lol don't worry I am not 100% sure about all the ones I didn't guess on, there were a bunch where it was about a 60/40 call, but only one where it was a complete 1/5 guess.Moral_Midgetry wrote:You make me hate myself.2011Law wrote:lol, on the exp LG I had to guess 6 q's, on the real one I guessed 1. Conferences was hard though.phannahan44 wrote:Anyone else with 2 LG sections notice how the experimental section was wayyy easier!? It was a joke. I had that section 3rd and then flipped the page after the break to see another LG and I thought shit!
The real LG section was impossible. I was just guessing. The windows game, and conferences game, killed me.
Here's to guessing well?!?
December 2010 Initial Reactions Forum
-
- Posts: 822
- Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2010 3:40 pm
Re: December 2010 Initial Reactions
- veragood
- Posts: 76
- Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2010 2:22 pm
Re: December 2010 Initial Reactions
I'm seriously so mad at the real LG right now. Where the fuck did that come from? Siggghhhh.
Is this really the first 102 question LSAT ever?
Is this really the first 102 question LSAT ever?
-
- Posts: 822
- Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2010 3:40 pm
Re: December 2010 Initial Reactions
I would bet on -12/13, based on the trends and the difficulty of games.Moral_Midgetry wrote:I really hope it is more than -12. If it is -10 I'm screwed.beidoun wrote:With a 102 possible correct questions I would say at least -12. LG was very difficult and that usually sets the curve.2Serious4Numbers wrote:i'm sticking with my pre-test prediction of a -10 curve
-
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2010 3:11 pm
Re: December 2010 Initial Reactions
Was the LR with 25 questions definitely experimental?? damn it.
One LR started with a question about training dogs. Did anyone who didn't have an experimental LR section have that question?
One LR started with a question about training dogs. Did anyone who didn't have an experimental LR section have that question?
-
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2010 6:19 pm
Re: December 2010 Initial Reactions
ladder question is real. confirmedjd20132013 wrote:Shit it's starting to blur together now. I'm pretty sure the ladder question was in what I thought was the experimental LR...
fuck
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Moral_Midgetry
- Posts: 543
- Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 3:29 pm
Re: December 2010 Initial Reactions
Me too. I'm so pissed about the LG section.veragood wrote:I'm seriously so mad at the real LG right now. Where the fuck did that come from? Siggghhhh.
Is this really the first 102 question LSAT ever?
- veragood
- Posts: 76
- Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2010 2:22 pm
Re: December 2010 Initial Reactions
can you explain what you mean by curve? like, -12 = 170 or something?
-
- Posts: 1381
- Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 4:41 pm
Re: December 2010 Initial Reactions
In any case, thank you to the nice girl who reminded me that most schools take the highest score.
And while a 161 was disappointing i can still get into some good schools with it.
I'm cautiously predicting at least a 164 but if I'm totally wrong and I flubbed it completely, it's not the end of the world with a good GPA.
So for those of you retaking an ok score, at least you have that.
And while a 161 was disappointing i can still get into some good schools with it.
I'm cautiously predicting at least a 164 but if I'm totally wrong and I flubbed it completely, it's not the end of the world with a good GPA.
So for those of you retaking an ok score, at least you have that.
-
- Posts: 822
- Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2010 3:40 pm
Re: December 2010 Initial Reactions
yesveragood wrote:can you explain what you mean by curve? like, -12 = 170 or something?
-
- Posts: 1381
- Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 4:41 pm
Re: December 2010 Initial Reactions
ohcede wrote:Was the LR with 25 questions definitely experimental?? damn it.
One LR started with a question about training dogs. Did anyone who didn't have an experimental LR section have that question?
lmao this is my cue to leave this mesage board because i don't remember this at all and I had three LRs.
Of course I'll probably be here the rest of the day
-
- Posts: 242
- Joined: Fri Jul 16, 2010 12:09 am
Re: December 2010 Initial Reactions
Section 2 RC, vs Section 3 RC, really tripped me up. I didn't even finish Section 2 RC. Overall, I thought this was extremely difficult compared to 95% of the tests of the past preptests. I will unfortunately have to take it again because I canceled.
-
- Posts: 822
- Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2010 3:40 pm
Re: December 2010 Initial Reactions
+1westy wrote:ladder question is real. confirmedjd20132013 wrote:Shit it's starting to blur together now. I'm pretty sure the ladder question was in what I thought was the experimental LR...
fuck
-
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Tue Jul 27, 2010 11:42 am
Re: December 2010 Initial Reactions
I did NOT have an experimental LR and did NOT see that question. Thus, it was experimental.ohcede wrote:Was the LR with 25 questions definitely experimental?? damn it.
One LR started with a question about training dogs. Did anyone who didn't have an experimental LR section have that question?
Don't kill the messenger?
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 822
- Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2010 3:40 pm
Re: December 2010 Initial Reactions
I do not recall training dogs.jd20132013 wrote:ohcede wrote:Was the LR with 25 questions definitely experimental?? damn it.
One LR started with a question about training dogs. Did anyone who didn't have an experimental LR section have that question?
lmao this is my cue to leave this mesage board because i don't remember this at all and I had three LRs.
Of course I'll probably be here the rest of the day
-
- Posts: 242
- Joined: Fri Jul 16, 2010 12:09 am
Re: December 2010 Initial Reactions
I also thought the real LG was really fucking tough.
-
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2010 3:11 pm
Re: December 2010 Initial Reactions
Experimental LR was definitely the 25 question one then. Fuckkkkk
-
- Posts: 72
- Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2010 10:19 pm
Re: December 2010 Initial Reactions
How about all the questions on aliens / paranormal activity on this one? One of which was the toughest LR I've ever come across.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- 2things2
- Posts: 183
- Joined: Mon Sep 20, 2010 2:39 am
Re: December 2010 Initial Reactions
did stellar on both LRs and LG, absolutely bombed the RC, apart from the medical experts passage. Literally I don't know what happened but I had no idea what was going on in the RC. A horrible feeling of helplessness. Brutal way to start the exam, but I guess I just have to stick with it. What can ya do?
-
- Posts: 1381
- Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 4:41 pm
Re: December 2010 Initial Reactions
I remember only one alien LR, but I agree that it was tough.
Last edited by jd20132013 on Sat Dec 11, 2010 3:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Moral_Midgetry
- Posts: 543
- Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 3:29 pm
Re: December 2010 Initial Reactions
I thought the first LR section was above average difficulty but the last one was much easier. I finished it with ten minutes to spare.
-
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2010 9:37 am
Re: December 2010 Initial Reactions
Hey does anyone remember a question on LR dealing with stone windmills vs. wooden windmills in Medevil Europe and England?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- DukeCornell
- Posts: 279
- Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 3:19 am
Re: December 2010 Initial Reactions
Any thoughts on which part was experimental?
- URMdan
- Posts: 402
- Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2010 8:03 pm
Re: December 2010 Initial Reactions
There's at least 2 LR exp sectionsohcede wrote:Experimental LR was definitely the 25 question one then. Fuckkkkk
-
- Posts: 52
- Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2010 10:28 pm
Re: December 2010 Initial Reactions
Yesreptar320 wrote:Hey does anyone remember a question on LR dealing with stone windmills vs. wooden windmills in Medevil Europe and England?
-
- Posts: 151
- Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 7:55 pm
Re: December 2010 Initial Reactions
Anyone else agree that opening up the test to Lichens was painful?
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login