How to Brief a Case 101 - Don't waste money on Law Preview

(Study Tips, Dealing With Stress, Maintaining a Social Life, Financial Aid, Internships, Bar Exam, Careers in Law . . . )
User avatar
orangeswarm
Posts: 198
Joined: Tue Dec 12, 2006 8:38 pm

How to Brief a Case 101 - Don't waste money on Law Preview

Postby orangeswarm » Fri May 29, 2009 11:40 am

Okay, so a lot of people on here seem worried they aren't going to be prepared for 1L and have at least considered taking a law preview course. I am here to save you all $1000 and show you how to brief a case - pretty much what you will learn in a law preview class. Below, you will find a cut of a case and then a short brief below it. As long as you can follow what I've done, you now know how to brief a case and are 100% prepared for the first day of law school.

The only other things you will need to do between reading this thread and fall semester final exams are (1) look at a couple of old - or commercial - outlines to see how this stuff is condensed into outline format for exam prep purposes; and (2) possibly read GTM (or get some Siegel's books) to help you figure out how to answer a LS exam.

NOTE: The issues in this case aren't easy, so don't be concerned if you don't understand the topic. You just need to get the gist of what has been done and how I came up with the brief.

California Union Ins. Co. v. American Diversified Sav. Bank
948 F.2d 556
C.A.9 (Cal.),1991.

[American Diversified Savings Bank (“ADSB”), as required by federal law, took out insurance policies that insured against the wrongdoing of its officers and employees. The policies provided that coverage was limited to wrongdoing discovered while the policy was in force. The policy has a specific term but also provided that it would be terminated upon the "taking over" by a regulator, liquidator, or other entity. Several months after obtaining the policy, ADSB failed and was taken over by the the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation (“FSLIC”), thereby terminating the insurance policy by its terms. After taking over ADSB, the FSLIC discovered that certain employees of ADSB committed wrongdoing which contributed to the bank's failure. The FSLIC then brought a claim under the insurance policy.]

. . .

III.

It is undisputed that FSLIC is eligible to recover for the claimed covered losses provided that there was “discovery” under the bond prior to the date of termination. . . . FSLIC contends the district court erred when it determined that equitable tolling did not properly apply to extend the period for discovery of losses under the bond.

. . .

2. Equitable Tolling

[4] Alternatively, FSLIC contends that the discovery period under the National Union and Lloyd's bonds should be equitably tolled because Sahni and Day so completely dominated and controlled ADSB and its subsidiaries that the entities lacked the legal capacity to discover losses under the bond. FSLIC maintains that, as the bonds specify that only the Insureds can discover losses under the bonds, the entities must have the legal capacity “to discover” in order for that condition to be met. See Admiralty Fund, 143 Cal.App.3d at 386-89, 191 Cal.Rptr. at 758-59; accord Kehoe v. Peerless Ins. Co., No. 74-1905-MC (1980 WL 1425), Fed.Sec.L.Rep. (CCH) ¶ 97,583 (D.Mass.1980). Consequently, FSLIC seeks to rely on principles of equitable tolling in order to extend the period for discovery of losses under the Form 22 bonds.


In Admiralty Fund, the insured maintained that the discovery period, for losses claimed against a fidelity bond, should be equitably tolled “due to the adverse domination and control [of the insured] by the very defalcating ‘employees' who caused the losses.” 143 Cal.App.3d at 383, 191 Cal.Rptr. at 755. The court held that if “the dishonest president and other high ranking officers controlled the [company's] operations to such an extent as to preclude discovery, the tolling of a discovery of loss provision should be considered.” Id. at 389, 191 Cal.Rptr. at 759. The court noted that otherwise, the shareholders would receive no protection under the fidelity policy during the time the wrongdoers controlled the company. Id.


FSLIC argues that the evidence presented in this case supports the conclusion that ADSB was adversely dominated and controlled by the wrongdoers, Sahni and Day. Sahni and Day owned all the stock and held key positions. Further, FSLIC argues that the public policy considerations in this instance are even more compelling than those in Admiralty Fund. Thus, the discovery period on the Form 22 bonds should be equitably tolled.


We reiterate that in Admiralty Fund, the court began its analysis with the general rule; namely, that “[g]enerally, the courts have strictly enforced such [discovery of loss] provisions so that neither difficulty in discovering insured losses nor employee concealment excuse the insured's performance.” Id. at 384, 191 Cal.Rptr. at 756. Only under certain circumstances may this general rule may be set aside and the tolling of the discovery of loss provision considered. See id. at 389, 191 Cal.Rptr. at 759. While this may be appropriate in situations where there is such domination and control as to preclude non-wrongdoing employees from “discovery,” it is not warranted under the facts of this case.


Here, it is not controverted that there were non-wrongdoing employees who could have discovered the losses prior to takeover. Moreover, FHLB examiners were investigating ADSB for two years prior to the takeover. The regulators were closely overseeing the thrift and had the ability, either independently or through FSLIC, to uncover the facts and notify ADSB of the discovery. We simply do not have an Admiralty Fund situation in which all involved but the wrongdoers were powerless to act in order to prevent the loss of coverage under the fidelity bonds. FSLIC must be charged with knowledge of the requirement that “discovery” occur prior to the termination of the bond period. By failing either to reform the bond or take steps to charge the Insured with knowledge of facts that would constitute “discovery” under the bonds, FSLIC missed its opportunity to claim coverage under the National Union or Lloyd's Form 22 bond in this case. It cannot now look to the equitable tolling *566 doctrine to reallocate the bargained for risks. Accordingly, we reject FSLIC's argument that the “discovery” period should be equitably tolled to extend the period for discovery of losses under National Union's and Lloyd's fidelity bonds.




Facts: Company failed and was taken over by the federal government. The government brought a claim on an insurance policy taken out by the old company that had terminated upon the takeover. The district court held that no claim could be made because the policy terminated upon takeover. The government appealed arguing, among other things, that the termination should be equitably tolled.

Issue: Did the district court err when it determined that equitable tolling did not properly apply to extend the period for discovery of losses under the bond?

Rule: The termination of an insurance policy can be equitably tolled “due to the adverse domination and control [of the insured] by the very defalcating ‘employees' who caused the losses.”

Holding: The district court property held that the principal of equitable tolling is not warranted under the facts of this case.

Reasoning: Generally, where an insurance policy requires "discovery" of wrongdoing before bringing a claim, the termination of that policy will be strictly enforced even if it precludes coverage by the insured. Only under certain circumstances may this general rule may be set aside and the tolling of the discovery of loss provision considered. In Admirality Fund, the court found it equitable to toll the termination of the policy because the wrongdoing was done by those who completely controlled the insured. It would be inequitable to prevent the entity from recovering in a situation where there was no possibility that the entity, because of the control by the wrongdoer, could have discovered the alleged wrongdoing. Here, the facts do not present such a case. In this situation, any wrongdoing was not done by those in control of the entity. Furthermore, before FSLIC takeover, regulators were independently investigating the bank and could have discovered the employee's wrongdoing and filed claim before the termination of the policy.


If anyone has questions relating to this topic, feel free to post them and I, or someone else, will be sure to answer them.
Last edited by orangeswarm on Fri May 29, 2009 12:35 pm, edited 4 times in total.

User avatar
Cleareyes
Posts: 408
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2009 5:59 pm

Re: How to Brief a Case 101 - Don't waste money on Law Preview

Postby Cleareyes » Fri May 29, 2009 11:45 am

Great! Thanks. You're a mensch!

User avatar
Unemployed
Posts: 699
Joined: Mon Feb 02, 2009 12:35 am

Re: How to Brief a Case 101 - Don't waste money on Law Preview

Postby Unemployed » Fri May 29, 2009 11:46 am

This is great stuff. Thank you!

User avatar
zettsscores40
Posts: 2118
Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2008 5:49 pm

Re: How to Brief a Case 101 - Don't waste money on Law Preview

Postby zettsscores40 » Fri May 29, 2009 11:48 am

Book- to-the-motherfucking-mark.

