Which game on the Dec. LSAT was toughest? Forum

[kkklick]

this logic games section was easy.. you are all just stupid people. sorry. enjoy your stay at cooley

p.s. the range is from 0 stars to 5 stars not 1 star to 5 stars you dumbass.

I don't care what score I get, as long as I beat you (and people like you).

[crit_racer]

It was a hard games section...don't let these assholes fuck with you. I usually miss between 0 and 3 on games sections, but definitely missed more on this one. Granted, descriptors like "hard" are always subjective, but I think it's safe to say that when the vast majority of ppl think that this section was hard, that it was, in fact, hard.

[lakers3peat]

Go find us a review of a 0-star hotel or restaurant, and then get back to us. Until then, you are the weakest link.

Go read the rolling stones. there are plenty of cds that get half a star for a rating. Maybe if your nerdy ass got your head out of the books for a second you might be exposed to a little pop culture

[lakers3peat]

I personally found it difficult, it may just be because of the anxiety. I was scoring high in PTs. However, I hope that you fail miserably at life and get cancer. Douche.

sorry, i dont think it was anxiety.. i think you are just stupid.

[hndls022]

edit.

[Attorney]

Go find us a review of a 0-star hotel or restaurant, and then get back to us. Until then, you are the weakest link.

Go read the rolling stones. there are plenty of cds that get half a star for a rating. Maybe if your nerdy ass got your head out of the books for a second you might be exposed to a little pop culture

The rolling stones, eh? Idiot.

And as you pointed out, even Rolling Stone (notice the capitalization and singular tense, moron) with its joking ways, has never assigned 0 stars.

PS - you're really dumb.
PPS - But seriously. Like I can't believe how stupid you are.

[Attorney]

Go find us a review of a 0-star hotel or restaurant, and then get back to us. Until then, you are the weakest link.

Go read the rolling stones. there are plenty of cds that get half a star for a rating. Maybe if your nerdy ass got your head out of the books for a second you might be exposed to a little pop culture

The rolling stones, eh? Idiot.

And as you pointed out, even Rolling Stone (notice the capitalization and singular tense, moron) with its joking ways, has never assigned 0 stars.

PS - you're really dumb.
PPS - But seriously. Like I can't believe how stupid you are.

LOL, he won't respond here but takes potshots in other threads.

[TyrodTaylor]

not to burst yalls bubble. But my first game, was the infamous one. So i dont think this poll will work, since the order of the games appears to be different. And i am positive it was my first game, because when i oculd see through the page before the section i thought i had RC next and i turned it over and saw it was a game with no space.

[PNorman1968]

The whole games section was pretty difficult compared to the PTs I took.

[Manhattan LSAT Noah]

Cool - thanks for the votes and the uplifting discussion. Looks like we'll focus on the middle games, with an emphasis on saving time (though, frankly, a lot of that is about speeding up on the simpler games).

We're doing the workshop on Tues. even (the 11th), so just like everyone else, we're really hoping that the scores are released soon or else we're going to be up all night preparing. PM if you would like the sign-up link.

[TyrodTaylor]

okay, well you are an idiot because my sgw game was first. i know that for a fact.

[Manhattan LSAT Noah]

okay, well you are an idiot because my sgw game was first. i know that for a fact.

You aren't the first to suggest that ...We'll definitely check on the topics and see if they correspond to what they're saying. Thanks for the heads up.

[lsat_doobie]

Do a majority of people seriously consider the third game harder then the second? I thought after making a pretty obvious inference on the third game, it was really easy. The game was extremely restricted. I'm worried now that I might have missed something

[TyrodTaylor]

well when you are that nice about it... you are no longer an idiot

[robotclubmember]

Cool - thanks for the votes and the uplifting discussion. Looks like we'll focus on the middle games, with an emphasis on saving time (though, frankly, a lot of that is about speeding up on the simpler games).

We're doing the workshop on Tues. even (the 11th), so just like everyone else, we're really hoping that the scores are released soon or else we're going to be up all night preparing. PM if you would like the sign-up link.

I agree about speeding up the simpler games. Most normal people aren't going to solve games 2 and 3 in 8:45. But game 4 can be done in under five minutes. You shouldn't prepare people just to be able to knock out games like 2 and 3 in 8:45, because games like that are hard to predict. All you can do is give a flexible test-taker the tools so they can calibrate when they see something they weren't prepared for, but those games would still take time. It's just as important being able to solve the easy games like 4 in under 5 minutes, because realistically, if you couldn't do 4 in 5 minutes, you probably won't be able to finish that LG section as a whole.

[2Serious4Numbers]

Do a majority of people seriously consider the third game harder then the second? I thought after making a pretty obvious inference on the third game, it was really easy. The game was extremely restricted. I'm worried now that I might have missed something

you did. it was a crucial rule too. now sit back and enjoy!

[androstan]

Game 2: Time consuming, not necessarily hard, per se

Game 3: Time consuming AND hard

If the possibilities are one star, two star, three star, four star, or five star, then 3 star is the "middlest" score i.e. there are equal numbers of scores that are greater than and less than it.

[kkklick]

Do a majority of people seriously consider the third game harder then the second? I thought after making a pretty obvious inference on the third game, it was really easy. The game was extremely restricted. I'm worried now that I might have missed something

It is my understanding that there were no major inferences for the 3rd game. So either you are part of a very small minority of those who caught it or you made an inference that didn't follow from the rules. I was able to complete 4/5 on conference with confidence and didn't have any inference (especially a major one).

[chopper]

Go find us a review of a 0-star hotel or restaurant, and then get back to us. Until then, you are the weakest link.

Go read the rolling stones. there are plenty of cds that get half a star for a rating. Maybe if your nerdy ass got your head out of the books for a second you might be exposed to a little pop culture

When Motor Trend rates cars, it's on a 1-5 star rating.

As for the games, I felt SG and Conferences was hard and time consuming, and utilities was pretty time consuming (with no room)...can't remember the fourth, but I do remember it was pretty easy.