunn60958** » Mon Jun 13, 2011 3:46 pm

Oh I know that, I was just wondering if they hold everybodys score for a couple of weeks and then release them.

Jeffort · Post by **Jeffort** » Mon Jun 13, 2011 7:35 pm

wdunn60958 wrote:Oh I know that, I was just wondering if they hold everybodys score for a couple of weeks and then release them.

They're not 'holding' them before score release. It take a few weeks for them to do all the processing to be able to release the scores. It's not as simple as just running a stack of bubble sheets through a machine and poof it's all done.

wdunn60958 · Post by **wdunn60958** » Mon Jun 13, 2011 10:49 pm

Jeffort wrote:
wdunn60958 wrote:Oh I know that, I was just wondering if they hold everybodys score for a couple of weeks and then release them.
They're not 'holding' them before score release. It take a few weeks for them to do all the processing to be able to release the scores. It's not as simple as just running a stack of bubble sheets through a machine and poof it's all done.

lol a simple yes or no would have done just fine, instead you felt the need to describe the process as if you're talking to a 3rd grader. nowhere in your rambling did you discuss the topic of business ethics, and we are all now dumber for having listened to you. you are awarded no points, and may god have mercy on your soul.

incompetentia · Post by **incompetentia** » Mon Jun 13, 2011 10:51 pm

Considering that you worded the question in such a way that the first response should have answered your question, there's really no need to get snippy

fatduck · Post by **fatduck** » Mon Jun 13, 2011 10:51 pm

wdunn60958 wrote:
Jeffort wrote:
wdunn60958 wrote:Oh I know that, I was just wondering if they hold everybodys score for a couple of weeks and then release them.
They're not 'holding' them before score release. It take a few weeks for them to do all the processing to be able to release the scores. It's not as simple as just running a stack of bubble sheets through a machine and poof it's all done.
lol a simple yes or no would have done just fine, instead you felt the need to describe the process as if you're talking to a 3rd grader. nowhere in your rambling did you discuss the topic of business ethics, and we are all now dumber for having listened to you. you are awarded no points, and may god have mercy on your soul.

i'm guessing you top out somewhere around 162

wdunn60958 · Post by **wdunn60958** » Mon Jun 13, 2011 10:55 pm

fatduck wrote:
wdunn60958 wrote:
Jeffort wrote:
wdunn60958 wrote:Oh I know that, I was just wondering if they hold everybodys score for a couple of weeks and then release them.
They're not 'holding' them before score release. It take a few weeks for them to do all the processing to be able to release the scores. It's not as simple as just running a stack of bubble sheets through a machine and poof it's all done.
lol a simple yes or no would have done just fine, instead you felt the need to describe the process as if you're talking to a 3rd grader. nowhere in your rambling did you discuss the topic of business ethics, and we are all now dumber for having listened to you. you are awarded no points, and may god have mercy on your soul.
i'm guessing you top out somewhere around 162

this is because i quote an all time great movie that you're 'above' watching.

incompetentia · Post by **incompetentia** » Mon Jun 13, 2011 10:59 pm

I don't think an Adam Sandler movie can be described as an all-time great.

fatduck · Post by **fatduck** » Mon Jun 13, 2011 11:01 pm

wdunn60958 wrote:this is because i quote an all time great movie that you're 'above' watching.

you're right, i clearly didn't get your reference. i'm so bad at those.

wdunn60958 · Post by **wdunn60958** » Mon Jun 13, 2011 11:12 pm

incompetentia wrote:I don't think an Adam Sandler movie can be described as an all-time great.

lol you obviously haven't seen the wedding singer.

fatduck · Post by **fatduck** » Mon Jun 13, 2011 11:15 pm

wdunn60958 wrote:
incompetentia wrote:I don't think an Adam Sandler movie can be described as an all-time great.
lol you obviously haven't seen the wedding singer.

I'M RICK JAMES, BITCH

incompetentia · Post by **incompetentia** » Mon Jun 13, 2011 11:16 pm

wdunn60958 wrote:
incompetentia wrote:I don't think an Adam Sandler movie can be described as an all-time great.
lol you obviously haven't seen the wedding singer.

All-time great movies:
The Wedding Singer
Billy Madison

Is Click on this list too?

wdunn60958 · Post by **wdunn60958** » Mon Jun 13, 2011 11:18 pm

No, Click would not make it, but you can go ahead and put Big Daddy and The Waterboy on there.. Sounds like you would agree with me on this though.

wdunn60958 · Post by **wdunn60958** » Mon Jun 13, 2011 11:20 pm

But then again I don't think you'd have the time to do absolutely anything else because you haven't even been a member of this site for a year and have over 7000 posts.. I don't know if that is sad or commendable?

fatduck · Post by **fatduck** » Mon Jun 13, 2011 11:22 pm

wdunn60958 wrote:But then again I don't think you'd have the time to do absolutely anything else because you haven't even been a member of this site for a year and have over 7000 posts.. I don't know if that is sad or commendable?