Masternater9
Posts: 24
Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2008 12:16 pm

Re: How to Brief a Case 101 - Don't waste money on Law Preview

Postby Masternater9 » Fri May 29, 2009 11:51 am

Thanks man. You have helped remove a great weight from my troubled 0L mind. You rock.

User avatar
badlydrawn
Posts: 145
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2008 12:11 am

Re: How to Brief a Case 101 - Don't waste money on Law Preview

Postby badlydrawn » Fri May 29, 2009 12:02 pm

thanks for this.

User avatar
BBoy_TigerStyle
Posts: 7
Joined: Thu Mar 12, 2009 3:23 pm

Re: How to Brief a Case 101 - Don't waste money on Law Preview

Postby BBoy_TigerStyle » Fri May 29, 2009 12:07 pm

This is great! Thanks.

User avatar
orangeswarm
Posts: 198
Joined: Tue Dec 12, 2006 8:38 pm

Re: How to Brief a Case 101 - Don't waste money on Law Preview

Postby orangeswarm » Fri May 29, 2009 12:34 pm

Cleareyes wrote:Great! Thanks. You're a mensch!


Thanks (I had to google that). :mrgreen:

User avatar
TTT-LS
Posts: 764
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 5:36 pm

Re: How to Brief a Case 101 - Don't waste money on Law Preview

Postby TTT-LS » Fri May 29, 2009 4:27 pm

.
Last edited by TTT-LS on Mon Jun 21, 2010 3:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.

dan123456
Posts: 11
Joined: Fri Nov 21, 2008 3:52 pm

Re: How to Brief a Case 101 - Don't waste money on Law Preview

Postby dan123456 » Fri May 29, 2009 4:31 pm

Thanks. +1

User avatar
macattaq
Posts: 441
Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2009 1:46 pm

Re: How to Brief a Case 101 - Don't waste money on Law Preview

Postby macattaq » Sat Jun 06, 2009 2:43 pm

When you are doing the issue section of the brief, is it possible for more than one issue to come into play?

For example, I am briefing Regina v. Dudley And Stephens. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R_v_Dudley_and_Stephens

I have identified 3 issues:
-Explicit to the case: At what point does a killing become murder, and are the facts sufficient to support this?
-Generally: At what point does a mere act become a crime?
-More interestingly: Is it acceptable to injure or kill one in order to benefit the many, and if so, under what circumstances (an application of classical utilitarianism)?

Is the case explicit issue the only pertinent one, or does identifying multiple issues within the case provide more benefit when it comes to in-class discussion? I know that the issue is stated within the court's analysis, but I picked up on the other issues through reading the court's reasoning.

JaHerer22
Posts: 8
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 10:57 am

Re: How to Brief a Case 101 - Don't waste money on Law Preview

Postby JaHerer22 » Sun Jun 07, 2009 9:16 pm

@ MacAttack

The issue is as specific is possible--don't try to make it broad. In Regina the issue would be "Can necessity be a defense to murder?"

But why are you briefing cases now? Briefing is worthless when you actually know what cases you are assigned, I can't even imagine how worthless it is to brief random cases.

User avatar
Chuch
Posts: 63
Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2008 1:53 pm

Re: How to Brief a Case 101 - Don't waste money on Law Preview

Postby Chuch » Sun Jun 07, 2009 9:23 pm

.

professorplum
Posts: 1
Joined: Sat May 30, 2009 12:01 am

Re: How to Brief a Case 101 - Don't waste money on Law Preview

Postby professorplum » Sun Jun 07, 2009 9:32 pm

And then, after a year, you realize you don't need to brief. . . It is good for not sounding stupid when you are cold called though. That's pretty much it. Since you are going to brief your first term, if not year, if there is an important dissent or concurrence, it is worth writing that down too (especially if it forms basis for new judicial reasoning in future).

User avatar
macattaq
Posts: 441
Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2009 1:46 pm

Re: How to Brief a Case 101 - Don't waste money on Law Preview

Postby macattaq » Mon Jun 08, 2009 1:01 am

JaHerer22 wrote:@ MacAttack

The issue is as specific is possible--don't try to make it broad. In Regina the issue would be "Can necessity be a defense to murder?"

But why are you briefing cases now? Briefing is worthless when you actually know what cases you are assigned, I can't even imagine how worthless it is to brief random cases.


I have a summer Crim Law class that starts on the 22nd, and I got the assignment in my email on Thursday. My summer is over. LOL.

So, I really just want to restate the issue as precisely and as succinctly as possible? The other issues I noted though, would more likely fit under policy, I think. Is it even worthwhile to note other issues?

canadaar
Posts: 12
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2008 2:08 pm

Re: How to Brief a Case 101 - Don't waste money on Law Preview

Postby canadaar » Mon Jun 08, 2009 1:34 am

Thanks orangeswarm.

booker09
Posts: 94
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 1:52 pm

Re: How to Brief a Case 101 - Don't waste money on Law Preview

Postby booker09 » Tue Jun 09, 2009 2:20 am

AWESOME, op!

HalfManHalfAmazing
Posts: 19
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2007 11:10 pm

Re: How to Brief a Case 101 - Don't waste money on Law Preview

Postby HalfManHalfAmazing » Tue Jun 09, 2009 2:25 am

In an exam fact pattern there will be multiple issues, in an assigned brief, there will only be one issue.

User avatar
Zeph
Posts: 187
Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2009 12:22 pm

Re: How to Brief a Case 101 - Don't waste money on Law Preview

Postby Zeph » Tue Jun 09, 2009 2:39 am

Good stuff thanks

User avatar
macattaq
Posts: 441
Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2009 1:46 pm

Re: How to Brief a Case 101 - Don't waste money on Law Preview

Postby macattaq » Tue Jun 09, 2009 9:30 am

HalfManHalfAmazing wrote:In an exam fact pattern there will be multiple issues, in an assigned brief, there will only be one issue.


So, I should only go with the issue that is explicitly worked through in the case? That would be something like, "Is homicide justifiable if it preserves one's life?"

User avatar
98234872348
Posts: 1547
Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2008 3:25 pm

Re: How to Brief a Case 101 - Don't waste money on Law Preview

Postby 98234872348 » Tue Jun 09, 2009 9:48 am

Thanks to the OP, this is gold.

I took a Con Law Poly Sci class in Undergrad that taught us how to brief cases quite well; I would suggest any aspiring law students still in undergrad to consider taking a similar course rather than paying extra money for a prep course and limiting your ability to enjoy your summer before 1L begins...

User avatar
badlydrawn
Posts: 145
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2008 12:11 am

Re: How to Brief a Case 101 - Don't waste money on Law Preview

Postby badlydrawn » Sun Aug 02, 2009 6:53 pm

Other sources suggest including a procedural history, reasoning of lower courts, as well as dissenting and concurring opinions. I was curious to know whether TLS 2Ls and 3Ls find it useful for exam-writing to include these articles in briefs or general study.

User avatar
underdawg
Posts: 1131
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2007 1:15 am

Re: How to Brief a Case 101 - Don't waste money on Law Preview

Postby underdawg » Sun Aug 02, 2009 7:05 pm

how to brief 101:

1. wait til the prof talks about the case
2. write down what seems important or emphasized
3. profit

there is no "???"!

legends159
Posts: 1090
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2007 4:12 pm

Re: How to Brief a Case 101 - Don't waste money on Law Preview

Postby legends159 » Sun Aug 02, 2009 8:51 pm

almost every "how to do well on law exams" recommends not briefing and it makes sense b/c you're not going to have to know any of that info besides the BLL for an exam.

User avatar
underdawg
Posts: 1131
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2007 1:15 am

Re: How to Brief a Case 101 - Don't waste money on Law Preview

Postby underdawg » Sun Aug 02, 2009 9:08 pm

that's not true either




Return to “Forum for Law School Students”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: grades??, gwcolonial24, lawlaura3494 and 16 guests