[LR]PT 23 Section 3 #25

Prepare for the LSAT or discuss it with others in this forum.
User avatar

Posts: 7
Joined: Tue Oct 13, 2009 9:44 am

[LR]PT 23 Section 3 #25

Postby laukinming » Thu Aug 26, 2010 5:30 am

It is a convoluted argument. I don't know how to get the answer: why "justify an action" is equal to "justify a means"?


Posts: 38
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2010 10:04 pm

Re: [LR]PT 23 Section 3 #25

Postby JacobH » Thu Aug 26, 2010 12:30 pm

I think you're making the argument more complicated than it should be. The first sentence indicates that the end value is based on intent, so if you pair that with the conclusion that nothing but an end's value can justify your "means", or reason for action, then answer C becomes the clear paraphrase to that argument.

Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum�

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests