June LSAT score release dates

[LSAT Blog]

Official release date is June 28, but scores usually come back a few days earlier.

When do you all think they'll release the June LSAT scores this year?

Here's what's gone down since 2004:

June Test Dates
Monday, June 14, 2004
Monday, June 6, 2005
Monday, June 12, 2006
Monday, June 11, 2007
Monday, June 16, 2008
Monday, June 8, 2009
Monday, June 7, 2010

Actual Score Release Dates
Friday, July 2, 2004
Saturday, June 25, 2005
Thursday, June 29, 2006
Saturday, June 30, 2007
Thursday, July 3, 2008
Thursday, June 25, 2009
???, 2010

Scheduled Score Release Dates
Tuesday, July 6, 2004
Monday, June 27, 2005
Monday, July 3, 2006
Monday, July 2, 2007
Monday, July 7, 2008
Monday, June 29, 2009
Monday, June 28, 2010

[mz253]

will they postpone releasing the score b/c asia hasn't taken the exam? also, is the score based on the SAME exam (content wise), or the same DATE (say June)?

[LSAT Blog]

It might seem strange that the June exam is so much later in Asia (as well as in Australia and New Zealand), but it's like that every year.

It'll be a different test than the one that people in North America took today. Even travel by ship would allow enough time for North American test-takers to report secret test info to friends in Asia/Australia/NZ.

Your score release date will not be impacted by the fact that some overseas test-takers won't take it until 6/27.

-Steve

[mz253]

so does it mean it's easier to take the LSAT in somewhere people's first language is not English? Say if i take it in Asia, and most people there taking it don't speak English, so the average will be worse and I'll be better off?

[Dany]

LSAT Blog: I thought it was a little easier to read laid out like this! Thanks for all the dates!

[LSAT Blog]

That's great - thank YOU!

[gweng]

so does it mean it's easier to take the LSAT in somewhere people's first language is not English? Say if i take it in Asia, and most people there taking it don't speak English, so the average will be worse and I'll be better off?

not necessarily. I've found out Asian kids who'd never been to any English speaking country getting 170+'s on the LSAT, making me feel a bit dead inside.

[idoubtit]

so does it mean it's easier to take the LSAT in somewhere people's first language is not English? Say if i take it in Asia, and most people there taking it don't speak English, so the average will be worse and I'll be better off?

not necessarily. I've found out Asian kids who'd never been to any English speaking country getting 170+'s on the LSAT, making me feel a bit dead inside.

I hear u. but one thing to remember: their spoken English is really bad and I don't think they can pass the real interviews of top law schools here.

[gweng]

so does it mean it's easier to take the LSAT in somewhere people's first language is not English? Say if i take it in Asia, and most people there taking it don't speak English, so the average will be worse and I'll be better off?

not necessarily. I've found out Asian kids who'd never been to any English speaking country getting 170+'s on the LSAT, making me feel a bit dead inside.

I hear u. but one thing to remember: their spoken English is really bad and I don't think they can pass the real interviews of top law schools here.

wait--which schools do real interviews besides NW?

[LSAT Blog]

so does it mean it's easier to take the LSAT in somewhere people's first language is not English? Say if i take it in Asia, and most people there taking it don't speak English, so the average will be worse and I'll be better off?

You wouldn't gain any special advantage by taking it in a country with fewer native English speakers.

Your comment is based on the assumption that the LSAT is curved. It's not curved. It's equated.

More on that here: viewtopic.php?f=6&t=119795