Acing Contracts vs. Chirelstein

(Study Tips, Dealing With Stress, Maintaining a Social Life, Financial Aid, Internships, Bar Exam, Careers in Law . . . )

Posts: 53
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2016 10:44 pm

Acing Contracts vs. Chirelstein

Postby UghNonAmus » Tue Nov 21, 2017 5:13 pm

So, I know basically nothing about contracts. Laptops allowed, boring lectures, early in the morning, general laziness. It seems that I am not the only one who has to self-teach contracts, and these seem to be the top two recommended supplements for doing so.

Which one should I read first? I'm leaning towards Acing, but open to suggestions as to efficacy or redundancy.

User avatar
Wild Card

Posts: 449
Joined: Fri Jan 17, 2014 6:48 pm

Re: Acing Contracts vs. Chirelstein

Postby Wild Card » Tue Nov 21, 2017 5:18 pm

Chirelstein is worth one close read for a general overview of the course, but it won't provide you with the analytical framework that you need to attack your exam.


Posts: 196
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2017 3:44 pm

Re: Acing Contracts vs. Chirelstein

Postby SomewhatLearnedHand » Tue Nov 21, 2017 5:40 pm

I thought the E&E was pretty good. It was missing a few areas we covered in my course it touched on about 85% of it.


Posts: 686
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 11:23 am

Re: Acing Contracts vs. Chirelstein

Postby StopLawying » Fri Nov 24, 2017 12:06 am

I have the same problem, looking for some suggestions. Maybe we're in the same class lol.
I think I'm gonna go with Acing since it's better for exams with the checklists and the rest of the stuff.
Open to hearing if there's a better supplement though.

Return to “Forum for Law School Students�

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: bpfishers90 and 19 guests