RC on this test was some what interesting? Forum
-
- Posts: 2145
- Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2008 2:41 am
RC on this test was some what interesting?
Did any one find that the RC passages on this test were pretty interesting to read? The topics were not that bad.
Can someone also pm about the Mulch game to talk details? The game was kinda tricky for me I do not know why.
Can someone also pm about the Mulch game to talk details? The game was kinda tricky for me I do not know why.
- 3|ink
- Posts: 7393
- Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 5:23 pm
Re: RC on this test was some what interesting?
They were not even remotely interesting to me.
-
- Posts: 2145
- Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2008 2:41 am
Re: RC on this test was some what interesting?
3|ink wrote:They were not even remotely interesting to me.
I liked the Urban/suburban passage
- jpSartre
- Posts: 326
- Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2010 11:05 am
Re: RC on this test was some what interesting?
+13|ink wrote:They were not even remotely interesting to me.
-
- Posts: 482
- Joined: Sat Oct 17, 2009 11:26 am
Re: RC on this test was some what interesting?
Actually, I thought they were pretty interesting. I enjoyed the suburburn one and I really liked the one about the contigency fees.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Kchuck
- Posts: 187
- Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 1:49 am
Re: RC on this test was some what interesting?
Personally, I enjoy reading about Chicano acting troupes.
- Philipsssssss
- Posts: 157
- Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2008 2:57 pm
Re: RC on this test was some what interesting?
4th RC was hard.
-
- Posts: 124
- Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2010 10:38 pm
Re: RC on this test was some what interesting?
dancing honey bees was the least painful for me
- suspicious android
- Posts: 919
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 4:54 pm
Re: RC on this test was some what interesting?
this is a weird thought, I think. The contingency fee passage is some amazingly boring shit, even by LSAC standards. Not super hard or anything, but boring. Same thing with the chicano acting troop. The dancing bees and new urbanism ones were mildly interesting, I'll admit. Not as interesting as the Ultimate Game, which is one of the few genuinely interesting RC passages ever, I think.
-
- Posts: 269
- Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2010 10:04 pm
Re: RC on this test was some what interesting?
The bees were the best. I knew about bee dancing, of course, but I had no idea that bees would not listen to one of their own about food sources in the middle of a lake (on a boat). I've always maintained those little bastards are smarter than we think and are up to no good.
I'd read about New Urbanism before, which was a pretty substantial confidence boost. I did this part in 5 minutes or so (though I still almost ran out of time on the contingency passage).
I'd read about New Urbanism before, which was a pretty substantial confidence boost. I did this part in 5 minutes or so (though I still almost ran out of time on the contingency passage).
- oxford_don
- Posts: 235
- Joined: Mon Nov 10, 2008 11:06 am
Re: RC on this test was some what interesting?
[]
Last edited by oxford_don on Sun May 11, 2014 11:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 718
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 8:50 pm
Re: RC on this test was some what interesting?
I almost actually enjoyed this RC. I thought it was interesting and I finished in plenty of time. No killer passages or questions really threw me for a loop.
- kkklick
- Posts: 1012
- Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2010 8:33 pm
Re: RC on this test was some what interesting?
I actually liked the contingency fee passage, I read it so quick and was able to comprehend everything. The bee passage put me to sleep. I don't care if bees dance. I dont care how they communicate. Stop talking about it.
/rant
/rant
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- nematoad
- Posts: 419
- Joined: Thu Dec 10, 2009 3:06 pm
Re: RC on this test was some what interesting?
Funny as it is, i thought every passage BUT the bees was easy. I must have zoned out. A couple of the questions had me stuck and I essentially guessed. Balls balls balls. Bees bees bees. Shit.
-
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Fri May 21, 2010 5:08 am
Re: RC on this test was some what interesting?
I really hope and believe this is sarcasm. Otherwise, you are a sad sad person.Kchuck wrote:Personally, I enjoy reading about Chicano acting troupes.
-
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 9:31 pm
Re: RC on this test was some what interesting?
do you guys have any vague impression left of the answer choices for contingency fee? I was running out of time and had to guess almost all the answers to that one, which sucks since the topic was much much more accessible to me than chicano theater.
-
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2009 9:22 pm
Re: RC on this test was some what interesting?
Way more interesting than last June's RC (which isn't saying much). Fractalzzzzz and Willa Cather were the bratwurst.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 1397
- Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2008 11:10 pm
Re: RC on this test was some what interesting?
thought this was an easy rc.
-
- Posts: 80
- Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2009 9:22 pm
Re: RC on this test was some what interesting?
yea they are so interesting that I was so deeply sunk in the joy of feeling the breeze of the first 3 articles that I totally ran out of time for the 4th one, which potentially could be the most exciting and intriguing masterpiece.
-
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2009 9:22 pm
Re: RC on this test was some what interesting?
Pretty much the same for me. I spent way too much time puzzling over a couple of questions in the honeybee and one of the other passages, and had 5 minutes left right as I started the Aussie Law passage. I completely went with whatever answer jumped out at me with the questions and amazingly was able to answer them all before time expired; however if there was even the slightest trickiness with the wordings on a given question or answer choice than I probably missed a few there.idoubtit wrote:yea they are so interesting that I was so deeply sunk in the joy of feeling the breeze of the first 3 articles that I totally ran out of time for the 4th one, which potentially could be the most exciting and intriguing masterpiece.
-
- Posts: 80
- Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2009 9:22 pm
Re: RC on this test was some what interesting?
June09Sucked wrote:Pretty much the same for me. I spent way too much time puzzling over a couple of questions in the honeybee and one of the other passages, and had 5 minutes left right as I started the Aussie Law passage. I completely went with whatever answer jumped out at me with the questions and amazingly was able to answer them all before time expired; however if there was even the slightest trickiness with the wordings on a given question or answer choice than I probably missed a few there.idoubtit wrote:yea they are so interesting that I was so deeply sunk in the joy of feeling the breeze of the first 3 articles that I totally ran out of time for the 4th one, which potentially could be the most exciting and intriguing masterpiece.
Yea I had to do the same thing as you. If there are any subtle tricks we are done.
By the way judging by your name, u took the June 09 one as well? how much better do u think u will be this time?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 535
- Joined: Fri May 07, 2010 10:29 pm
Re: RC on this test was some what interesting?
Topics were a snooze to me compared to other RC's.
-
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2009 9:22 pm
Re: RC on this test was some what interesting?
Re: vs. June '09, I think my score will be at worst 1 or 2 points worse this time, possibly as good as 4-5 points better. 6 or 7 would be a miracle. Depends on curve and whether I got any of my guesses right.idoubtit wrote: Yea I had to do the same thing as you. If there are any subtle tricks we are done.
By the way judging by your name, u took the June 09 one as well? how much better do u think u will be this time?
I am guessing I scored 2 or 3 points better than '09. Pretty meh but would definitely help in applying to places. I guess.
-
- Posts: 326
- Joined: Mon Feb 15, 2010 1:52 pm
Re: RC on this test was some what interesting?
I killed riddled basins and Willa Cather is my -0 bitch, but June '10's RC was probably the section I'm most worried about.June09Sucked wrote:Way more interesting than last June's RC (which isn't saying much). Fractalzzzzz and Willa Cather were the bratwurst.
- OklahomasOK
- Posts: 394
- Joined: Fri Mar 26, 2010 1:10 pm
Re: RC on this test was some what interesting?
I liked all the articles, but I found the questions on New Urbanism difficult.
I really liked the Western Australia contingency fees passage... oddly enough.
I really liked the Western Australia contingency fees passage... oddly enough.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login