9 posts ladies and gentleman, scoring is official, paying all wagers for 9 posts.

wdunn60958 · Post by **wdunn60958** » Mon Jun 13, 2011 11:24 pm

fatduck wrote:
wdunn60958 wrote:But then again I don't think you'd have the time to do absolutely anything else because you haven't even been a member of this site for a year and have over 7000 posts.. I don't know if that is sad or commendable?
9 posts ladies and gentleman, scoring is official, paying all wagers for 9 posts.

virgin

incompetentia · Post by **incompetentia** » Mon Jun 13, 2011 11:25 pm

fatduck wrote:
wdunn60958 wrote:But then again I don't think you'd have the time to do absolutely anything else because you haven't even been a member of this site for a year and have over 7000 posts.. I don't know if that is sad or commendable?
9 posts ladies and gentleman, scoring is official, paying all wagers for 9 posts.

No, remember, we September registers, we're obviously douches.

delusional · Post by **delusional** » Mon Jun 13, 2011 11:25 pm

wdunn60958 wrote:But then again I don't think you'd have the time to do absolutely anything else because you haven't even been a member of this site for a year and have over 7000 posts.. I don't know if that is sad or commendable?

God almighty, what possesses people to come here, ask for advice, and then mock the people here? Maybe he's a loser. Or maybe he's a nice guy who doesn't mind helping the people who can't use google to find put how scores are released, or read the LSAC website to find out how they pretend they're released.

fatduck · Post by **fatduck** » Mon Jun 13, 2011 11:26 pm

incompetentia wrote:
fatduck wrote:
wdunn60958 wrote:But then again I don't think you'd have the time to do absolutely anything else because you haven't even been a member of this site for a year and have over 7000 posts.. I don't know if that is sad or commendable?
9 posts ladies and gentleman, scoring is official, paying all wagers for 9 posts.
No, remember, we September registers, we're obviously douches.

holy shit, you joined tls after me?

this guy might be onto something.

incompetentia · Post by **incompetentia** » Mon Jun 13, 2011 11:26 pm

delusional wrote:
wdunn60958 wrote:But then again I don't think you'd have the time to do absolutely anything else because you haven't even been a member of this site for a year and have over 7000 posts.. I don't know if that is sad or commendable?
God almighty, what possesses people to come here, ask for advice, and then mock the people here? Maybe he's a loser. Or maybe he's a nice guy who doesn't mind helping the people who can't use google to find put how scores are released, or read the LSAC website to find out how they pretend they're released.

Clearly the former. I mean, obviously.

wdunn60958 · Post by **wdunn60958** » Mon Jun 13, 2011 11:29 pm

incompetentia wrote:
delusional wrote:
wdunn60958 wrote:But then again I don't think you'd have the time to do absolutely anything else because you haven't even been a member of this site for a year and have over 7000 posts.. I don't know if that is sad or commendable?
God almighty, what possesses people to come here, ask for advice, and then mock the people here? Maybe he's a loser. Or maybe he's a nice guy who doesn't mind helping the people who can't use google to find put how scores are released, or read the LSAC website to find out how they pretend they're released.
Clearly the former. I mean, obviously.

just wish i had that kind of time on my hands, im actually a little jealous

delusional · Post by **delusional** » Mon Jun 13, 2011 11:31 pm

wdunn60958 wrote:
incompetentia wrote:
delusional wrote:
wdunn60958 wrote:But then again I don't think you'd have the time to do absolutely anything else because you haven't even been a member of this site for a year and have over 7000 posts.. I don't know if that is sad or commendable?
God almighty, what possesses people to come here, ask for advice, and then mock the people here? Maybe he's a loser. Or maybe he's a nice guy who doesn't mind helping the people who can't use google to find put how scores are released, or read the LSAC website to find out how they pretend they're released.
Clearly the former. I mean, obviously.
just wish i had that kind of time on my hands, im actually a little jealous

You want jealous? He got a 180. Make sure to let us know how it turns out for you.

incompetentia · Post by **incompetentia** » Mon Jun 13, 2011 11:32 pm

I really don't need people hawking my score about, but I appreciate the sentiment.

delusional · Post by **delusional** » Mon Jun 13, 2011 11:33 pm

incompetentia wrote:I really don't need people hawking my score about, but I appreciate the sentiment.

Aww comeon, you know you love it.

Question about LSAT Score releases Forum

Question about LSAT Score releases

Re: LSAT Score

Re: LSAT Score

Re: LSAT Score

Re: LSAT Score

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Re: Question about LSAT Score releases

Re: LSAT Score

Re: LSAT Score

Re: Question about LSAT Score releases

Register for access!

Re: LSAT Score

Re: Question about LSAT Score releases

Re: Question about LSAT Score releases

Re: Question about LSAT Score releases

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

Re: Question about LSAT Score releases

Re: Question about LSAT Score releases

Re: Question about LSAT Score releases

Re: Question about LSAT Score releases

Register now!

Re: Question about LSAT Score releases

Re: Question about LSAT Score releases

Re: Question about LSAT Score releases

Re: Question about LSAT Score releases

Register now, it's still FREE!

Re: Question about LSAT Score releases

Re: Question about LSAT Score releases

Re: Question about LSAT Score releases

Re: Question about LSAT Score releases

Seriously? What are you waiting for?