RC-LR-LR-LG_LR Forum
- 2011L1
- Posts: 90
- Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2010 3:33 pm
RC-LR-LR-LG_LR
did anyone else have this? I'm betting the 2nd LR was exp no way it could be the 3rd one
- 2011L1
- Posts: 90
- Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2010 3:33 pm
Re: RC-LR-LR-LG_LR
???2011L1 wrote:did anyone else have this? I'm betting the 2nd LR was exp no way it could be the 3rd one
-
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2010 5:53 pm
Re: RC-LR-LR-LG_LR
yeah.. thats what i thought too thinkin 2nd was experimental but the testmaster operator tellin me the 2nd section was experimental for all types. but iono if she is speakin the truth because i feel like there were more than two distributions and some are swearing they had 4th as experimental.
so... anyone else got any inputs on this? oh yeah also do you remember what questions were asked in 2nd section? i cant remember a THING. knowing what question was (vaguely of c.) in #2 section would help us figure out if it was exp or not.
so... anyone else got any inputs on this? oh yeah also do you remember what questions were asked in 2nd section? i cant remember a THING. knowing what question was (vaguely of c.) in #2 section would help us figure out if it was exp or not.
- 2011L1
- Posts: 90
- Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2010 3:33 pm
Re: RC-LR-LR-LG_LR
I'm swearing that the 2nd Lr was expiramental meaning the 3rd section overallminster wrote:yeah.. thats what i thought too thinking 2nd was experimental but the testmaster operator tellin me the 2nd section was experimental for all types. but iono if she is speakin the truth because i feel like there were more than two distributions and some are swearing they had 4th as experimental.
so... anyone else got any inputs on this? oh yeah also do you remember what questions were asked in 2nd section? i cant remember a THING. knowing what question was (vaguely of c.) in #2 section would help us figure out if it was exp or not.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login